Connect with us


BIG STORY

JUST IN: FG Set To Increase Electricity Tariff For Band B And C Customers

Published

on

The Federal Government has revealed plans to standardize electricity tariffs in an effort to address inconsistencies in the current billing system and promote investment in the power sector.

The Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, disclosed this during the ongoing public presentation of the National Integrated Electricity Policy and Nigeria Integrated Resource Plan on Thursday in Abuja.

He explained that the government is considering this option due to the slow pace of migration to Band A customers, which he attributed to the unwillingness of Distribution Companies to make the necessary investments.

Under the existing structure, customers in Band B, who receive 18 to 17 hours of electricity supply, are charged N63 per kilowatt-hour, while those in Band A, with just two more hours of supply, pay N209 per kilowatt-hour.

Adelabu described this as “unfair” and emphasized the need for tariff regularisation to establish a more balanced and equitable pricing system.

The minister stated, “We will look at the tariff again. I am not saying that we’re going to increase the tariff before I am misquoted.

“We are going to review it and see how we can improve upon our modest achievement of last year, not only to ensure that we grow the sector that we need but also to ensure that we can invest more in revamping all these dilapidated infrastructures.”

“The migration to Band A should have been faster, but we found out that the DisCos refuse to invest. They have refused to invest in this sector.

“A lot of investment is needed for us to achieve an accelerated migration of lower-band customers into Band A. It is taking a lot of time.”

In response, the government is considering restructuring the tariff bands to narrow the current significant gap between them.

A new system, proposed to include Bands A, B, and C, would address these disparities.

“The gap between the Band A tariffs and Bands B, C, D, and E is just too wide,” he remarked. “We believe it’s not fair. It is not just, and we must be able to carry out some level of regularisation.”

He added that the government is committed to reviewing the current tariff structure but quickly clarified that the review does not suggest an imminent rate increase.

BIG STORY

Defections: Three More PDP Governors Will Soon Resign — Fayose

Published

on

Former Governor of Ekiti State, Ayodele Fayose, has claimed that three more governors elected on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) will soon dump the opposition party.

Fayose made the claim on Wednesday while speaking on Politics Today, a Channels Television programme, following the recent resignation of Bayelsa State Governor Douye Diri from the PDP.

According to him, the opposition party may soon be left with only five governors as internal crises continue to plague its ranks.

“Let me tell you, there are three more governors that will leave soon. There will be five remaining. The five remaining, one of them will struggle to catch the ticket, and they all know that the ticket is an ordinary tissue paper,” Fayose said.

He accused some PDP governors of contributing to the party’s decline due to their desire to control its structure.

“They are largely killing the party because they want to control it. This is what happened in 2023,” he added.

Fayose dismissed claims that President Bola Tinubu has been coercing opposition governors to defect to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). He argued that most of the defecting governors are acting out of self-interest and political calculation.

“President Tinubu should not be blamed for PDP’s problems. The PDP is sick and remains perpetually sick without a cure in view,” he stated.

The former governor maintained that the crisis within the PDP is the result of internal sabotage by some of its leaders.

“Those who killed the party know themselves. There is a difference between a former governor and a sitting governor,” Fayose said.

Although still a card-carrying member of the PDP, Fayose said he bears no responsibility for resolving the crisis, insisting that the current leaders must own up to their role in the party’s troubles.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Court Faults Kaduna Police Ban On Political Gatherings, Awards ₦15m To ADC, SDP

Published

on

A Kaduna State High Court has declared unconstitutional the ban on political gatherings imposed by the state commissioner of police, describing it as a violation of citizens’ rights to freedom of assembly and association.

Delivering judgment on Wednesday, Justice Murtala Zubairu ruled that the police acted outside their powers by disrupting an African Democratic Congress (ADC) meeting held on August 30, 2025, which was attended by former Kaduna governor Nasir el-Rufai and other party leaders.

Thugs had invaded the meeting, attacking participants and damaging property, after which the police claimed the event was organised without prior notice to security agencies.

The police subsequently filed a case against the ADC and the Social Democratic Party (SDP), citing “inciting disturbance” and other offences — a move the court described as an abuse of process.

Justice Zubairu faulted the police’s actions, saying they amounted to “selective enforcement and abuse of power.”

> “The applicant’s actions demonstrate a clear pattern of potential abuse of power, warranting perpetual restraint by the Court,” the judge held.

 

He further declared the police’s blanket attempt to prohibit all political assemblies in the state as unconstitutional, awarding a total of ₦15 million in damages to the ADC and SDP.

The compensation covers:

  • The unlawful suspension of the September 4, 2025 meeting,
  • The wrongful portrayal of the parties as violent,
  • The improper ex parte injunction obtained by the police, and
  • The failure to investigate the August 30 violence.

The court also granted a perpetual injunction restraining the commissioner of police, his officers, and agents from interfering with lawful political activities without due process.

Additionally, Justice Zubairu ordered the police to investigate the August 30 attacks and submit a report to the Kaduna attorney-general within 60 days.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Peter Obi Sues Deji Adeyanju, Demands N1.5bn Damages Over ‘Defamation’

Published

on

Peter Obi, the former presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP), has filed a lawsuit against human rights lawyer Deji Adeyanju, accusing him of making defamatory and reckless statements on social media.

The case, lodged at the Anambra State High Court in Onitsha, seeks several declarations and orders against Adeyanju for what Obi described as “false, baseless, unfounded, malicious, reckless, scandalous, and defamatory” remarks.

In the suit, Obi is asking the court to compel Adeyanju to issue an unreserved public apology on all his social media platforms and in three national newspapers.

According to the court documents, the plaintiff wants “an order compelling the Defendant to immediately retract and delete from all his social media platforms, including but not limited to his ‘X’ handle @adeyanjudeji, his verified Facebook account ‘Adeyanju Deji,’ Instagram account @AdeyanjuDeji and any other online platforms or sites, all false and malicious publications describing the Plaintiff with derogatory labels (including ‘leader of a mob,’ ‘religious bigot,’ ‘fraud,’ ‘scum,’ ‘political fraud,’ ‘political prostitute’), allegations of financial misconduct, dishonesty, or abuse of office, which have harmed the Plaintiff’s personal, political, and professional reputation.”

Obi is also seeking an order of perpetual injunction restraining Adeyanju and his associates from further publishing or broadcasting any defamatory content about him.

The Labour Party chieftain further demands aggravated and/or exemplary damages of ₦500 million for what he described as Adeyanju’s “reckless, malicious and persistent” publications, allegedly aimed at ridiculing him before Nigerians and the international community.

In addition, Obi seeks ₦1 billion in general damages as compensation for the emotional distress and reputational harm caused by the alleged defamation.

Continue Reading


 

 


 

 

 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular