Connect with us


BIG STORY

2023: APC Exco, Govs Divided Over Buhari’s Succession Plan, Screening Report Ready

Published

on

There were strong indications on Wednesday that the All Progressives Congress national officials were divided over a plan by the President, Muhammadu, to pick his preferred presidential candidate for the party.

Earlier on Wednesday, the APC National Vice Chairman (North-West), Mallam Salihu Lukman, in an open letter to Buhari, warned that picking a successor would be costly and risky for the President and the party.

However, according to The Punch, two members of the party’s National Working Committee; the Deputy National Secretary, Festus Fuanter, and the National Legal Adviser, Ahmed El-Marzuq, disagreed with Lukman.

Also, feelers from a meeting of the APC governors’ meeting on Tuesday night indicated that the governors could not agree on a consensus and the fact that the President should pick the party’s presidential candidate.

It was also gathered that the committee, which screened the party’s presidential aspirants, would submit its report to the National Chairman, Abdullahi Adamu, on Thursday (today).

Buhari, in an interview with Channels Television in January, said he had a favorite candidate, whom he said he would keep to himself.

On Tuesday, the President, who explained the qualities his successor must possess, sought the backing of the APC governors in picking the party’s presidential candidate.

“I wish to solicit the reciprocity and support of the governors and other stakeholders in picking my successor, who would fly the flag of our party for election into the office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in 2023,” the President urged the governors.

But Lukman, in his letter to Buhari, warned that it would be highly risky to adopt the same succession framework of poor relations between predecessors and successor governors, which was largely a product of poorly imposed political succession arrangement in the country.

He stated, “The temptation for leaders to choose their successors is democratically risky and very costly. If in 2013/2014, Your Excellency could submit yourself to the internal democratic process, it is important that your successor also follows the same process.

“Notwithstanding, however, there is the overriding requirement to appeal to you to kindly resist the temptation. I would have wished we had enough time for open debate within our party. Unfortunately, as things are, we have less than one week to settle this matter.

“Like in the case of December 10, 2014, the APC National Convention, everything will be done at this year’s APC National Convention to guarantee a level-playing field for all aspiring presidential candidates of our party. Any recommendation to the contrary will be inimical and injurious to the electoral fortunes of our great party, APC.”

According to him, a major disadvantage of the succession arrangement with governors choosing their successors is that it negatively affects the relationship between the successor and the predecessor.

Lukman recalled the unfortunate third-term agenda of former President Olusegun Obasanjo and how it eventually eroded all his achievements as a leader, warning that it was necessary to caution against any transition initiative that risked being unpopular.

He stated that any initiative that potentially took away the rights of party members to elect candidates would potentially mobilize Nigerians against the party and rubbish Mr. President.

But the APC Deputy National Secretary, Festus Fuanter, in an interview, said the National Vice Chairman of the party in the North-West spoke for himself when he said that the President should not choose his successor.

Fuanter said, “And I don’t think that an opinion expressed by a member of the NWC should translate to a position of the National Working Committee members. For me, that should not be taken as the position of the APC National Working Committee members because it is not.”

On his part, the party’s National Legal Adviser, Ahmed El-Marzuq, insisted on Wednesday that the President never said he would choose his successor.

His terse SMS on the inquiry on the issue read, “He never decided to pick a successor. Please read his speech very well.”

But part of Buhari’s speech at his meeting with the governors indicated that he wanted to pick his successor as he stated, “I wish to solicit the reciprocity and support of the governors and other stakeholders in picking my successor.”

The National Chairman, South-West, Isaac Kekemeke, when contacted told one of our correspondents that he did not want to be drawn into a controversy over the plan by Buhari to pick his successor.

“I don’t want to comment on the statement authored by Adamu,” he stated.

It was, however, learned the APC National Chairman, at the party’s NWC meeting on Wednesday, apologized over the allegation of not carrying others along in his decision-making.

It was earlier reported that a fresh leadership crisis was brewing in the party over the accusation by Lukman and Kekemeke that Adamu had failed repeatedly to carry members along in decision-making.

When our correspondent reached out to some of the NWC members, Kekemeke confirmed the report, saying they had resolved their differences.

It was also gathered that the governors’ meeting on Tuesday night was inconclusive as they could not agree on whether he should pick his successor.

Efforts to speak to the Osun State Governor, Gboyega Oyetola, through his mobile line and seek his personal view on the issue proved futile, as calls to the line did not go through.

Also, he had yet to respond to a text message sent to him on the issue as of the time of sending this report.

But speaking to one of our correspondents, Special Adviser to the governor on Political Affairs, Sunday Akere, said those who obtained the form should be allowed to participate in the primary.

Akere, who declared that going for consensus might not work, also said those that had been screened should be allowed to express their democratic rights.

“Those who have collected forms and had been screened should be allowed to participate in the primary,” he added.

An aide to Abdullahi Ganduje, the Kano State Governor, who spoke on condition of anonymity in a telephone interview (with The Punch) said that the governor was ready to support Buhari to pick the APC presidential candidate because all the qualities that were outlined by the President were in favor of Tinubu.

He said if Buhari failed to get the support of other APC governors, Ganduje would advise the President to allow all the aspirants to test their popularity at the primary.

An APC presidential aspirant, Emeka Nwajiuba, said that Buhari would not impose any candidate.

He stated, “The President said, ‘Support me to choose my successor,’ not that he said he was going to impose a candidate.”

The Patron, Tinubu Support Organisation in Ekiti State, Dr Adebayo Orire, said it would be catastrophic for the APC to pick the wrong candidate, especially against the backdrop of the strong candidate fielded by the opposition Peoples Democratic Party.

Orire said, “The President has the privilege, not the right to appoint a successor. The delegates have the right to choose the person they feel is right as a candidate. But if the party fields a wrong candidate, it will be very catastrophic for the party and the nation”.

The TSO leader said former Lagos State Governor, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, remained the best candidate that could emerge in the APC “because he is the most popular, most politically grounded, a founding member of the party and he has been helping the party and government till today.”

A group rooting for Vice President Yemi Osinbajo’s presidential bid, Osinbajo Grassroots Organisation, said that the President, having consulted with the governors and planned meetings with stakeholders on the choice of the APC presidential candidate, was not out to impose anybody on the party.

OGO State Leader in Ekiti State, Femi Adeleye, who said that a consensus option was supported by the Electoral Act, said that the Osinbajo group and indeed the South-West subscribed to consensus, saying, “For consensus, if those who are contesting can agree, the law backs it up. Whatever the President does, we abide by it. Whatever the party does, we abide by it.

“In our group, and even in the South-West, we want consensus. Our aspirant has said that we are not averse to choosing somebody. We will support the party. Our aspirant has said it before that in the South-West, we should be able to have a consensus.”

Meanwhile, a former Minister of Science and Technology and aspirant of the APC, Ogbonnaya Onu, on Wednesday said Nigeria must strive to be self-reliant to overcome economic woes, promising to create jobs and end poverty.

Onu who stated this through the Edo State Coordinator of the Onu Campaign Organisation, Salisu Momoh, in Benin while wooing the APC delegates ahead of the party’s presidential primary, said he was ready to put the country on the path of prosperity if given his party’s ticket at the shadow election.

Screening committee submits report today, says we received no petition

The presidential screening committee of the APC will submit its report to the leadership of the party on Thursday (today).

The Chairman of the screening committee, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, stated this during a chat on Wednesday, adding that the committee did not receive any petition against any of the presidential aspirants screened.

Odigie-Oyegun, who is a former national chairman of the APC, said ideally, the committee would have submitted its report earlier but the large number of aspirants who came for the screening made the process more tedious than it ordinarily would have been.

The former governor of Edo State said, “We should submit the report very soon in fact within the next 24 hours or thereabout. You know we screened about 23 or 24 aspirants as opposed to the usual number of three or four aspirants.”

When asked how the panel would investigate the petitions it received against some of the aspirants, Odigie-Oyegun stated, “We didn’t receive any petition. The only petition will be to the party. The party will then treat it as it deems fit.”

The committee asked the aspirants about 10 questions including whether they hold dual citizenship, have corruption cases, have a solid manifesto, and their willingness to accept the consensus method if the primary proposes it. The credentials of the aspirants were also scrutinized.

The screening committee is expected to make a recommendation on each aspirant to the leadership of the APC. This could determine the disqualification or suitability of each aspirant.

A member of the APC in Kano State, Sagir Mai Iyali, had written a petition titled, Disqualification of Bola Ahmed Tinubu from Participating in the Primary Election for APC Presidential Election, which was addressed to the screening committee.

In the letter dated May 17, 2022, the petitioner claimed that Tinubu allegedly submitted false documents to the Independent National Electoral Commission in 1998.

Iyali argued that although Tinubu is above the required age to contest the office of president, his age is not known, adding that obscurity surrounding the presidential hopeful could jeopardize the party’s chances at the polls.

The petitioner said Tinubu had to show proof he attended University of Chicago or he must stand disqualified as the opposition was in possession of his questionable credentials.”

Meanwhile, it was learned that the South-West leaders including a former interim Chairman of the APC, Chief Bisi Akande; former Governor Olusegun Osoba, and ministers and governors from the zone who are members of the party, would be meeting with the five presidential aspirants of the party to pick a consensus candidate.

Apart from Tinubu, others from the South-West who are in the race are Governor Kayode Fayemi of Ekiti State; former Governor Ibikunle Amosun; Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo; fiery cleric, Pastor Tunde Bakare; Deputy Majority Leader of the Senate, Ajayi Boroffice; and a former Speaker of the House of Representatives, Dimeji Bankole.

A chieftain of the APC who wished to remain anonymous because he was not authorized to speak to the media, said, “We are waiting for the result of the screening. Once we have the final list of those who will be contesting, we will convene a meeting in Abuja on the matter.”

Earlier on Tuesday, Ondo State Governor, Rotimi Akeredolu, had said there would be a meeting of the South-West governors on the matter to present a consensus candidate.

It was also gathered that unlike the previous meeting of the South-West leaders which was held in Lagos on May 6 where only unity was discussed, the second meeting would involve the issue of consensus to ensure that the South-West stands behind one aspirant to strengthen the chances of the region producing the presidential candidate of the party.

A former Head of Department, Political Science and Public Administration, Babcock University, Ogun State, Prof. Abiodun Oni, in an interview (with The PUNCH), faulted the President.

He said, ‘‘As a political scientist, I will never say it is democratic. Buhari is making an ambiguous, anti-democratic statement. A statement that can destroy the APC before the convention and that is why he has gone behind to import the consensus arrangement.

Also, a Public Analyst and Communication Specialist, Caleb University, Lagos, Mr. Olawale Adekoya, said, ‘In my opinion, it is pushing the tenets of democracy too far; by the time we begin to see democracy as an act, the better. Individuals must be allowed to express their opinions based on their ideology, philosophies, and schools of thought they belong to.

When contacted by (The Punch) on the telephone on how the APC governors will select a candidate,  the Chairman of the Progressive Governors’ Forum, Atiku Bagudu, asked the media brand to send him a text message and he would respond accordingly. However, he had yet to respond as of 9.45 pm on Wednesday.

BIG STORY

National Assembly Passes Life Imprisonment Bill For Nigerian Drug Traffickers

Published

on

In a bid to tackle drug-related crimes, the National Assembly has amended the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) Act, introducing life imprisonment for drug offenders and traffickers.

This comes after the Senate and House of Representatives adopted the harmonised report on the amendment.

Senator Tahir Monguno, Chairman of the Senate Conference Committee, presented the report, highlighting that the amendment introduces stricter penalties to deter drug-related crimes.

“Any person who unlawfully engages in the storage, custody, movement, carriage or concealment of dangerous drugs or controlled substances and, while doing so, is armed with an offensive weapon or disguised in any manner, commits an offence under this Act and is liable, upon conviction, to life imprisonment,” Monguno said.

The Senate approved the amendment through a voice vote during Thursday’s plenary, which was presided over by Deputy Senate President Barau Jibrin.

In addition, the Senate passed the Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation, and Fiscal Commission Bill, 2024, aimed at replacing the 2004 RMAFC Act. Yahaya Abdullahi, Chairman of the Senate Committee on National Planning and Economic Affairs, stressed the need for the commission’s reform, citing Nigeria’s declining revenue and increasing population.

“The Act, last revised over 20 years ago, no longer reflects Nigeria’s evolving economic realities. This bill proposes additional funding and a restructured operational framework for the commission to improve its efficiency,” Abdullahi explained.

He further emphasised the need for adequate funding from the Federation Account for the RMAFC to effectively carry out its constitutional duties.

The bill, passed after deliberations and a majority vote, now awaits President Bola Tinubu’s assent to become law.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

UPDATE: We’re Ready To Provide Evidence For Trial Of Simon Ekpa — Enugu Government

Published

on

The Enugu State Government has expressed its readiness and willingness to provide evidence to assist in the prosecution of Simon Ekpa, who was arrested in Finland on Thursday over allegations of sponsoring terrorism in Nigeria.

Enugu State Government made this offer in a statement released by the Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Chidiebere Onyia, on Friday.

In the statement, the Enugu State Government also commended the Government of the Republic of Finland for the arrest of Ekpa, whom it described as “the Finland-based leader of the criminal gang, Autopilots.”

The Enugu State Government further referred to Simon Ekpa as “a common criminal, con man, and terrorist, who has no interest of Igbo people at heart.”

It added that Ekpa “is a murderer and fraudster, who delights in killing his people and living large off their misery.”

“Enugu State was ready and willing to provide evidence of Ekpa-sponsored atrocities against Ndigbo to aid his trial and conviction, whether in Finland or Nigeria.”

“The Enugu State Government welcomes the arrest of the Finland-based terrorist, Simon Ekpa.”

“His arrest and trial will no doubt go a long way in strengthening peace, security, and stability in all parts of the South East.”

“This arrest is in line with the demand of Governor Peter Mbah Administration, which has repeatedly made it known that Ekpa is a megalomaniac, common criminal, murderer, and fraudster, who takes joy in feeding fat on the manipulated emotions of Ndigbo and inflicting misery on the South East region.”

“Ekpa has for long, and unfortunately from Finland, made a living by creating a siege climate and mentality in the South East, destroying lives, property, and the Igbo trademark of entrepreneurship and hard work.”

“He thrives on manipulating, exploiting, and extorting the people on the pretext of fighting for their interest and for the restoration of Biafra,” the government said.

Ekpa was arrested and detained alongside four other suspects by the government of Finland on charges of sponsoring terrorism in Nigeria, according to local newspapers in the European country.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Much Ado About Meddlesome Minions, And Messengers Of Misinformation — By Tayo Williams

Published

on

There is a growing phalanx of pseudo-intellectuals parading the social media space with faux and fictitious knowledge of the indigenous oil and gas industry, and it is scary because of the grave danger they portend and present for the average Nigerian.

From X (formerly known as Twitter) to Facebook and even the photos and videos-sharing site, Instagram, they abound, in their inglorious number, lending their platforms to deliberately distort facts and spread misinformation especially to favour the narratives propounded by popular Nigerian businessman Aliko Dangote, owner of the Dangote Petroleum Refinery.

Since the refinery began operations earlier in the year, it has been one week, one controversy allegedly orchestrated by Dangote in a brazen attempt to arm-twist the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Limited, NNPCL, into playing by his rules.

Those conversant with the modus operandi of Dangote and his refinery say the long-drawn warfare with every institution and individual in the oil and gas value chain is nothing but a self-seeking and mindless profit maximisation tactic.

Whilst nobody begrudges Dangote’s drive for profit as a businessman, perhaps he needs to be reminded that the NNPC has a mandate to ensure and provide energy security in a way that is affordable and sustainable for the generality of Nigerians. And, the NNPCL management has declared in very unambiguous terms that it would not pander to the din of the market whether orchestrated by Dangote, his rampaging minions or anyone else.

The truth, however, is that there is an increasing army of vacuous, vicious, and vile individuals strutting the social media space defending and propagating outright and outlandish falsehoods. Of particular concern is one Kelvin Emmanuel who has become the unofficial mouthpiece of the Dangote Refinery. Going from one media house to the other, he pulls figures out of the air and projects obnoxious untruths on hapless Nigerians. With the backing of his paymaster’s billions, it is no surprise that this otherwise irrelevant and fatuous character now commands appearances on major television stations.

But it is on X that he has made lying glibly and gratuitously the Holy Grail. He once premised Dangote’s inability to secure feedstock for his refinery on the government and the NNPCL. While peddling this untruth, he conveniently forgets that the refinery had a seven-year window, during its construction phase, to lock in feedstock supplies that could last a minimum of five years. Dangote did none of that. As it would later unfold, his game plan, which Emmanuel glossed over, was to monopolise equity oil and production quotas to serve his business interests.

Another deliberate misinformation from the Dangote camp was the allegation that International Oil Companies (IOCs) and other industry players were trying to sabotage his interests. Apart from being an investor in the Dangote Refinery, the NNPC still supplies gas to various Dangote companies across Nigeria. How can anyone or any institution jeopardise their investment? What further proof of faith does Dangote and his minions need to know that the NNPC is their cheerleader, and is here to make operating in the industry seamless and a win-win for all?

Echoing Dangote’s baseless stance, Emmanuel also called for the sack of Mr. Farouk Ahmed, Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), regulators of Nigeria’s midstream and downstream value chain. By Emmanuel’s warped reckoning, Ahmed had no locus to speak against Dangote or his enterprise because the latter questioned the quality of the product from Dangote Refinery and other local refineries in comparison with imported ones. Of course, Emmanuel’s was a lone voice in the wilderness because those who understand the invaluable role that the NMDPRA plays in the industry did not as much as dignify his tirade with a glance.

In a robust response to Emmanuel’s groundswell of egregious lies, Ibrahim Y. Kabo, a petroleum engineer based in Abuja, described him as “Someone who has not seen the inside of a refinery before Dangote built one, let alone understood the mechanism of the energy industry, …(yet) assuming the role of an authority in oil and gas matters.”

He went further to lampoon Emmanuel for stating that only Dangote Refinery’s products meet specifications while others are all sub-standard. “The obvious question is: whose specifications? For a refinery that has barely made four of seven pre-inauguration certifications, it sounds somehow laughable to suddenly assume the role of regulator in an industry you’ve barely entered,” Kabo said.

In the article, entitled, “The Hand of Aliko, the Voice of Kelvin: Inside Dangote Refinery’s Media Stunt Lab”, Kabo declared that from all Emmanuel’s interviews and pretensions to be an industry expert, one thing is obvious: “He lacks an understanding of both the mandate and the reach of NNPC as a national oil company.”

Kabo adds that, “Downstream is the least of NNPC’s business interests. The mandate, as per PIA (Petroleum Industry Act), is to facilitate both the extraction and commercialization of Nigeria’s oil and gas resources. 20 billion dollars may be a lot, but NNPC and industry regulators routinely handle projects of that magnitude. At best, Dangote and (Emmanuel’s) ranting are an irritation. I believe that’s why NNPC openly declared it was not interested in being Dangote’s off-taker.”

Like the Yoruba saying goes, derision does not stop the sweetness of the honey. The meddlesome minions and messengers of misinformation can continue dancing naked in the marketplace, but what is most important is that the NNPCL has assured that it will not cease doing everything in its capacity “to harness the possibilities of oil and gas, address energy demand and drive the national economy, and become the number one oil producer and supplier in Africa.”

 

Tayo Williams is a Lagos-based media executive

Continue Reading



 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular