Connect with us


BIG STORY

Buhari To Atiku: You Are A Thief Shouting Thief On Another

Published

on

President Muhammadu Buhari has described the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party for the 2019 election, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, as a thief calling another thief.

Buhari, who spoke through his campaign spokesperson, Festus Keyamo, on Sunday, said Abubakar has a history of corruption.

The statement by Keyamo reads in full:

A few days ago, the Presidential Candidate of the PDP, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, called out President Muhammadu Buhari over certain allegations of “corrupt practices” which the President allegedly condones in his government. Whilst we have repeatedly addressed each and every of the instances cited by him to show the transparent nature of the government, it is shocking that the Presidential candidate of the main opposition has refused to issue a personal statement up till this minute clarifying in details his record of crass corruption and abuse of office. He is clearly taking Nigerians for a ride and hopes to distort the ethical revolution in public office that Nigerians clearly desire to his own philosophy of abusing public office to promote private interests. By his subliminal messages, he wants Nigerians to accept that becoming wealthy by abusing public office is not a bad thing after all.

With the avalanche of fake and unsubstantiated news released in the last few days, it is now clear that PDP’s strategy in the run up to the elections is to spread fake news and make wild allegations without any proof against the President and the Vice President.

This is clearly to divert attention from the record of crass corruption and abuse of office of their own candidate. Nigerians cannot and should not be insulted by the PDP after 16 years of looting of the nation, by now putting forward a man whose record of corruption they very much acknowledge, but would rather we all overlook it.

Some of the indisputable facts regarding Alhaji Atiku Abubakar are as follows:

  • The U.S Congress in a report titled, KEEPING FOREIGN CORRUPTION OUT OF THE UNITED STATES: FOUR CASE HISTORIES, featured Alhaji Atiku Abubakar as one of the four notorious cases of money laundering in the world!
  • The Congress report said “Jennifer Douglas Abubakar, a U.S. citizen, is the fourth wife of Atiku Abubakar, the former Vice President of Nigeria and a former candidate for the Presidency of Nigeria…… from 2000 to 2008, Ms. Douglas helped her husband bring over $40 million in suspect funds into the United States, including at least $1.7 million in bribe payments from Siemens AG, a German corporation, and over $38 million from little known offshore corporations, primarily LetsGo Ltd. Inc., Guernsey Trust Company Nigeria Ltd., and Sima Holding Ltd”.
  • Atiku’s co-conspirators, Williams Jefferson and Siemens in the bribery deal were convicted and Jefferson went to jail. By running for President of Nigeria, Atiku intends to get some immunity from prosecution. Already he is hoping to obtain a visa to visit the US, as a guest of the State department, a concession that the US will grant to a Presidential candidate of Africa’s biggest Nation.
  • Both the BBC and Voice of America reported that “In a probe ordered by Mr. Obasanjo, (then Nigerian President) the vice-president was accused of diverting $125m from a public development trust fund into his personal businesses.”; Please see 1016 BBC, Profile: Atiku Abubakar, January 25, 2007, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/ 6292141.stm (Voice of America, “Nigerian Vice President Charged with Corruption,” October 10, 2006, http:// www1.voanews.com/english/news/a-).
  •    A Senate subcommittee investigating the PTDF indicted Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, having found that he abused his office by aiding and abetting the diversion of public funds in the sum of $145 million” as loans to his friends. This report was a subject of a full-blown investigation by the EFCC which actually recommended his prosecution in a court of law. That report is still pending and alive till today. How do we as a Nation end up with anyone with this sordid record locally and internationally? We have heard the lame defense that the U.S Justice Department said it has no pending case against Atiku Abubakar. That is only defense for the ignorant ones. In the United States, there are indictments the Justice Department can confirm to the world. But there is another category of indictments known as SEALED INDICTMENTS that the Justice Department cannot confirm to anyone. These indictments are sealed under the orders of a Judge. Alhaji Atiku Abubakar has a sealed indictment waiting for him in the U.S. The day he visits the U.S, not as a candidate in an election, he will face charges. There is no question that the reasons for Atiku’s frequent contests for the Presidency are to steal the resources of Nigeria for self-enrichment and to prevent prosecution for his crimes of laundering and receiving bribes. No amount of fake news or ridiculous false allegations against the President or Vice President that can wash away the well-documented history of theft.We also challenge the PDP to publish a single line in the sub-committee recommendation of the House of Reps on the NEMA Emergency purchases where the report accused the Vice President of embezzlement of funds. They either do this within 24 hours or keep quiet forever. It is even noteworthy that the House of Representatives have not adopted any such recommendation to make it a report of the House.We also challenge them to show any proof whatsoever of their allegations regarding the TraderMoni.After three days of publicly announcing that they have hard proof that the President’s relations bought shares in Etisalat and Keystone Bank, the PDP has not produced a single piece of paper, a document of any sort to buttress the grave allegations it made. This is how shameless and callous the Atiku team has become, all in a desperate bid to get their hands on the public purse. Lastly, we challenge Alhaji Atiku Abubakar for the umpteen time to produce his tax receipts for 2015, 2016 and 2017. It is shocking that a man who has not been paying his Personal Income Taxes now says he wants to “get Nigerians working again” – whatever that means. He is only deceiving himself and not the intelligent Nigerians that we know.
  • Thank you.
  • FESTUS KEYAMO, SAN, FCIArb (UK), Director, Strategic Communications, President Muhammadu Buhari Campaign Organisation.

BIG STORY

Tariff Battle Escalates As Discos Reject Review Talks With States

Published

on

Commissioners of energy from all 36 states announced on Wednesday their intention to engage with electricity distribution companies in discussions aimed at setting fair and affordable electricity tariffs for residents.

This move comes in response to the recent reduction of electricity tariffs for Band A customers by the Enugu Electricity Regulatory Commission, from N209/kWh to N160/kWh—a decision that was met with opposition from both electricity generation and distribution companies.

Despite this, the distribution companies have rejected the idea of entering into tariff negotiations with individual states, warning that such actions by state governments could potentially harm the power sector if not handled properly.

The EERC, meanwhile, has stood firmly by its decision and has shown no signs of backing down in the face of resistance from power generators and distributors. States have also defended their authority to oversee power regulation within their territories.

Recently, the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission revealed that seven states—Enugu, Ondo, Ekiti, Imo, Oyo, Edo, and Kogi—now independently manage their electricity markets under the provisions of the Electricity Act 2023. Additional states, including Lagos, Ogun, Niger, and Plateau, are expected to finalize their transitions by September.

In an interview with The Punch on Wednesday, Prince Eka Williams, Chairman of the Forum of Commissioners of Power and Energy in Nigeria and Commissioner of Power and Renewable Energy in Cross River State, noted that while some states may be financially capable of subsidising electricity for their residents, the primary goal of state governments is to ensure a steady and reliable power supply.

He insisted that the Electricity Act 2023 had empowered the states to regulate the sector in their domains, and resisted attempts to counter this development.

“Without any equivocation, each State Electricity Regulator is uniquely positioned to determine and implement appropriate electricity tariffs that are fair to customers and at the same time, catalyse investments within their electricity markets, depending on their perculiar electricity market dynamics, licensee cost structures, consumer needs, and regulatory assessments,” he stated.

Asked whether state governments were ready to bear the burden of electricity subsidies, as declared by the power minister following the slash in tariffs by Enugu state, Williams replied, “Well, it’s not something I want to unilaterally agree or disagree with. The power sector is currently being tested, and there’s a lot of experimentation going on. There’s no one-size-fits-all approach.

“What’s important is that all stakeholders sit at the table to discuss these issues, taking into account the unique circumstances of each state. States operate differently. So, any governor who feels inclined can say, ‘I’m ready to shoulder this responsibility.’

“I believe what the minister is suggesting is that states can and should have more input in shaping the electricity conversation. But it’s still an ongoing dialogue. It’s not something you can pin down as a definitive statement, it requires extensive consultation and engagement.”

Also, in a statement on Wednesday, the Forum of State Commissioners of Power and Energy said the claims by the power generation companies were unfounded, allaying fears that the decision of Enugu to reduce the tariff of Band A would negatively impact its revenue streams.

The forum, speaking on behalf of the 36 states, said it was ready to negotiate with the Discos operating in their states. However, power distributors told The PUNCH that they were not ready for any negotiation with the states, who they alleged were trying to sabotage the successes recorded in power generation lately.

Recall that states like Lagos, Ondo and Plateau have indicated their interest in slashing tariffs. But the Enugu power regulator insisted that there was no point retaining the Band A tariff at N209/kWh, defending its decision scheduled to take effect from August 1.

Speaking on behalf of the states, the forum Chairman, Williams, and Secretary, Omale Omale, noted that the Enugu government’s policy did not extend to the wholesale market where Gencos operate.

The forum explained that the downward reduction in electricity tariffs by the Enugu Electricity Regulatory Commission was duly aligned with the provisions of the Electricity Act 2023.

The forum also said the new tariff by the Enugu Electricity Regulatory Commission followed a comprehensive and meticulous review process of thorough examination of the capital and operational expenditures and assumptions of MainPower Electricity Distribution Company operating in the state.

“The Enugu Electricity Regulatory Commission carried out a rigorous assessment of MainPower’s existing customer tariffs classification and regulatory assets base of N4.00 kWh on Band A feeders. The EERC, acting within the ambit of its regulatory provisions, has set tariffs approximately based on its findings, aiming for a cost-reflective and fair market for consumers and operators alike,“ the statement read in parts.

While stating that Enugu State based its regulatory findings and specific market conditions on the downward tariff adjustment, the forum noted that this did not amount to other states applying the same approach.

“For instance, several states, Ekiti, Ondo states, and others have issued tariff orders maintaining the present MYTO tariffs,” it stated. FOCPEN assured investors and the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry that states did not arbitrarily reduce tariffs or depend on unsustainable electricity subsidies by the Federal Government.

“On the contrary, states are resolute in their call for the removal of untargeted and opaque federal subsidies, advocating instead for the establishment of truly cost-reflective subnational and wholesale electricity markets. States, including Enugu, are sectors where electricity tariffs accurately reflect the cost of service delivery, thereby encouraging investment and efficiency,” the group added.

It noted that the tariff for wholesale generation and transmission services, which fall under the purview of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission, remains secure and unaffected.

In an interview, the Chief Executive Officer of the Association of Nigerian Electricity Distributors, Sunday Oduntan, said the association would not engage in any negotiation with the states. Oduntan argued that the states were trying to put Nigeria into darkness with the slash in tariffs, saying it is not sustainable.

“We are not negotiating with the states. What they are doing will destroy the market. If they continue like this, the power supply will drop again. Can’t you see that there’s an improvement in power supply these days? Everything will go back if this tariff cut continues in the states. These states just want to create a shortfall. If there’s no funds, there will be a crisis,” Oduntan warned.

Enugu defends position

Meanwhile, the EERC clarified that its recent tariff cut did not tamper with the prevailing cost of power generation in the country in any way. The commission maintained that, based on MainPower’s costs, there was no justification to keep the price of electricity for Band A at N209/kWh in the state.

In a statement by EERC’s Commissioner for Electricity Market Operations, Reuben Okoye, the agency maintained that although it inherited the current tariff regime, “the commission is focused on developing a sub-national electricity market that is transparent, accountable, reliable and sustainable and therefore will review utility costs of service to achieve its mandate to the people of Enugu.”

EERC further clarified, “The Order is for MainPower’s operation in Enugu State. It does not affect electricity services in other states, between states and across the country. The cost of delivering electricity from the national Grid to MainPower via EEDC has been accommodated in full. We did not tamper with that cost at all in our tariff determination, but rather adopted it.

“Our order ensures that MainPower recovers all its efficient costs and makes a reasonable return in its business of providing electricity services to citizens of Enugu State. Considerations and reconsiderations of the MainPower tariff application and data still present the same outcome that ensures full payment of invoices to all parties.”

On the justification for tariff reduction, EERC said that “having gone through its rigorous process, EERC has no rationale or justification to keep Band A at N209” in the state.

“EERC has not removed a kobo from the generation and transmission costs of delivering power to Enugu State, but rather included the exact costs to ensure complete payment of MainPower’s portion of the Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading Plc invoices. Also, MainPower’s share of EEDC’s debts arising from CBN’s interventions in the NESI was included in the tariff.

“EERC and MainPower also reviewed all the relevant data/information provided by MainPower for its tariff determination to ensure accuracy,” it was stated.

The agency said it would be willing to entertain any evidence that showed that its calculations were wrong. “We are willing to entertain any evidence that shows that our methodology, analysis, computation, and output are wrong. The total focus on the reduction of Band A tariff by some commentators is rather unfair to the commission and to electricity consumers in Enugu State.

“It is important to say that with the ongoing migration of more customers to Band A, the general cost of delivering electricity is spread across larger customer numbers, which should also result in a reduced cost of service delivery,” EERC added.

Continuing, the commission noted that the emerging issue or question is: should customers in Enugu State be over-billed for electricity services, and if so, for whose benefit?

“The fact remains that Gencos will not get the over-recovery from any Subco until a cost-reflective tariff is adopted across the board in the country. So, their present concerns are misdirected. We stand ready to provide clarification as well as engage concerned stakeholders so as to provide assurances regarding the order.

“Again, for emphasis, let us be clear that this tariff Order is only applicable to Enugu State, as it was developed after considering the circumstances, information and data of MainPower in the state,” the statement said.

The commission, therefore, invited Gencos that are ready to operate with effective contracts based on a willing-buyer, willing-seller commercial arrangement to consider setting up power plants in Enugu State.

“We will consider and approve the PPA and tariff for them to do their business, as the PPA cost will be a natural pass-through in the tariff,” EERC concluded.

The Lagos State Commissioner for Energy and Mineral Resources, Biodun Ogunleye, has lamented that the state’s effort to control electricity is being frustrated by electricity distribution companies in the state.

“You know we are battling with our Discos; they are not in agreement with anything we are doing, and the Discos are the ones behind this amendment bill that is in the Senate,” he said.

He explained that, unlike Enugu, the efforts to negotiate things are “increasingly difficult” but noted that Lagos would soon announce its tariff plan from next week.

 

Credit: The Punch

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Reps Approve $347m Loan For Lagos-Calabar Highway, Others

Published

on

The House of Representatives on Wednesday granted approval to President Bola Tinubu’s request to borrow $347m as part of the 2025–2026 borrowing plan.

Speaker of the House, Tajudeen Abbas, read the President’s letter during Wednesday’s plenary session in the Green Chamber.

In the letter, the President explained that the loan is needed due to an increase in funding requirements for the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, whose cost rose by $47m, from $700m to $747m.

He clarified that at the time the borrowing plan was submitted to the National Assembly, the lead arranger had only secured up to $700m in financing commitments, and the remaining funds had to be sourced from export credit agencies.

“It is, therefore, necessary to increase the value of the financing for the project by $47m to ensure it aligns with the loan size agreed in the finance documents for the project,” the President stated.

He also highlighted that $300m is required for the Nigerian universal communications access project, a major telecommunications initiative aimed at closing the digital divide through the installation of 7,000 telecom towers in underserved rural areas.

Back in May, Tinubu had submitted a request for legislative approval of a broader borrowing plan amounting to $21.54bn, €2.19bn, and ¥15bn, along with a €65m grant.

With the addition of $47m for the highway and $300m for the telecom project, the initial borrowing figure of $21.54bn has now increased to $21.89bn.

On Wednesday, the House adopted a report by Abubakar Nalaraba, chairman of the House Committee on Aids, Loans and Debt Management.

Nalaraba noted that although borrowing levels have increased, Nigeria’s debt load “remains sustainable.”

He said the nation’s debt-to-GDP ratio, at around 50 percent of over N145tn, is still within the international threshold of 56 percent.

He also noted that the administration has managed to bring down the debt service-to-revenue ratio from over 90 percent to under 70 percent.

The Federal Government’s ability to service the new debt, he said, is strengthened by expected revenue increases from the Nigerian Tax Act 2025, which is projected to rise by over 18 percent annually starting in 2026.

Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu, who presided over the session after the Speaker’s departure, formally approved the borrowing request.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Tinubu, Osinbajo, Governors To Attend APC NEC Meeting As Party Plans Tribute For Buhari

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu is expected to lead key figures of the All Progressives Congress to the national executive committee meeting of the party scheduled for Thursday.

Expected attendees include Vice-President Kashim Shettima, former Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo, governors, former governors, and members of the national working committee.

The NEC is set to include a brief tribute to honour the late former President Muhammadu Buhari.

This gathering marks the first major APC assembly since Buhari’s passing.

One of the main issues to be addressed is the selection of a new national chairman to replace Abdullahi Ganduje following his resignation.

According to party insiders, the NEC meeting will be expanded to include members of the national caucus, as the traditional caucus meeting—normally held the day before—was cancelled due to logistical reasons.

The APC constitution lists the NEC membership to include the national chairman, deputy national chairmen for both regions, the national secretary and deputy, six zonal vice-chairmen, and the national legal adviser.

Additional members comprise the deputy legal adviser, national and deputy treasurers, national and deputy financial secretaries, national and deputy organising secretaries, national and deputy publicity secretaries, national and deputy welfare secretaries, national and deputy auditors, national and deputy women and youth leaders, the special leader for persons with disabilities, zonal secretaries, youth and women leaders, and the party’s state chairmen.

Also part of the NEC are the president and vice-president, the senate president and deputy, the speaker and deputy speaker of the house of representatives, governors from the APC, and principal officers of the national assembly affiliated with the party.

Each geopolitical zone is to be represented by two nominated senators and three nominated house of representatives members.

There are also six ex-officio members elected from each zone, along with the chairman, deputy chairman, and secretary of the Board of Trustees.

The party constitution also outlines a national caucus which includes current and past presidents and vice-presidents, serving and former national officers, leaders of the national assembly, governors, presidential and vice-presidential candidates, the SGF, and BoT leaders.

In a statement released on Wednesday, APC national publicity secretary Felix Morka announced a change in the meeting’s venue and time.

The NEC meeting will now take place at the Banquet Hall of the Presidential Villa in Abuja at 2pm.

Continue Reading



 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular