Connect with us


BIG STORY

APC Promises Heavy Defeat As Atiku Targets 2027 Presidential Bid

Published

on

The All Progressives Congress has waved off the reported plan by the Peoples Democratic Party presidential candidate in the 2023 election, Atiku Abubakar, to contest the 2027 election.

The APC Director of Publicity, Bala Ibrahim, in an interview with The PUNCH on Wednesday, described Atiku’s 2027 ambition as the most laughable news of 2024. He said the former vice-president would be defeated again.

The spokesperson for the ex-vice president, Daniel Bwala, had on Tuesday night confirmed that his principal would contest again the presidential election in 2027.

Atiku attempted to become Nigeria’s President six times but was unsuccessful in 1993, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023.

After the Supreme Court affirmed President Bola Tinubu as the winner of the 2023 election in which he came second, Atiku hinted that he was not retiring from politics and pledged his readiness to continue to shape the democratic discourse.

He had said, “As for me and my party, this phase of our work is done. However, I am not going away. For as long as I breathe, I will continue to struggle with other Nigerians to deepen our democracy and rule of law and for the kind of political and economic restructuring, the country needs to reach its true potential.

“That struggle should now be led by the younger generations of Nigeria who have even more stake than my generation.”

But speaking in an interview on Channels television on Tuesday night, Bwala described Atiku as the president Nigeria never had.

Responding to a question on whether Atiku would contest in the 2027 presidential election, the lawyer said, “Sure, he would run. He has the capacity, he has the wisdom, he has the knowledge, he has the energy.

”And he is a president we never had. Because to be honest with you, if any politician understands the private sector very well, it is Atiku Abubakar and our economy can only come alive if there is a private sector-led economy. He’s the president the country is missing because of his experience and capacity.’’

Commenting on Bwala’s disclosure, the PDP Deputy Publicity Secretary, Ibrahim Abdullahi, said it was a welcome development, but countered the insinuation that the 2027 presidential ambition of some leaders might put the party in limbo, adding that the PDP must galvanize, harmonize, and mobilize support ahead of 2027.

  • PDP Commends Atiku

Abdullahi in a chat with one of our correspondents, stated, “It( PDP) is a political party. The ultimate objective and goal of a political party is to produce leadership. So, if people are interested in vying for the presidency, governorship, Senate, or whatever office in 2027 on the platform of the PDP, I don’t think they should begin to mobilise because that is one way you can keep a political party going.”

On the timing, he said “You cannot just wake up in the morning and instruct people not to nurse ambition. Then, it is not a political party. I understand the question to mean if they continue to promote their political ambition, it will be to the detriment of the political party; no, that is not correct.

“What I know as a politician: Politics is about ambition, politics is about interests. So, if people start jostling for power now, ahead of 2027 as you see it, it is not too early.

“There’s a need for them to cross the file and rank to ensure that they promote it in a healthy atmosphere, and that will keep the political party afloat. So, I am of the view that it is a healthy development. They should be allowed to do it once it is within the confines of the law.

“We’re not just expecting people to go campaigning now or rallying for support, but what they want to do is to promote the party and to be able to indicate interest in certain offices. It’s a healthy development.”

However, the APC publicity director Wednesday Atiku would lose the 2027 presidential election heavily. According to him, the former Vice-President does not have any political value.

On whether Atiku’s ambition is a threat to the APC, Ibrahim said “Our party, which is the All Progressive Congress, thrashed Atiku not once, not twice. Even when we thought he had the energy and little credibility to make him viable to Nigerians, we defeated him completely.

“How can someone who is just trying to regain his balance be a threat to the APC come 2027? That is unthinkable; Atiku can never be a threat to the APC. He wasn’t a threat when he had little value. How can he be a threat when he is already valueless? It’s a dream that will not come to pass.’’

The party spokesman advised the ex-VP to quit politics, noting that he was being misled by his aides and political associates.

  • APC Knocks Former Vice President

Ibrahim added, “Atiku should better forget about politics completely. I think this is the imagination of Bwala and a few others around him. And it only goes to tell you that Atiku is surrounded by people who mislead him because anybody who has real feelings and concern for Atiku will not advise him to run against Tinubu again; not in the far future.

“This is not an issue of concern to the APC at all. Atiku is not a force to reckon with. He has never been a force to reckon with and he cannot be in 2027 when he must have diminished in terms of political value. We have not gotten to the bridge, but when we get there we will cross it.”

Some opposition political parties agreed that Atiku had the right to pursue his presidential ambition in 2027.

The New Nigeria People’s Party noted that though Atiku reserved the right to aspire to any political office of his choice, 2027 appears too far away to warrant a conversation yet.

The spokesman for the NNPP Presidential Campaign Council in the 2023 election, Ladipo Johnson, reasoned that a lot of events might happen between now and 2027 that could render the conversation around the subject unnecessary.

He said, “Daniel Bwala has the right to say whatever he wants regarding the ambition of his principal but it is left for Nigerians to decide what they want. Year 2027 is a long way to go and I think it will be improper to start a conversation around it. It is too early.

“In fairness to him, Atiku has the right to contest as many times as he wants. From now to 2027, a lot may happen. Let’s see how events play out.”

  • Support Obi — Yunusa Tank

But the spokesman for the 2023 Labour Party Presidential Campaign Council, Yunusa Tanko in an interview with The PUNCH on Wednesday said Nigerians were tired of Atiku and others from the “old stock.”

Tanko, who said Obi would contest the 2027 presidential election, said the former Anambra State governor wanted to see Nigeria working for all.

He said “Anybody who wants to show ambition and start building at the moment, it is the person’s fundamental rights. But, we believe that we have the interest of people at heart. And the people are tilting towards us, especially the Nigerian youths. They are tired of the old stock.

“So even if anybody coming from the old stock still wants to run for election, we wish him all the best. But it could have been better for them to support a younger generation like Peter Obi in the form of uniting this country so that we can move forward collectively. That will have made more sense and more appreciative to the Nigerian people at the moment.

When asked whether Obi would contest the 2027 election, he said “ That one is sure. There is no ambiguity on that, that one is sure.”

He stated, “Obi prefers to see a Nigeria that is working, it is not his ambition that is most paramount. His interest is to see Nigeria working for everybody.”

However, the National Secretary of the Social Democratic Party, Mr Olu Agunloye, argued that there was nothing wrong with the ambition of the former vice president.

“The right to run for an election is reserved for all qualified Nigerians, including Atiku, and in 2027, a lot of people will throw their hats in the ring. So, I don’t see anything wrong with the aspiration of Atiku to run for the Presidency again.

“Yes, after losing his case at the Supreme Court, he called on the opposition to close ranks to stand a chance of dislodging the APC. That was a good call. But if you are asking for the position of the SDP on this, there is no way our party will support Atiku because we will field a presidential candidate come 2027,” he said.

In his usual blunt style, the 2023 presidential candidate of the Action African Alliance, Omoyele Sowore, dismissed Atiku’s chances in 2027, noting that though he is likely to contest, he would lose again.

“Atiku is a serial contestant and a serial loser. He’s got nothing to offer now or in the future,” Sowore said.

The Executive Director, YouthHub Africa, Rotimi Olawale, said the ex-VP was within his rights to contest again, adding, however, that older politicians should rather support and get behind younger aspirants.

“A government has barely even spent the first year in office. I think it is too early to predict what can happen over the next four years. Atiku is within his rights to contest the Presidency in 2027.

“My biggest advice would be that many of the old folks should yield the floor and support a younger generation of leaders to emerge across Nigeria,” he admonished.

Also in his contribution, the National Publicity Secretary of the Young Progressives Party, Wale Egbeola- Martins, said, “It is within the constitutional rights of any qualified Nigerian to aspire for the highest office in the land just as it is within the rights of electorates to reject or accept any individual through the ballot.

“It is too early in the day to start speculating whether Atiku Abubakar will contest in 2027 as the task before us now is ensuring good governance by holding the government in power accountable.

“While Atiku is eminently qualified to contest in 2027, the position of the YPP has always been that young, visionary, dynamic, and mentally progressive individuals without greed should be supported to leadership at all levels including becoming the President, hence effectively excluding Alhaji Atiku Abubakar as an option.’’

 

Credit: The Punch

BIG STORY

Power Interrupted: Wike And The Naval Officer’s Quiet Defiance — By Babajide E. Ikuyajolu

Published

on

Public Work or Defiance?

In a country where power often speaks louder than law, the recent confrontation between FCT Minister Nyesom Wike and a Naval officer did more than spark an argument. It stirred something deeper about how Nigerians now see authority.

The video showed what many described as an altercation: Wike visibly angry, the naval officer standing firm, refusing to yield. In a different setting, it might have been a routine exchange of hierarchy. But Nigeria is no longer a place where power goes unquestioned, and that made the moment explode into fascination and quiet applause.

Between Law and Ego

Inside military circles, there is a colloquial expression called “Two Fighting”. It is not a written law, but a saying, used when a senior officer assaults a junior one without legal justification or outside military boundaries. It captures a simple truth whispered in the barracks: rank may command obedience, but it should never erase dignity.

Yet, this was not two fighting. This was a civilian political authority confronting a uniformed officer, a delicate space between governance and discipline, between civil power and uniformed restraint.

By law, Ministers direct policies, not soldiers. The Armed Forces Act makes clear that obedience belongs within a defined chain of command. So while Wike may have carried political weight, the officer’s calm refusal stood on the firmer ground of legality, and perhaps morality too.

Still, power has its own dialect, and sometimes ego translates it louder than law.

The Street’s Verdict

If the law spoke in nuance, the people spoke in certainty. Nigerians did not see a minister enforcing order. They saw a man in power trying to impose himself, and a naval officer who refused to bow.

Across motor parks, offices, and social media timelines, one thing was constant: Admiration. Not necessarily for defiance, but for composure. The officer’s restraint felt like a collective release, the kind that says, “At least someone stood up today.”

It was not rebellion they saw. It was representation. For once, someone in uniform seemed to mirror the quiet dignity Nigerians wish their leaders would show.

The Weight of Punishment

Yet, within the military, hierarchy remains sacred. Technically, the officer could face disciplinary action, not for fighting, but for the embarrassment the episode brought.

But here is where the lines blur again: when a man in uniform is punished for restraint, the public does not see discipline. They see injustice. And in a country already brimming with silent anger, such a message can ripple far beyond the barracks.

Because military men are Nigerians too. Their uniforms may set them apart, but their frustrations are rooted in the same soil. When one of them is made a scapegoat for showing composure, the people watching from the sidelines feel it personally. Their silence starts to sound like protest waiting for a trigger.

Sometimes it takes very little for collective irritation to turn into open defiance, not from hate, but from exhaustion.

The Balance We Need

Moments like this test more than authority; they test perception. They force a country to ask if power can coexist with fairness.

What the situation needs is not punishment or spectacle, but Arbitration, the kind that listens before it judges. Because the more openly government can resolve such tensions, the more quietly the people begin to believe again.

Arbitration here is not just about a verdict; it is about trust. It is the government telling its citizens, “We can be firm without being cruel.” That message alone can hold back the tide of cynicism rising in the hearts of those who have stopped expecting justice to ever look familiar.

Beneath the Outburst

This incident was never about a fence, a title, or a patch of land. It was about something far more human, the way Nigerians now relate to those who hold authority over them.

They are not anti-leadership. They are simply weary of the kind that confuses service with status.

That is why Wike’s anger did not register as zeal for order, but as the old sound of entitlement. And why the naval officer’s restraint felt like a glimpse of the Nigeria people still hope for, a place where discipline and dignity do not cancel each other out.

The Echo

Maybe this was not about who was right or wrong. Maybe it was about what happens when power finally meets a kind of calm it cannot command.

Because in that brief standoff, Nigerians did not just see an officer.

They saw themselves, standing tall, unarmed, but finally unwilling to move.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

JUST IN: Federal Government Suspends Implementation Of 15% PMS, Diesel Import Duty

Published

on

The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) has announced that the previously proposed 15 per cent ad-valorem import duty on Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) and Automotive Gas Oil (diesel) will no longer be implemented.

George Ene-Ita, Director of the Public Affairs Department at NMDPRA, issued the update on Wednesday, urging the public to avoid panic buying of petroleum products.

The import tariff had been approved by President Bola Tinubu on October 29, following a submission from the Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service, Zacch Adedeji. The proposal sought to apply a 15 per cent duty on the cost, insurance, and freight (CIF) value of imported petrol and diesel, aiming to align import costs with domestic market realities. Implementation was originally scheduled to begin on November 21, 2025.

In its statement, NMDPRA clarified that the government is no longer pursuing the implementation of the fuel import duty. “It should also be noted that the implementation of the 15% ad-valorem import duty on imported Premium Motor Spirit and Diesel is no longer in View,” the agency stated.

The authority also assured Nigerians that the country has an adequate supply of petroleum products, meeting the national sufficiency threshold, even during this period of peak demand.

This suspension comes amid concerns from stakeholders about potential price increases and market disruptions that could have resulted from the import duty. The NMDPRA emphasized that the move is aimed at maintaining stability in fuel supply and preventing undue hardship for consumers.

President Tinubu’s initial approval had reflected a broader policy to regulate fuel imports and align them with domestic economic realities, but the suspension indicates a recalibration in response to public and market considerations.

NMDPRA continues to monitor the fuel market to ensure sufficient supply and smooth distribution across the country, urging citizens to adhere to official guidance and avoid hoarding.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Obidient Movement’s Mobilisation Director, Morris Monye Resigns; Says Obi Doesn’t Care About Local Structure, No Financial Support

Published

on

The Director of Mobilisation for the Obidient Movement, Morris Monye, has resigned from his position, citing poor coordination within the group and the strain of personally funding its activities.

In a statement released via his X handle on Thursday, Monye expressed frustration over what he described as weak organisational structure and lack of support from the movement’s leadership, which he said led to a poor outing in the recently concluded Anambra governorship election.

Monye stated, “Almost a year down the line, most of our short, medium, and long-term plans have not been met. I won’t be part of optics and no work. The poor showing at the Anambra election has also made my position untenable.”

He disclosed that he had personally financed the group’s nationwide mobilisation drives, covering travel expenses, voter awareness campaigns, local structure support, and logistics — all without any financial assistance from the leadership or the presidential candidate of the Labour Party, Peter Obi.

Monye added, “No money was given to the Directorate of Mobilisation. There’s no bank account even for the directorate. In fact, Mr Peter Obi has never asked what we are doing in mobilisation — no communication, nothing.”

The former director also alleged that his role attracted harassment and intimidation from government supporters and security agencies. He said the constant pressure and lack of security took a toll on him and his family.

“It’s a role that paints a target on your back. I’ve had to remain silent so as not to discourage anyone or appear to be complaining, but it has taken a toll on me and my family, who can hardly understand it all,” he stated.

Monye highlighted several of his contributions to the movement, including creating an online registration platform for members, reviving inactive support groups, setting up regional and local offices, and launching the Obidient NextGen university campus network.

He noted that he also helped raise campaign funds for the Obidient candidate in the Anambra election and began an initiative to equip polling unit agents with affordable body cameras for transparency — a project he urged his successor to complete.

According to him, “The next director must follow up on this. We have not closed it out yet. You can’t run a campaign simply from general goodwill. This is not 2023. The element of surprise is gone.”

Reflecting on his tenure, Monye described his service in the Obidient Movement as a “privilege” but said it was time for “someone else to carry the mantle.”

Morris Monye, known as one of the movement’s prominent figures, played a key role in its early mobilisation phase. The Obidient Movement, inspired by Peter Obi’s 2023 presidential campaign, evolved into a grassroots political force largely driven by youthful supporters and social media advocacy.

As of press time, the leadership of the movement, including the National Coordinator, Dr. Yunusa Tanko, had yet to issue a response to Monye’s resignation or the concerns he raised.

Continue Reading


 

 


 

 

 

 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular