Connect with us


BIG STORY

UPDATE: Diddy To Appear In Court Before New Judge In Sex-Trafficking Case

Published

on

Sean ‘Diddy‘ Combs is scheduled to make his initial appearance before a new judge overseeing his trial on charges related to sex trafficking.

The rapper was taken into custody on September 16 for charges involving sex trafficking and racketeering.

Robyn Tarnofsky, a US magistrate judge, ordered that Diddy remain in jail while awaiting trial. This decision followed his plea of not guilty to the 14-page federal indictment.

Diddy has also been accused of sexually abusing 120 additional individuals, including a 9-year-old boy.

On Thursday, he will be brought to Manhattan federal court from a Brooklyn jail to appear before Arun Subramanian, the newly appointed judge.

The hearing is expected to set deadlines for both sides to submit arguments, determining the scope of the trial. Diddy’s legal team is aiming for a trial date in April or May next year.

Prosecutors have not yet indicated a preferred timeline for the trial.

Subramanian was assigned to the case after a different judge stepped down due to prior relationships with the lawyers involved.

Diddy maintains his plea of not guilty. His lawyers have repeatedly sought bail since his arrest.

However, two judges have ruled that he remains a threat to the community if released.

Three weeks ago, at a bail hearing, a judge denied a $50 million bail package, which included home detention and electronic monitoring, after determining that Diddy posed a risk of witness tampering and obstruction of the ongoing investigation.

Janice Combs, Diddy’s mother, recently came to his defense, stating he is “not the monster people have painted him to be.”

BIG STORY

Return To Work Immediately Or Face Legal Action, Wike Tells FCTA Workers As Court Orders Strike Suspension

Published

on

The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, on Tuesday warned striking staff of the Federal Capital Territory Administration to return to work immediately or face legal action, following a National Industrial Court ruling ordering an end to the strike that has disrupted public services in Abuja for over a week.

Briefing journalists shortly after the court’s decision, Wike insisted that the rule of law must prevail and accused political actors of exploiting the industrial action for motives unrelated to workers’ welfare.

“The administration was already in the process of mediation when some politicians hijacked the strike,” he said, adding that several of the workers’ demands were “frivolous” and either unreasonable or already addressed.

Wike said the FCTA approached the court after determining that the strike had been “hijacked by politicians,” despite ongoing dialogue and attention to a substantial number of workers’ concerns.

He highlighted the administration’s efforts to support staff welfare, including salary payments and reforms within the civil service.

The minister disclosed that more than N12bn had just been approved for the payment of January salaries to FCTA workers, describing the move as evidence of the government’s commitment to its workforce.

Pointing to improved revenue performance under his leadership, Wike noted that the FCT had generated over N30bn in internally generated revenue, a significant increase compared with previous years.

He urged workers to recognise reforms implemented by the administration, including the establishment of the Civil Service Commission and infrastructure investments across the territory.

“Workers are largely responsible for the lack of development in states, including the FCT,” he said.

Wike dismissed circulating reports suggesting he had been forced out of his office during protests linked to the strike.

“I was never chased out of the office,” he said, explaining that he had merely stepped out to see President Bola Tinubu off at the airport.

Adopting a firm stance, the minister warned against further disruptions of government operations.

“Anyone who dares to lock the gates again will be made a scapegoat, because the law must be obeyed.”

He alleged that some senior civil service officials had played a role in sustaining the strike, claiming that certain directors were instigating the action, but said this would not prevent the administration from pursuing the right course.

Wike emphasised that engagement between workers and the government did not require direct access to him personally.

“Seeing me in person is not a right,” he said, noting that workers’ representatives had been in discussions with management throughout the dispute.

He concluded by warning that staff who failed to comply with the court order and resume duties immediately would face legal action, signalling a tougher enforcement phase as the FCTA seeks to restore full public services.

Workers of the FCTA, operating under the Joint Union Action Committee, had embarked on an indefinite strike on January 19 over unresolved welfare concerns.

The National Industrial Court issued an interlocutory injunction stopping the strike after an application by Wike.

Justice E.D. Subilim granted the order on January 21 and adjourned the suit to March 23, 2026, for hearing of the substantive case.

Delivering his ruling on Tuesday, Justice Subilim said the defendants’ right to strike was not absolute.

“The defendant’s right to an industrial action is not absolute, but as circumscribed by law,” he said. He prohibited workers from participating in the strike once a dispute had been referred to the court and ordered that any ongoing strike must cease pending determination.

“An order of interlocutory injunction is hereby granted, restraining the defendants and respondents, their agents, representatives… together with all other members of the Joint Unions Action Committee … from further embarking on any industrial action, strike, picketing, lockout, or any other form of obstruction against the claimant, parastatals, and political appointees,” the judge added.

Counsel for the claimants, James Onoja (SAN), hailed the court’s decision, urging the unions to obey the order and return to work while allowing room for mediation.

“We commend the court for making an order for the stopping of the strike… I think this is commendable because it will allow the parties to discuss. Our plea to the Union is to allow industrial harmony. They should go back to work and allow for mediation,” Onoja said.

Counsel for the respondents, Maxwell Opara, described the workers as law-abiding citizens and said he would advise the unions to respect the court order.

“The workers are law-abiding citizens. We are going to advise them to respect the court. The one good thing is that the court has also mandated that we commence mediation, not as a matter of advice, in line with the law… we must comply with it,” Opara said.

JUAC President, Rifkatu Iortyer, confirmed that workers would comply, call off the strike and immediately return to work while continuing to “push for other things.”

“We are law-abiding citizens, and because they have said we should return to work, we are returning to work, pending our next appearance,” she said.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Judicial Reforms: Tinubu Proposes Virtual Hearings, Increases Appeal Court Justices To 110

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu has transmitted an executive bill to the Senate seeking to amend the Court of Appeal Act to increase the number of justices from 70 to 110.

The proposed amendment also aims to modernize appellate court proceedings through the introduction of virtual hearings and the establishment of an Alternative Dispute Resolution Centre (ADRC) within the Court of Appeal.

Notice of the bill was contained in a letter read by the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, during the plenary on Tuesday.

In the letter, Mr Tinubu said the amendment is intended to strengthen the institutional capacity, efficiency, and effectiveness of the Court of Appeal in line with constitutional provisions and evolving realities in the justice sector.

“The bill seeks to increase the number of justices of the Court of Appeal from 70 to 110 and provide clarification of judicial structure and seniority,” the president said.

He added that the bill introduces a restructuring of the ranking system within the court, including provisions on the ranking of the president of the Court of Appeal and the determination of seniority among justices.

On the proposed ADR Centre, Mr Tinubu explained that the initiative would allow certain appellate matters to be resolved outside the conventional court process.

“The bill provides for the conduct of proceedings of the Court of Appeal through electronic and audio means, and the establishment of an Alternative Dispute Resolution Centre (ADRC).

“The bill seeks to establish an Alternative Dispute Resolution Centre within the Court of Appeal, where appellate matters may be referred for settlement,” the president added.

Reasons For Reforms

The president said the reforms are designed to improve professional efficiency and legal certainty in appellate practice in line with modern institutional standards.

He noted that the amendment will also update terminology and definitions in the principal Act, including the formal recognition of virtual hearings and modern correctional nomenclature.

“The bill also seeks to update terminology and definitions within the principal Act, including the recognition of virtual hearings and modern correctional nomenclature,” he said.

“It seeks to consolidate interpretative provisions to ensure clarity, consistency, and alignment with the current legal and institutional framework.”

Mr Tinubu noted that the amendment has become necessary due to the increasing workload at the appellate court and is expected to reduce delays in the administration of justice, strengthen access to justice, and promote public confidence in the judiciary.

Federal High Court Amendment Bill

In a separate letter, the president also transmitted a bill seeking to amend the Federal High Court Act to increase the number of judges from 70 to 90.

He further requested the Senate to screen and confirm the nomination of Oyewole Kayode as a Justice of the Supreme Court.

After the letters were read, Mr Akpabio referred the amendment bills and the nomination to the Senate Committee on Rules and Business for further legislative action.

The committee, whose responsibility lies solely in designing the Senate’s legislative agenda, is expected to list the bills on the Order Paper for Wednesday’s plenary for first reading.

If the Senate so decides, the bills may be scheduled immediately for second reading, during which the Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, will lead debate on their general principles and clauses, after which they will be referred to the Committee on Judiciary and Human Rights for public hearing.

 

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Lagos Assembly Debunks Abuja House Rumour, Warns Against Election Season Propaganda

Published

on

The Lagos State House of Assembly has described as misleading and mischievous the widespread misinformation that it budgeted for the purchase of houses in Abuja for its members in the 2026 Appropriation Law.

This rebuttal is contained in a statement jointly signed by Hon. Stephen Ogundipe, Chairman, House Committee on Information, Strategy, and Security, and Hon. Sa’ad Olumoh, Chairman, House Committee on Economic Planning and Budget.

Describing the report as a deliberate and disturbing falsehood being peddled by patently ignorant people, the statement reads, “There is no provision whatsoever in the 2026 Budget for the purchase of houses in Abuja or anywhere else for members of the Lagos State House of Assembly. The report is a complete fabrication and a product of political mischief intended to misinform the public.
“The Lagos State House of Assembly does not operate in Abuja. Our constitutional responsibilities, constituencies, and legislative duties are entirely within Lagos State. It is, therefore, illogical, irrational, and irresponsible for anyone to suggest that legislators would appropriate public funds for personal housing outside their jurisdiction.”
The statement emphasized that the budget is already in the public domain and accessible for scrutiny by discerning Lagosians and Nigerians alike. It reiterated that the Lagos State Government operates a transparent budget that speaks to the needs of the people and the demands of a megalopolis.
“We view this rumour as part of a wider attempt at election-season propaganda, designed to erode public trust, sow discord, and malign democratic institutions.”

The chairmen further clarified that the 2026 capital expenditure of the House of Assembly is less than 0.04% of the total CAPEX of the state, which clearly demonstrates the culture of prudence, accountability, and fiscal responsibility that guides the legislature. However, they noted, “Historically, the House does not even access up to its approved budget in many fiscal years.”

They stressed that the Assembly remains fully committed to excellence, transparency, good governance, and the collective welfare of the people of Lagos State, in line with the objectives of the 2026 Budget of Shared Prosperity.
“We therefore challenge those behind this harebrained allegation to produce credible evidence or retract their statements forthwith. Failure to do so may attract appropriate legal actions.
“We urge Lagosians and the general public to disregard this baseless rumour and always verify information from official and credible sources.”

Continue Reading


 

 


 

 

 

 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular


Warning: Undefined array key "slug" in /home/porsch10/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php on line 2117

Warning: Undefined array key "slug" in /home/porsch10/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php on line 2117

Warning: Undefined array key "slug" in /home/porsch10/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php on line 2117