Connect with us


BIG STORY

We Won’t Reverse Nigeria’s Travel Ban Over FG’s Threat —– UK

Published

on

The British High Commission on Sunday said the United Kingdom would not reverse its travel ban on Nigeria because of a threat of retaliation by the Federal Government.

The spokesman for the British High Commission, Dean Hurlock, said this in response to an inquiry by The PUNCH on Sunday over a statement by the Minister of Aviation, Hadi Sirika, that the UK, Canada, and Saudi Arabia would be put on Nigeria’s travel ban on Tuesday.

Hurlock stated that Britain had made it clear that travel abroad would be different this year, adding that the UK was sticking to its “standard background lines.”

In a text message to the high commission, one of our correspondents stated that the Federal Government had said it would place a travel ban on the UK as a retaliatory move.

The correspondent then asked, “Will that make the UK to rescind its travel ban?”

In his response, Hurlock stated, “The UK Government propose sticking to our standard background lines on whether ‘x’ country will put us on the red list and avoid getting into hypothetical situations.

“The UK government has been clear that travel abroad will be different this year and countries may impose border measures at short notice in line with their own coronavirus policies.”

He added that the Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office travel advice was kept under constant review and asked travellers to continue to check it for entry requirements of the destination they plan to visit.

“Travellers can also sign up for e-mail alerts on GOV.UK to get the latest updates as soon as they happen. We are in regular conversations with other countries about their travel policies,” Hurlock explained.

In an earlier response to a media inquiry, he said, “The position stated in our press release of last weekend still stands at present.”

In the press release, the UK had said Nigeria would be added to the travel red list from 4 am on December 6 following 21 cases of Omicron variant of COVID-19 reported in England, which had travel history from Nigeria.

“These are temporary measures that have been introduced to prevent further omicron cases from entering the UK and will be examined at the three-week review point on 20 December.”

The British High Commissioner to Nigeria, Catriona Laing, had said Omicron cases in the UK had clear links to overseas travel from Nigeria and South Africa.

Also On Thursday, Laing, in an interview with Channels Television, insisted that the travel ban was evidence-based.

According to her 19 out of 21 passengers with Omicron variant with Nigeria’s travel history flew directly to Britain from Nigeria.

But the Minister of Aviation, Sirika, in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria in Lagos on Sunday, said the Federal Government would place a travel ban on the UK, Canada, Argentina, and Saudi Arabia as a retaliation for the travel restriction on Nigeria.

He disclosed the Federal Government would restrict airlines coming from Canada, the UK, and Saudi Arabia into Nigeria.

According to him, the decision is to reciprocate restricted flights from Nigeria into those countries over the new COVID-19 variant, Omicron.

Sirika said the regime of the President, Major General Muhammadu Buhari, (retd.) would also place the UK, Canada, and Saudi Arabia on a red list over the outbreak and spread of the Omicron variant.

The minister noted that if those countries placed Nigeria on a red list, they lacked a moral right to have their airlines fly into Nigeria on commercial operations.

“There is also the case of Saudi Arabia that put Nigeria on the ban list. On Sunday, I participated in a meeting with the COVID-19 task force.

“We have given our input that it is not acceptable by us and we recommended that those Canada, the UK, Saudi Arabia, and Argentina also be put on the red list.

“As they did to us if they do not allow our citizens into their countries; who are they coming, as airlines, to pick from our country?

“They are not supposed to come in. I am very sure in the next three days; Monday or Tuesday, all those countries will be put on the red list of COVID-19,’’ the minister said.

He stressed that airlines of the affected countries remained banned and the countries placed on Nigeria’s red list.

 

PUNCH

BIG STORY

Bill To Make Appeal Court Final Arbiter For Governorship Election Petitions Passes Second Reading

Published

on

A bill proposing that the Court of Appeal serve as the final authority for governorship election petitions has passed second reading in the House of Representatives.

The bill, sponsored by Nnamdi Ezechi, who represents Ndokwa East/Ndokwa West/Ukwuani federal constituency of Delta State, seeks to amend Section 246 of the 1999 Constitution.

Currently, Section 246 stipulates that the Court of Appeal’s rulings on National Assembly and State Houses of Assembly election petitions are final.

The proposed amendment aims to extend this finality to governorship election disputes, preventing such cases from reaching the Supreme Court.

Objective of the Bill

When the bill passed first reading in 2024, Ezechi explained that the legislation aims to reduce delays and cut costs in post-election litigations.

If enacted, the law will eliminate the Supreme Court’s role in resolving governorship election petitions—a significant departure from the current judicial process.

Recent Supreme Court Reversals

There have been instances where the Court of Appeal nullified governorship elections, only for the Supreme Court to overturn those rulings.

Plateau State (2023): The tribunal and Court of Appeal nullified the election of Caleb Mutfwang of the PDP. However, in January 2024, the Supreme Court overturned this decision and affirmed his election.

Kano State (2023): The tribunal and Court of Appeal removed Abba Yusuf as Governor. The Supreme Court later reinstated him.

The proposed amendment would prevent such reversals by making the Court of Appeal’s decision final in governorship election disputes.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Samsung Electronics Co-CEO Han Jong-Hee Dies From ‘Cardiac Arrest’

Published

on

Han Jong-Hee, co-chief executive officer (CEO) of Samsung Electronics, has died at the age of 63 due to cardiac arrest.

According to CNN, the company confirmed his passing on Tuesday.

The report states that “Jong-Hee” had been leading Samsung’s consumer electronics and mobile devices businesses since 2022 and was appointed as vice chairman and CEO that same year.

A company spokesperson stated that “Jun Young-Hyun”, his co-CEO, who was appointed last week, will now assume the role of Samsung’s sole CEO.

Samsung Pays Tribute

In an internal message obtained by CNN, Samsung honored “Jong-Hee”, recognizing his 37 years of service and his leadership in establishing Samsung’s TV business as a global leader.

The company also credited him with contributing to growth in its electronics and appliances businesses despite a challenging business landscape.

“Our deepest condolences are with his family and loved ones during this difficult time,” the message stated.

A Career in Innovation

“Jong-Hee” joined Samsung in 1988 after earning a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Inha University.

Before leading Samsung’s electronics and devices division, he was responsible for its display operations.

A company biography published last week described him as a key figure in the development of Samsung’s LED TVs, emphasizing his role in maintaining the company’s technology leadership.

Challenges for Samsung

The report highlighted that Samsung has faced significant challenges in recent years, particularly in its logic semiconductor business, which has struggled to compete with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) in advanced chip production and client acquisition.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Judge Recuses Self From “Natasha Akpoti’s” Case Over Bias Allegation

Published

on

Obiora Egwuatu, a judge at the Federal High Court in Abuja, has withdrawn from the case filed by “Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan”, senator representing Kogi Central

Egwuatu, on Tuesday, stated that his decision was based on an allegation of bias against him by “Senate President Godswill Akpabio”.

The suit was initiated by “Akpoti-Uduaghan” to prevent the Senate Committee on Ethics and Public Petitions from carrying out disciplinary proceedings against her.

On March 4, the judge had issued an order restraining the Senate from initiating disciplinary actions against “Akpoti-Uduaghan”, following an ex parte application submitted by her legal representatives.

Case to Be Reassigned

After hearing from the legal teams of the involved parties, “Egwuatu” announced his withdrawal from the case.

He directed that the case file be forwarded to “John Tsoho, the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court”, for reassignment.

The defendants in the case include:

  • The Clerk of the National Assembly
  • The Senate
  • The Senate President
  • The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Ethics

Previously, the judge ruled that the defendants had 72 hours to show cause why an interlocutory injunction should not be granted against them.

However, 48 hours later, the Senate suspended “Akpoti-Uduaghan” for six months after adopting the committee’s report.

Additionally, the Senate ordered that:

  • Her office be locked
  • She must return all Senate properties in her possession to “The Clerk of the National Assembly” for the duration of her suspension.

On March 19, “Egwuatu” overturned his March 4 order, which had earlier prevented the Senate from suspending “Akpoti-Uduaghan”.

Continue Reading



 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular