Traditional leaders and important figures from Ibadanland and Ogbomosoland have strongly objected to a proposed legal change by the Oyo State House of Assembly. This amendment aims to make the Alaafin of Oyo the permanent chairman of the state’s Council of Obas and Chiefs.
This opposition was formally expressed in a joint statement issued on Monday in Ibadan. The statement was signed by Mogajis, Baales, monarchs, the Central Council of Ibadan Indigenes, the Ibadan Compounds Peace Initiative, prominent individuals from Ibadanland, and Mogajis from the Soun Ruling Houses of Ogbomoso.
The bill intended to modify the chieftaincy law, which would establish the Alaafin as the permanent chairman of the council, successfully passed its second reading in the Oyo State House of Assembly last Thursday. This indicates the bill has progressed through an initial stage of legislative consideration.
The legislative session during which the bill was discussed was presided over by the Speaker, Adebo Ogundoyin. Following the second reading, “the bill was subsequently referred to the House Committee on Local Government and Chieftaincy Matters for further scrutiny.” This referral signifies the next step in the legislative process, involving a more detailed examination of the proposed amendment.
The bill proposes to make the Alaafin the “presiding authority of the Oyo State Council of Obas.” This would grant the Alaafin a central and permanent leadership role within the council of traditional rulers.
The bill further suggests that if the Alaafin is absent, the Olubadan of Ibadanland would preside over the council. Additionally, if both the Alaafin and the Olubadan are absent, the Soun of Ogbomoso would assume the chairmanship. This outlines a proposed hierarchy for presiding over the council in different scenarios.
However, the traditional leaders and stakeholders have condemned the proposed amendment. They describe it as “a distortion of historical tradition and an affront to other royal institutions in the state.” This strong criticism highlights their deep concern about the potential impact of the bill.
“The chairmanship of the council has always been rotational and should remain so to reflect fairness and equity among all royal stools in the state,” the statement emphasized. This quote articulates the core of their opposition, stressing the importance of maintaining a rotational leadership to ensure equal representation.
The President of the Ibadan Mogajis, Asimiyu Ariori, and the ICPI Coordinator, Nurudeen Akinade, reiterated that their opposition was not based on personal gain. Instead, they stated it is “rooted in historical precedent and a desire to ensure unity and peace across the state.” This emphasizes the principles guiding their stance.
They cautioned the House against creating “unnecessary tension,” urging lawmakers to “respect tradition and uphold the rotational leadership model for the Council of Obas and Chiefs.” This plea calls for the preservation of existing customs and the avoidance of actions that could disrupt harmony.
“The respect we have for the immediate past Alaafin, Oba Lamidi Adeyemi III, was because of his relationship with the traditional institutions and some distinguished personalities in Ibadanland,” they said. “We respected and honoured Oba Adeyemi’s age and wisdom. He spent over 50 years on the throne before his demise, yet he never disrespected the Ibadan people. The current Alaafin should tread softly.”