Connect with us


BIG STORY

Court Orders Lagos To Probe Killing Of 20-Yr-Old Journalist Pelumi During #EndSars Protest

Published

on

A Federal High Court in Lagos has issued a ruling ordering the Lagos State Government to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of Pelumi Onifade, a 20-year-old journalist who was arrested by police during the 2020 #EndSARS protests and subsequently found deceased in a mortuary.

The court, presided over by Justice Ayokunle Olayinka Faji, also directed the government to convene a coroner’s inquest to ascertain the cause of death and identify those responsible for the young journalist’s tragic demise.

This ruling was made in response to a lawsuit filed by Media Rights Agenda (MRA) against the police and the state government.

According to a statement released by Idowu Adewale, Communications Officer for MRA, the court’s judgment marks a significant step towards accountability and justice for Pelumi Onifade’s untimely death.

Justice Faji, the statement said, agreed that the government’s Chief Law Officer “cannot just conduct an inquest without a duplicate of the case-file” but he ruled that Section 74 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law of Lagos State gives the Attorney-General the power to request a case file from the Commissioner of Police.”

Although the court dismissed five of the claims made by the MRA against the police on the grounds that there was no evidence before the court to support them, Justice Faji noted that none of the facts in the MRA’s affidavit was denied by the Attorney-General who only raised an issue of law, adding that in the course of oral arguments, the latter’s counsel also undertook to conduct an inquest.

A Lagos-based lawyer, Mr. Charles Musa, filed an originating summons on August 4, 2021, on behalf of the MRA, against the Lagos State Commissioner of Police, the Inspector-General of Police and the Attorney-General of Lagos State.

In the suit, the MRA asked the court to declare that Onifade’s shooting in Oko Oba in the Agege Local Government Area of Lagos State, by agents of the COP and the IGP on October 24, 2020, in the course of his journalistic work, is unconstitutional and a gross violation of his fundamental rights as guaranteed by Section 33 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and Article 4 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act (Cap A9) Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004;

“Mr. Onifade’s arrest and unlawful or restriction of his liberty by agents of the COP and the IGP on October 24, 2020, in the course of his journalistic work is unconstitutional and a gross violation of his fundamental rights as guaranteed by Sections 35, 39 and 46(1) of the 1999 Constitution and Articles 5 and9 of the African Charter;

“The constitutional and statutory duties of the respondents do not extend to unlawful detention of innocent individuals who have not been charged to Court or found guilty of any offence by a competent court of law in Nigeria; and the COP and the IGP have an obligation to investigate crimes committed against Mr. Onifade, a journalist exercising his right to freedom of expression as guaranteed under Sections 33 and 39 of the Constitution and Articles 4 and 9 of the African Charter.

“The MRA also asked the court to issue three orders, directing the respondents to launch a transparent, impartial and independent investigation into the circumstances of the death of Onifade whose body was found in a morgue in Lagos; directing them to conduct a coroner’s inquest to ascertain the cause of his death; and directing them to identify and prosecute those responsible for his death,” the statement added.

In his judgment, Justice Faji pointed out that although the Commissioner of Police and the Inspector General of Police were served with the originating summons and other processes in the suit, they did not file any response.

He noted that the MRA’s Programme Officer, Mr. John Gbadamosi, who deposed to the affidavit in support of the suit, did not witness any of the facts relevant to the matter, adding that there was also no documentation in support of the claim that Onifade’s corpse was deposited in a mortuary.

Justice Faji also observed that although there was a constant reference in the affidavit to the family of the deceased who, he said, would have the necessary information regarding their various interactions with the police, none of them filed any evidence in support of the incident.  He therefore dismissed the claims against the police for lack of evidence.

Although the judge commended the Office of the Attorney-General of Lagos State for upholding the duties of the office by attending court and assisting the court in the matter, he noted that the explanation by the Attorney-General’s lawyer that the reason a coroner’s inquest was not conducted was because the duplicate of the case file was not forwarded to his office.

According to him, in response to the court’s question on what the Attorney-General did about the matter since being served with the court processes, the lawyer submitted that the Attorney-General is ready to conduct an inquest.

“Justice Faji stressed that the Attorney-General is not alleged to have known about the alleged unlawful killing of Mr. Onifade and is also not accused of being involved in the killing but that as stated by MRA, he has a duty to conduct an inquest into the circumstances of the death.

“He said indeed, in paragraph 15 of the counter­ affidavit, the 3rd respondent (the Attorney-General) has stated that he would prosecute anyone found to have a prima facie case established against him”.

“Justice Faji therefore directed the Attorney-General to take all necessary steps to see to the investigation of the circumstances of the death of Mr.  Onifade and to conduct a coroner’s inquest to ascertain the cause of the death as well as identify and prosecute those responsible for his death,” the statement concluded.

BIG STORY

Police Arrest Six For ‘Hacking Telecoms Firm To Divert N7.7bn Airtime’, Recover 400 Laptops, 1000 Mobile Phones

Published

on

Operatives of the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) have arrested six suspects for allegedly hacking into a telecommunication company in Nigeria to divert airtime and mobile data worth N7.7 billion.

A statement on Wednesday by Benjamin Hundeyin, the force spokesperson, said the suspects allegedly gained unlawful access to the telecommunications company’s core systems.

The suspects are Ahmad Bala, Karibu Mohammed Shehu, Umar Habib, Obinna Ananaba, Ibrahim Shehu, and Masa’ud Sa’ad.

Hundeyin said operatives recovered two mini plazas, retail outlets containing over 400 laptops, 1,000 mobile phones, and a Toyota vehicle.

The force spokesperson said a “substantial” amount of money was traced to the suspects’ bank accounts.

“The syndicate was responsible for the illegal diversion of a telecommunications company’s airtime and data resources, resulting in an estimated financial loss of over ₦7.7 billion,” the statement reads.

“The breakthrough followed a petition by a Nigerian telecommunications company, which reported suspicious and unauthorized activities within its billing and payments infrastructure.

“Investigations revealed that internal staff login credentials had been compromised, granting threat actors unlawful access to core systems.

“Following weeks of planning, coordinated enforcement operations were executed in October 2025 in Kano and Katsina States, with a follow-up arrest in the Federal Capital Territory.

“The suspects would be charged to court on the completion of the investigation.

“Meanwhile, the Inspector-General of Police, IGP Kayode Adeolu Egbetokun, Ph.D., NPM, has commended the officers involved in the investigation for their professionalism.”

 

 

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

NLC Directs Unions To Continue FCTA Strike Despite Court Order

Published

on

The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has directed its affiliate unions in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) to continue the ongoing strike by workers of the FCT Administration, despite a court order directing that the industrial action be suspended.

The directive was contained in a circular dated January 27, 2026, and signed by Benson Upah, the acting general secretary of the NLC.

In the circular addressed to presidents and general secretaries of all Abuja-based unions, the NLC said it was “reaffirming and reinforcing” its earlier instructions for workers to sustain the strike action until their demands are fully met.

“We hereby reaffirm and reinforce the directive to all affiliate unions in the FCT to not only proceed with the ongoing action but to intensify and sustain it until all workers’ demands are fully addressed,” the circular reads.

The NLC noted that issues such as unpaid wage awards and promotion arrears, non-remittance of pension and National Housing Fund deductions, as well as alleged intimidation of workers, are yet to be resolved.

“These violations are grave, unacceptable, and incompatible with the principles of fairness, justice, and decent work,” the NLC said.

“Affiliate unions are therefore directed to fully maintain participation in the industrial action; reinforce mobilisation of members for all congress-approved activities; and mobilise members to continuously participate in daily prayer and solidarity sessions from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm at designated venues across the FCT.”

The NLC warned against any withdrawal from the strike at this stage, saying such action would embolden further violations against workers.

“This struggle demands unity, discipline, and unwavering commitment. All affiliates are expected to comply strictly with this directive in the collective interest of the Nigerian working class. An injury to one is an injury to all,” the circular reads.

On Tuesday, a national industrial court in Abuja ordered workers on the payroll of the FCTA to suspend the strike.

Delivering a ruling, Emmanuel Subilim, presiding judge, held that although the matter before the court amounted to a trade dispute, the defendants’ right to embark on industrial action was not absolute.

He held that once a dispute has been referred to the national industrial court, any ongoing strike must cease pending the determination of the case.

 

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Return To Work Immediately Or Face Legal Action, Wike Tells FCTA Workers As Court Orders Strike Suspension

Published

on

The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, on Tuesday warned striking staff of the Federal Capital Territory Administration to return to work immediately or face legal action, following a National Industrial Court ruling ordering an end to the strike that has disrupted public services in Abuja for over a week.

Briefing journalists shortly after the court’s decision, Wike insisted that the rule of law must prevail and accused political actors of exploiting the industrial action for motives unrelated to workers’ welfare.

“The administration was already in the process of mediation when some politicians hijacked the strike,” he said, adding that several of the workers’ demands were “frivolous” and either unreasonable or already addressed.

Wike said the FCTA approached the court after determining that the strike had been “hijacked by politicians,” despite ongoing dialogue and attention to a substantial number of workers’ concerns.

He highlighted the administration’s efforts to support staff welfare, including salary payments and reforms within the civil service.

The minister disclosed that more than N12bn had just been approved for the payment of January salaries to FCTA workers, describing the move as evidence of the government’s commitment to its workforce.

Pointing to improved revenue performance under his leadership, Wike noted that the FCT had generated over N30bn in internally generated revenue, a significant increase compared with previous years.

He urged workers to recognise reforms implemented by the administration, including the establishment of the Civil Service Commission and infrastructure investments across the territory.

“Workers are largely responsible for the lack of development in states, including the FCT,” he said.

Wike dismissed circulating reports suggesting he had been forced out of his office during protests linked to the strike.

“I was never chased out of the office,” he said, explaining that he had merely stepped out to see President Bola Tinubu off at the airport.

Adopting a firm stance, the minister warned against further disruptions of government operations.

“Anyone who dares to lock the gates again will be made a scapegoat, because the law must be obeyed.”

He alleged that some senior civil service officials had played a role in sustaining the strike, claiming that certain directors were instigating the action, but said this would not prevent the administration from pursuing the right course.

Wike emphasised that engagement between workers and the government did not require direct access to him personally.

“Seeing me in person is not a right,” he said, noting that workers’ representatives had been in discussions with management throughout the dispute.

He concluded by warning that staff who failed to comply with the court order and resume duties immediately would face legal action, signalling a tougher enforcement phase as the FCTA seeks to restore full public services.

Workers of the FCTA, operating under the Joint Union Action Committee, had embarked on an indefinite strike on January 19 over unresolved welfare concerns.

The National Industrial Court issued an interlocutory injunction stopping the strike after an application by Wike.

Justice E.D. Subilim granted the order on January 21 and adjourned the suit to March 23, 2026, for hearing of the substantive case.

Delivering his ruling on Tuesday, Justice Subilim said the defendants’ right to strike was not absolute.

“The defendant’s right to an industrial action is not absolute, but as circumscribed by law,” he said. He prohibited workers from participating in the strike once a dispute had been referred to the court and ordered that any ongoing strike must cease pending determination.

“An order of interlocutory injunction is hereby granted, restraining the defendants and respondents, their agents, representatives… together with all other members of the Joint Unions Action Committee … from further embarking on any industrial action, strike, picketing, lockout, or any other form of obstruction against the claimant, parastatals, and political appointees,” the judge added.

Counsel for the claimants, James Onoja (SAN), hailed the court’s decision, urging the unions to obey the order and return to work while allowing room for mediation.

“We commend the court for making an order for the stopping of the strike… I think this is commendable because it will allow the parties to discuss. Our plea to the Union is to allow industrial harmony. They should go back to work and allow for mediation,” Onoja said.

Counsel for the respondents, Maxwell Opara, described the workers as law-abiding citizens and said he would advise the unions to respect the court order.

“The workers are law-abiding citizens. We are going to advise them to respect the court. The one good thing is that the court has also mandated that we commence mediation, not as a matter of advice, in line with the law… we must comply with it,” Opara said.

JUAC President, Rifkatu Iortyer, confirmed that workers would comply, call off the strike and immediately return to work while continuing to “push for other things.”

“We are law-abiding citizens, and because they have said we should return to work, we are returning to work, pending our next appearance,” she said.

Continue Reading


 

 


 

 

 

 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular


Warning: Undefined array key "slug" in /home/porsch10/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php on line 2117

Warning: Undefined array key "slug" in /home/porsch10/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php on line 2117

Warning: Undefined array key "slug" in /home/porsch10/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php on line 2117