Connect with us


BIG STORY

Plan To Send Migrants To Rwanda Unlawful, UK Supreme Court Rules

Published

on

The UK Supreme Court, on Wednesday, rejected a contentious government plan to transfer migrants to Rwanda, upholding a lower court judgement that it was illegal, in a major blow for Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.

A five-judge bench of the UK’s highest court agreed with Court of Appeal justices that the strategy was incompatible with Britain’s international treaty responsibilities.

“We conclude that the Court of Appeal… was entitled to find that there are substantial grounds for believing that the removal of the claimants to Rwanda would expose them to a real risk of ill-treatment,” they concluded.

The judges agreed with the lower court’s June verdict that Rwanda risked forcibly returning asylum seekers and refugees to a country where they could face persecution, in a move known as refoulement.

“Having been taken through the evidence, we agree with their conclusion,” they added in their 56-page ruling.

Sunak’s ruling Conservatives have insisted the Rwanda scheme is crucial to reduce “illegal” immigration across the Channel on small boats, an issue set to feature prominently in the next general election.

But the ruling scuppers a saga that began in April last year when Britain signed a deal with Rwanda to send undocumented migrants to interim centres there, and leaves the UK leader’s immigration agenda in tatters.

It is also set to widen rifts in the ruling Tory party between right-wing lawmakers and moderates.

Sunak said the ruling was “not the outcome we wanted” and the government “will now consider next steps” while ministers in Kigali “take issue” with the ruling that Rwanda was not a safe third country.

‘Stop The Boats’

Hardliner Suella Braverman launched a scathing attack on Sunak Tuesday, the day after she was fired as interior minister, accusing him of “betrayal” and “magical thinking” over the policy.

She wants Britain to leave or disregard the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and “any other obligations which inhibit our ability to remove those with no right to be in the UK”.

The Migration and Economic Development Partnership envisages sending to Rwanda anyone who has made what the government calls “dangerous or illegal journeys, such as by small boat or hidden lorries” to the UK.

The government insists it is essential to deter migrants trying to cross the Channel from northern France in rudimentary small vessels.

More than 27,000 have made the journey this year.

The government passed legislation in July barring any “illegal” arrivals from claiming asylum.

Sunak’s pledge to “stop the boats” is one of his five key priorities for this year, after succeeding Liz Truss in October 2022.

His administration says regular and irregular immigration must be slashed to ease pressure on housing and other social services, such as health.

Opponents decry the Rwanda policy as cruel, expensive and difficult to implement. They also argue it is in breach of international law on asylum and refugees.

The first deportees were on a plane and ready to fly to Rwanda in June 2022 when a last-minute ECHR injunction prevented any deportations.

The High Court had ruled the plan broadly lawful, but the senior courts have now quashed that.

‘Disgraceful’

The Supreme Court ruling forces the government back to the drawing board to try to drive down asylum seeker numbers, with speculation it may try to strike deals with other countries.

It is also expected to renew demands from right-wingers that Britain withdraw from the ECHR — a drastic idea that Sunak has so far refused to back.

In her excoriating letter Braverman, who has called sending asylum seekers to Rwanda her “dream” and “obsession”, accused the prime minister of having “no appetite for doing what is necessary” on immigration.

She is widely believed to covet the Tory leadership and her hardline stance on the issue is seen as red meat to the party’s grassroots.

But Sunak’s surprise appointment of ex-prime minister David Cameron as foreign secretary and the switch of James Cleverly to the interior ministry suggests he is halting his party’s post-Brexit lurch to the right.

Migrant advocates welcomed Wednesday’s court ruling.

The Refugee Council said it was a “victory for the rights of men, women and children who simply want to be safe”.

Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty International’s UK arm, urged ministers to “now draw a line under a disgraceful chapter in the UK’s political history”.

 

Credit: ChannelsTV

BIG STORY

FX Inflows, Reserves Boost Naira To N1,497/$

Published

on

The Nigerian naira on Monday gained ground against the United States dollar, breaking below the ₦1,500/$ barrier for the first time in over six months. Figures from the Central Bank of Nigeria showed the currency closed at ₦1,497.46/$, an improvement on the previous rate of ₦1,501.49/$, representing a 0.27 per cent appreciation.

The last time the naira traded under ₦1,500/$ at the official market was between February 24 and March 4, 2025. The recent rebound follows a week where the local currency hovered around that mark, with intra-day trades mostly above ₦1,500/$.

The positive movement was also seen in the parallel market, where the naira rose by 0.33 per cent to close at ₦1,535/$, according to data from CardinalStone Research.

Market trackers noted that the naira advanced by 0.98 per cent week-on-week to end at ₦1,501.50/$ at the official window, while the parallel market posted a 0.33 per cent gain at ₦1,535/$.

A report by Coronation Weekly Update highlighted that the official exchange rate closed the week at a ₦35.50 or 2.23 per cent premium compared to the parallel market rate, showing the gap between both markets has continued to narrow.

The report also indicated that total foreign exchange inflows into Nigeria reached $550.90 million last week, slightly lower than the $567.20 million recorded in the preceding week.

Foreign portfolio investors accounted for the bulk of the inflows with $303.8 million, or 55.15 per cent. Exporters contributed 17.61 per cent, non-bank corporates 17.57 per cent, other corporates 4.32 per cent, foreign direct investments 3.39 per cent, the CBN 2.36 per cent, and individuals 0.60 per cent.

Analysts attributed the naira’s appreciation to strong foreign portfolio inflows, robust external reserves, and sustained interventions from the central bank.

AIICO Capital observed that abundant dollar liquidity from portfolio investors, oil exporters, and offshore flows created a stable market tone throughout the week.

“The FX market is expected to retain its stability, buoyed by CBN policy measures and government fiscal actions to maintain sufficient liquidity,” analysts at the firm stated.

Cowry Asset Management also noted that the naira’s rebound was driven by steady inflows, CBN interventions, and growing reserves, but cautioned that speculative activities could still spark volatility.

“We expect the naira to maintain its upward trend in the near term, anchored on dollar inflows, central bank interventions, and stronger reserves. Nonetheless, speculative trades may reintroduce pressure,” the company said.

Experts forecast that the naira is likely to trade within a narrow range in the short term. Coronation analysts suggested that stability could persist if inflows remain steady and reserves stay healthy but warned that pressure may return should portfolio inflows slow or FX demand rise ahead of the festive season.

Meanwhile, Nigeria’s gross external reserves climbed to $41.69 billion as of Friday, reflecting consistent daily accretions. Analysts believe this trend will enhance investor confidence and reinforce the central bank’s stabilisation efforts.

Despite recent gains, experts cautioned that the naira’s resilience depends on deeper structural reforms, diversified foreign exchange sources, and policies aimed at attracting long-term direct investment rather than relying heavily on portfolio flows.

For now, the naira’s recovery below ₦1,500/$ signals renewed market confidence, though its durability will be tested in the coming weeks against external shocks and speculative pressure.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Food Price Crash: Farmers Fault FG’s Order As Agro-Imports Hit N2.2tn

Published

on

Nigeria’s agricultural import bill climbed to N2.22 trillion in the first half of 2025, prompting sharp criticism from farmers, millers and other stakeholders who say presidential directives to “crash” food prices ignore market realities and are worsening the country’s food insecurity.

The concerns follow a directive reportedly issued by President Bola Tinubu asking a Federal Executive Council committee to take steps to lower food prices nationwide. At a capacity-building workshop for journalists in Abuja, the Minister of State for Agriculture and Food Security, Sabi Abdullahi, told participants the presidency had mandated action to ensure the safe passage of agricultural commodities along the country’s transport routes.

“I can say it on good authority to you that the President has given a matching order to a Federal Executive Council committee already handling it,” Abdullahi said, adding that government efforts would focus on reducing the logistics costs that push up prices at the point of delivery.

But farmers and rice millers said a presidential order alone will not fix structural problems in the sector. Kabir Ibrahim, national president of the All Farmers Association of Nigeria (AFAN), said transport cost reductions would help but are insufficient by themselves. “The cost of food will go down if transport costs go down, but that alone is not enough,” he said, adding that many farmers are now selling at prices that prevent them from buying fertiliser.

Peter Dama, chairman of the Competitive African Rice Forum, criticised the top-down approach. “You don’t just come out and give an order to crash prices. It doesn’t work that way,” he told The PUNCH, urging the government to engage private operators and provide targeted subsidies rather than issue unilateral price directives. “At best, the government should have called stakeholders in the transport and agric sectors, discussed with them, and provided subsidies. Pronouncements without engagement will not work.”

Stakeholders also pointed to stalled mechanisation plans. The government announced the launch of 2,000 tractors in July 2024 to support farmers, but more than a year later the machines have not been distributed. An anonymous official in the agriculture ministry told The Punch that distribution modalities are still awaiting presidential approval and described the rollout as a process involving several ministries and technical committees.

Weak consumer purchasing power was flagged as an equally urgent problem. Even where prices have fallen, many Nigerians lack the income to buy food, a point AFAN’s Ibrahim stressed: “What we are telling the government is that it is the purchasing power of the Naira that is causing problems. Even if food prices fall, people don’t have the money to buy.”

Data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) shows agricultural imports rose from N1.04tn in Q1 2025 to N1.18tn in Q2 — a 14.35 per cent increase quarter-on-quarter — and representing a 32.6 per cent year-on-year rise from N893.25bn in Q2 2024. The first half of 2024 posted N1.81tn, meaning imports rose 22.65 per cent year-on-year.

Much of the surge followed a 180-day duty-free window introduced in July 2024 that allowed licensed millers and firms with backward-integration programmes to import staples — including maize, husked brown rice, wheat, beans and millet — without paying duties or related taxes. The policy, intended as a temporary measure to ease food inflation, ended in December 2024. Stakeholders say it instead encouraged mass importation that undermined local producers.

Farmers say the import surge has depressed local prices. AFAN’s Ibrahim pointed to maize as an example: where a tonne once fetched about N60,000, it now goes for roughly N30,000, leaving growers unable to cover input costs. Small-scale producers, he said, are abandoning the farm or reducing output because they cannot afford fertilisers, herbicides or other essentials.

Women smallholder farmers raised related complaints. Chinasa Asonye, national secretary of the Small-Scale Women Farmers Organisation in Nigeria, said input costs and poor-quality subsidised products have crippled production. “Fertilisers and herbicides have become unaffordable. Some of the subsidised inputs distributed were expired and caused more harm than good. Government must subsidise inputs so farmers can produce at a reasonable cost,” she said, warning that hoarding by traders and agencies had worsened the crisis.

Asonye also described a glut of poor-quality imports, noting with alarm that some rice batches sold at N48,000 were infested with weevils and “not even edible.” She added that grains purchased at N140 per kg have in some cases been forced down to N70 per kg, pushing many traders and farmers into loss.

Stakeholders argued that piecemeal fixes — duty waivers, price-crash orders or delayed machinery distributions — cannot deliver long-term food security. Dama urged a coordinated strategy that engages millers, farmers and private investors, and warned that continued reliance on import licences will not substitute for real investment in domestic production. “If we continue like this, we will never be food-secure,” he said.

Calling for concrete policy measures, farmers and advocates want quick distribution of mechanisation equipment, subsidies or financing for inputs, investment in storage and transport infrastructure, and a genuine stakeholder consultation process before further price interventions are announced. They also urged transparency over state and private stockpiles to prevent hoarding and speculative pricing.

The government insists its measures — including the transport-route interventions, mechanisation push and plans to encourage import substitution — will eventually ease pressure on consumers. But with imports rising to N2.22tn in six months and local producers struggling with input costs, storage losses and weak domestic demand, experts warn the outlook for Nigeria’s food sector remains fragile unless decisive, coordinated action is taken.

 

Credit: The Punch

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

National Assembly Clerk Denies Role In Natasha Akpoti’s Blockade

Published

on

The Office of the Clerk to the National Assembly has dismissed suggestions that it has the authority to decide whether suspended Kogi Central senator, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, can resume her legislative duties.

In a statement issued on Monday in Abuja, the Director of Information, Mullah Bi-Allah, speaking on behalf of the Clerk, explained that the office functions strictly as an administrative arm of the legislature and cannot review or overturn resolutions of the Senate.

“The Clerk does not possess the authority to review, reverse or interpret Senate decisions,” the statement read.

Akpoti-Uduaghan, a first-term lawmaker elected on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), was suspended by the Senate on March 6, 2025, for six months. Although she challenged the suspension in court, the Federal High Court declined to invalidate the decision, and the matter remains pending at the Court of Appeal.

Earlier this month, the senator had written to the Clerk of the National Assembly notifying the office of her intention to resume legislative duties. However, the Clerk clarified that such correspondence ought to be directed to the Senate President in line with parliamentary protocol.

According to the statement, the Clerk’s office subsequently informed the Senate leadership, which maintained that since the case is still in court, any change in Akpoti-Uduaghan’s status must either come from a new Senate resolution or a binding court order.

The Clerk’s office also expressed concern over a petition by the senator’s legal team accusing it of overreach, stressing that the determination of her resumption lies solely with the Senate.

“It must be emphasised that the question of whether Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan can resume her legislative duties without further resolution of the Senate following the expiration of her suspension lies with the Senate and not with the Clerk to the National Assembly,” Bi-Allah added.

The office reaffirmed its neutrality, stating that it remains guided by constitutional provisions, institutional respect, and the rule of law, and urged the public to allow the Senate and the courts to resolve the matter.

Continue Reading


 

 


 

 

 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular