Connect with us


BIG STORY

Yahaya Bello: Court Fixes Dates For Response To Summons In Alleged Fraud Suit

Published

on

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has requested an adjournment in its new charge against the former Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, and two others, until November 14, 2024.

At the resumed hearing, Counsel to the Commission, Rotimi Oyedepo, stated that the court had issued a public summons against Bello, instructing that it be published and that the charge be pasted.

The trial Judge, Justice Maryann Anenih, clarified, saying she had not asked for the charge to be pasted, only the summons.

Oyedepo mentioned he anticipated Bello to be in court on November 14, citing the 30-day duration of the summons, and therefore sought an adjournment until that date for the arraignment of all three defendants.

Joseph Daudu, senior advocate of Nigeria and counsel for the 2nd defendant, opposed this, arguing that the matter was set for arraignment and that they were ready. He emphasized that the defendants were independent individuals and should be treated as such.

“You cannot be using somebody as a human shield when they are not in hostage. I don’t like this practice,” he said.

Counsel for the 3rd defendant concurred with Daudu, and alternatively requested that the court consider his client’s application for bail.

Oyedepo, however, maintained that the bail application could not proceed as the charge was a joint charge, with counts of conspiracy included.

He reiterated his call for an adjournment to November 14 and informed the court of an application concerning the enforcement of the 2nd defendant’s fundamental rights, adding that the oral application could not be entertained.

Daudu insisted that this approach violated the principles of fair hearing.

“His argument is persuasive but does not go by what the law says. That until one individual appears before they can be arraigned. I don’t understand this kind of practice.

“It is an affront to fair hearing because the privilege of fair hearing allows us to raise any issue. Keeping them for 10 years will have no impact.

“They have enjoyed administrative bail before with the EFCC, so it won’t hurt their pride if they give them,” he stated.

The 2nd defendant’s counsel also sought a date for the hearing of a fundamental rights application on behalf of his client.

Although the trial judge declined the oral application for bail, she instructed the defendants to submit formal written applications.

Justice MaryAnne Anenih then adjourned the case to the 14th and 20th of November for the 1st defendant’s response to the summons and/or arraignment.

BIG STORY

Father Of Man Who Killed Mother, Six Children Wants Him Killed Without Trial

Published

on

Malam Auwal, the father of Umar Auwal, who was accused of killing a mother and her six children, has said he should be killed without trial.

He said his son had earlier killed his sister and plucked out her eyes, apart from the other two housewives he also murdered.

Auwal, who spoke in an interview on a radio station, said: “What he committed against my younger sister and her six children, my wife’s younger sister, and her co-wife is condemnable.

“I distance myself from him.

“I don’t even want them to waste time on prosecution.

“Umar and his likes are supposed to be eliminated.

“They are not supposed to be remanded and fed with taxpayers’ money.”

Auwal, who commended the police for their handling of the case, said neither he nor his wife would attend court proceedings during the trial.

Umar was accused of murdering his aunt, Fatima Abubakar, 35, and her six children in their residence at Dorayi Gidan Kwari, Kano, Kano State.

The names and ages of the children were given as Maimuna (17), Aisha (16), Bashir (13), Abubakar (10), Faruk (7), and Abdussalam (one-and-a-half years old).

The Kano State Police Command said the suspect had confessed to the killings as well as those of two housewives in the Tudun Yola area of the state.

 

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Pressure Mounts on Omooba Abimbola Onabanjo To Step Down But He Refuses As Political Plot To Capture Awujale Stool Falters

Published

on

A determined bid to force Omooba Abimbola Onabanjo out of the ongoing Awujale succession process has stalled in Ogun State, as the prince has refused all pressure to step down despite tactics that insiders describe as intimidation, institutional threats, and cultural blackmail.

Palace and civic sources disclosed that the pressure campaign began after kingmakers from the Fusengbuwa ruling house refused to nominate an aspirant believed to be the preferred choice of powerful political figures in the state. The refusal reportedly disrupted the political plans and triggered a coordinated attempt to push Onabanjo out of the race.

Selection Process Suspended after Kingmakers Reject Unworthy Candidate

The selection process was later suspended, a move insiders say was connected to the failed attempt to impose the preferred aspirant. According to those familiar with the matter, the kingmakers insisted that they would not nominate strangers, unworthy persons, or candidates who do not possess the cultural legitimacy required for the ancient throne.

Kingmakers Face Threats Over Ijebu Development Projects

In a dramatic twist, palace sources alleged that the kingmakers were told that if they failed to nominate the candidate preferred by the political class, there would be no Ijebu State and the long-awaited Ijebu Dry Port project would be suspended. Both projects have been major aspirations of the Ijebu people for decades.

A palace source described the development as shocking and disgraceful, noting that weaponizing development against a cultural institution is an insult to the community.

Attempt to Use Institutions Backfires

After failing to bend the kingmakers, attention shifted toward eliminating Onabanjo from the contest. Petitions were reportedly taken to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Department of State Services in an attempt to intimidate him. However, sources claimed that both institutions indicated that they found nothing against him and would not be used as instruments in the succession struggle.
With that avenue blocked, analysts say conversations began about formulating fresh accusations and smear attacks to weaken the prince’s public standing before the process resumes.

Public Outrage as Communities Push Back

The revelations have generated outrage across Ijebu land, with civic voices demanding that politicians withdraw from the succession process before further damage is done.

“This is oppression disguised as politics,” said Kazeem Shobande, a civic advocate in Ijebu Ode. “Threatening to suspend Ijebu State or the dry port project simply because you want to install your own candidate is an insult to the entire community.”

“This is favouritism mixed with entitlement,” added Mrs Funmilola Adekunle of Ijebu Imushin. “Tradition cannot be rigged. The kingmakers have said they will not nominate unworthy candidates. Politicians must not trivialize their own legacies or ridicule the throne.”

Retired civil servant and cultural historian Oladipo Onifade warned that the interference risks reducing the Awujale stool to a tool for political bargaining. According to him, even colonial administrators avoided meddling in the Awujale succession, and modern leaders should avoid disgracing themselves.

Onabanjo Stands His Ground

Despite private emissaries and attempts at negotiation, sources close to Onabanjo confirmed that he has refused to step down. The prince reportedly told associates that the throne belongs to Ijebu sons and that the succession must follow tradition, not political preferences.

A Struggle Between Tradition and Power

Observers warn that continued interference risks triggering a legitimacy crisis and setting a dangerous precedent in Yoruba land. With the selection process still suspended, civic groups are calling for its immediate resumption, free from political influence.

For now, political actors have failed to push Onabanjo out and have attracted condemnation for attempting to manipulate one of the most ancient royal institutions in the region.

Whether they escalate further or withdraw from the arena remains to be seen.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Malami Accuses DSS of Denying Him Access To Family, Legal Team

Published

on

Abubakar Malami, former Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, has accused the Department of State Services of denying him access to his family members and legal team.

Malami, who is standing trial alongside his son and wife over allegations bordering on money laundering, was arraigned by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and subsequently remanded at the Kuje Correctional Centre in Abuja.

On January 7, a federal high court in Abuja granted him bail in the sum of N500 million.

However, shortly after his release from the facility on Monday, DSS operatives arrested Malami at the front of Kuje prison.

The former minister was reportedly re-arrested following the alleged discovery of arms at his residence.

In a statement on Wednesday, Mohammed Doka, the media aide to the former AGF, said the reports that DSS found arms at Malami’s residence are “false, unsubstantiated and unsupported by any official record”.

Doka said no such discovery has been formally communicated to Malami’s family or legal representatives.

He said the “prolonged isolation” of Malami by the DSS raises legitimate concerns regarding his safety, welfare, and constitutionally guaranteed rights. ”

“We categorically reject claims that any cache of arms or ammunition was discovered in any residence linked to Abubakar Malami, SAN,” the statement reads.

“These claims are false, unsubstantiated, and unsupported by any official record, judicial document, or lawful disclosure. No such discovery has been formally communicated to his family or legal representatives.

“We also firmly deny allegations or insinuations linking Abubakar Malami, SAN, to terrorism, terrorism financing, or related activities.

“Such claims have been advanced without naming a single individual, organisation, transaction, date, or piece of verifiable evidence, rendering them speculative and irresponsible.

“Since his arrest on Monday by the DSS, Abubakar Malami, SAN, has been denied access to his family, legal team, and associates.

“This prolonged isolation raises legitimate concerns regarding his safety, welfare, and constitutionally guaranteed rights, including access to legal counsel and family contact.

“We further express concern over the undue hardship and emotional strain placed on his family and staff as a result of sensational reporting and unverified narratives.

“It is important to note that Abubakar Malami, SAN, is a prominent chieftain of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and has publicly declared his intention to contest the Kebbi State governorship election in 2027.

“Against this background, the political undertones now surrounding this matter cannot be ignored. Legal processes must remain insulated from political considerations.”

Continue Reading


 

 


 

 

 

 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular


Warning: Undefined array key "slug" in /home/porsch10/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php on line 2117

Warning: Undefined array key "slug" in /home/porsch10/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php on line 2117

Warning: Undefined array key "slug" in /home/porsch10/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php on line 2117