The Ogun State Government stated on Monday that it remains firm despite threats of legal action from individuals or groups opposing the Islamic burial rites conducted for Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona, the late paramount ruler of Ijebuland.
Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr Sina Ogungbade (SAN), responded to the legal threat from the International Council for Ifa Religion, which intends to sue the government and the family over the disregard for traditional rites.
Ogungbade said pursuing legal action over the late Awujale’s religious burial would be pointless, although the law permits individuals to challenge government decisions through the judiciary.
Oba Adetona died on Sunday, July 13, 2025, at the age of 91, and was buried on Monday, July 14, 2025, following Islamic practices.
The burial sparked controversy, with the ICIR and traditional leaders criticizing the authorities for allegedly neglecting traditional customs.
During a weekend press briefing in Ibadan, Oyo State, ICIR President, Dr Fayemi Fakayode, and the Council’s lawyer, Ifasola Opeodu, reportedly claimed that the burial violated both cultural practices and existing laws.
Fakayode cited Part 8, Section 55, Sub-section II of the Ogun State Chieftaincy Law, stating that traditional rites are mandated for royal burials in the state.
He disapproved of the exclusion of the Osugbo Confraternity, known as the traditional custodians of final rites, and commended them for not retaliating.
He emphasized that the burial was not just about a single king, but posed a larger threat to Yoruba cultural values, warning that bypassing customs erodes the people’s identity.
The council alleged that members of the late king’s family, along with government authorities and security forces, hindered the Osugbo from fulfilling their traditional responsibilities.
Opeodu described the burial procedure as undemocratic and a violation of the religious liberties of traditional worshippers.
According to the council, neglecting traditional burial protocols undermines the religious rights of those who practice indigenous faiths.
As a result, the ICIR pledged to seek legal remedies and reiterated its dedication to protecting Yoruba traditions in future royal burials.
Clarifying the government’s stance, Ogungbade (SAN) said, “If they want to sue, I will describe it as a welcome development.
He added that individuals or groups who believe the government acted wrongly should use legal channels to express their grievances and hold authorities accountable if justified.
He offered unsolicited legal advice, stating that the group’s position is based on a misunderstanding of the law and would likely result in an unsuccessful lawsuit.
Ogungbade questioned how a decision made by the Awujale and his family to follow religious burial rites could be interpreted as infringing on others’ religious rights.
He described the council’s claim as laughable and hoped they would reconsider or seek proper legal counsel. He concluded that if they go ahead with the case, the government is prepared to defend its position in court.
Chief Rasaki Osimodi, the Olowa Iberu and Chief Priest of Ijebu land, voiced dissatisfaction in an interview, accusing the government of colluding with the late monarch’s family.
He expressed disappointment that despite close ties with traditionalists during his lifetime, the late king chose an Islamic burial and failed to honor traditional obligations.
Osimodi claimed that the government backed the decision by signing an agreement with the Awujale, allowing the Islamic burial to proceed and preventing the Osugbo from taking the body, which he said would have happened otherwise.
He stated that although the late king’s children claimed he had no links with traditionalists, they knew he participated in traditional rites and left some duties unfulfilled.
He explained that the presence of heavily armed security personnel discouraged any opposition from traditionalists, who stepped aside to avoid conflict.
Efforts to get comments from the late Awujale’s family regarding the threatened lawsuit were unsuccessful, but a senior palace official who preferred to remain anonymous described the controversy as insignificant.
The source explained that the family acted within legal boundaries and those upset about the situation should challenge the lawmakers, not the family.
The official concluded that the uproar was unwarranted and equated it to making a fuss over nothing.
Pingback: Drug Dealers Sentenced To Death And Killed Immediately In Front Of School Children | Gubi 01 Limited