Connect with us


BIG STORY

Tesla To Lay Off 10% Of Global Workforce, Cites Role Duplication, Cost Reduction

Published

on

Tesla plans to lay off 10% of its global workforce as demand for electric vehicles (EV) declines.

According to a Bloomberg article published on Monday, Elon Musk conveyed the downsizing to employees at the automobile company via a memo.

Musk cited duplication of duties and the necessity to save expenses as reasons for the reduction.

“As we prepare the company for our next phase of growth, it is extremely important to look at every aspect of the company for cost reductions and increasing productivity,” Musk wrote.

“As part of this effort, we have done a thorough review of the organization and made the difficult decision to reduce our headcount by more than 10 per cent globally. There is nothing I hate more, but it must be done.”

Responding to a comment on the planned layoff on X, Musk said “about every five years, we need to reorganize and streamline the company for the next phase of growth”.

If the cuts apply companywide, the dismissal would amount to more than 14,000 employees, the publication noted.

Tesla ended 2023 with 140,473 employees, nearly double its workforce three years ago.

The decision to lay off workers comes as Tesla faces declining sales and an intensifying price war for EVs.

According to the publication, Tesla announced that vehicle deliveries early this month missed expectations by a wide margin, posting its first quarterly decline in four years.

“Several analysts are bracing for the EV maker’s sales to potentially shrink for the year, citing slow output of its newest model, the Cybertruck, and a lull in new products until the company starts producing a next-generation vehicle late next year,” the publication said.

“The EV slowdown Tesla has felt of late has been widespread. China’s BYD Co. delivered just 300,114 battery-electric vehicles in the first quarter, down 43 per cent from the final three months of last year, when it briefly pulled ahead as the world’s top EV seller.”

Manufacturers including Volkswagen AG, General Motors Co., and Ford Motor Co. have delayed, dialled back or altogether scrapped EV projects as customers protest high prices and a scarcity of charging points.

BIG STORY

Bill To Make Appeal Court Final Arbiter For Governorship Election Petitions Passes Second Reading

Published

on

A bill proposing that the Court of Appeal serve as the final authority for governorship election petitions has passed second reading in the House of Representatives.

The bill, sponsored by Nnamdi Ezechi, who represents Ndokwa East/Ndokwa West/Ukwuani federal constituency of Delta State, seeks to amend Section 246 of the 1999 Constitution.

Currently, Section 246 stipulates that the Court of Appeal’s rulings on National Assembly and State Houses of Assembly election petitions are final.

The proposed amendment aims to extend this finality to governorship election disputes, preventing such cases from reaching the Supreme Court.

Objective of the Bill

When the bill passed first reading in 2024, Ezechi explained that the legislation aims to reduce delays and cut costs in post-election litigations.

If enacted, the law will eliminate the Supreme Court’s role in resolving governorship election petitions—a significant departure from the current judicial process.

Recent Supreme Court Reversals

There have been instances where the Court of Appeal nullified governorship elections, only for the Supreme Court to overturn those rulings.

Plateau State (2023): The tribunal and Court of Appeal nullified the election of Caleb Mutfwang of the PDP. However, in January 2024, the Supreme Court overturned this decision and affirmed his election.

Kano State (2023): The tribunal and Court of Appeal removed Abba Yusuf as Governor. The Supreme Court later reinstated him.

The proposed amendment would prevent such reversals by making the Court of Appeal’s decision final in governorship election disputes.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Samsung Electronics Co-CEO Han Jong-Hee Dies From ‘Cardiac Arrest’

Published

on

Han Jong-Hee, co-chief executive officer (CEO) of Samsung Electronics, has died at the age of 63 due to cardiac arrest.

According to CNN, the company confirmed his passing on Tuesday.

The report states that “Jong-Hee” had been leading Samsung’s consumer electronics and mobile devices businesses since 2022 and was appointed as vice chairman and CEO that same year.

A company spokesperson stated that “Jun Young-Hyun”, his co-CEO, who was appointed last week, will now assume the role of Samsung’s sole CEO.

Samsung Pays Tribute

In an internal message obtained by CNN, Samsung honored “Jong-Hee”, recognizing his 37 years of service and his leadership in establishing Samsung’s TV business as a global leader.

The company also credited him with contributing to growth in its electronics and appliances businesses despite a challenging business landscape.

“Our deepest condolences are with his family and loved ones during this difficult time,” the message stated.

A Career in Innovation

“Jong-Hee” joined Samsung in 1988 after earning a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Inha University.

Before leading Samsung’s electronics and devices division, he was responsible for its display operations.

A company biography published last week described him as a key figure in the development of Samsung’s LED TVs, emphasizing his role in maintaining the company’s technology leadership.

Challenges for Samsung

The report highlighted that Samsung has faced significant challenges in recent years, particularly in its logic semiconductor business, which has struggled to compete with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) in advanced chip production and client acquisition.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Judge Recuses Self From “Natasha Akpoti’s” Case Over Bias Allegation

Published

on

Obiora Egwuatu, a judge at the Federal High Court in Abuja, has withdrawn from the case filed by “Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan”, senator representing Kogi Central

Egwuatu, on Tuesday, stated that his decision was based on an allegation of bias against him by “Senate President Godswill Akpabio”.

The suit was initiated by “Akpoti-Uduaghan” to prevent the Senate Committee on Ethics and Public Petitions from carrying out disciplinary proceedings against her.

On March 4, the judge had issued an order restraining the Senate from initiating disciplinary actions against “Akpoti-Uduaghan”, following an ex parte application submitted by her legal representatives.

Case to Be Reassigned

After hearing from the legal teams of the involved parties, “Egwuatu” announced his withdrawal from the case.

He directed that the case file be forwarded to “John Tsoho, the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court”, for reassignment.

The defendants in the case include:

  • The Clerk of the National Assembly
  • The Senate
  • The Senate President
  • The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Ethics

Previously, the judge ruled that the defendants had 72 hours to show cause why an interlocutory injunction should not be granted against them.

However, 48 hours later, the Senate suspended “Akpoti-Uduaghan” for six months after adopting the committee’s report.

Additionally, the Senate ordered that:

  • Her office be locked
  • She must return all Senate properties in her possession to “The Clerk of the National Assembly” for the duration of her suspension.

On March 19, “Egwuatu” overturned his March 4 order, which had earlier prevented the Senate from suspending “Akpoti-Uduaghan”.

Continue Reading



 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular