Connect with us

BIG STORY

Warning To Celestial Church Members: Does Your Dancing Glorify God? —- Kayode Alfred

Published

on

The subject of dancing is one that elicits varied opinions all around the world. While a school of thought believes it comes with therapeutic benefits; and another believes it is spiritual and biblical; there are various extremist Christian groups that believe dancing is inherently sinful and should be proscribed in general or during religious services. For the purpose of this intervention, the seductive instrument that dancing is fast becoming or has become in Celestial Church of Christ vis-à-vis its spiritual significance is the central focus of this piece.

It is not clear when dancing became an activity for humans. But from the early records of civilization dancing, at one point or the other, dancing was an act used for mate selection, the invocation of fetish spirits, initiation to secret societies, and worship of pagan gods – it was either ceremonial or ritualistic. And as civilization progressed it morphed into an activity for social functions, a form of mere entertainment, displayed especially in night clubs. We all know clubhouses to be a center for extreme profanities, a space that does not agree with our Christian beliefs. However, in recent times, some of these dance steps displayed in clubs have been surfacing during worship, in our churches. And the question now is: why are we bringing the unholy to the house of holiness?

The word dance or dancing, in all its forms, appears multiple times in the Bible. And they are two interpretations to it. The first could be translated to mean jumping up and down in (un)controlled excitement depicting joy. The second could be translated to mean indecent bodily movement, which was always condemned in passages where it appeared. Primarily, dancing, especially for women, is to some degree, seductive expression of body movements. It was why the women of old used it to seduce fetish spirits they sought favour from, or, as was the case in mate selection, to seduce and attract a potential partner. Therefore, the act of dancing can induce lust and lead to fornication or other sinful acts.

A biblical account lucidly explains how dancing led to an atrocious act by the great King of Galilee, Herod, and Herodias’s daughter. In Mark 6:21-22, Apostle Mark wrote, “Then an opportune day came when Herod on his birthday gave a feast for his nobles, the high officers, and the chief men of Galilee. And when Herodias’ daughter herself came in and danced, and pleased Herod and those who sat with him, the king said to the girl, ‘Ask me whatever you want, and I will give it to you.’”

Salome, encouraged by her mother Herodias, asked for the head of John the Baptist. And King Herod, under the seductive spell incited by Salome’s dance moves, consented. He slew the man of God and served John the Baptist’s head to Salome. This is an example of how extreme the power of sensual dancing can be, and the damage it can bring. Under the influence of its seduction we can go to extremes and commit acts we should not involve with, as Christians. It is why we shouldn’t bring this ungodly movement of body parts into our places of worship.

In early July 2019, a video of a young member of the Celestial Church of Christ went viral on the internet. In this video, the young man was doing a dance redolent of masturbation, a dance that was popularised by a Nigerian musician Naira Marley. This dance we all know as Soapy. And this young man, with his palm folded into a fist in front of his crotch, moved to our Christian praises with his immoral dance step, rocking the folded fist back and forth to mimic stroking. At that time, the video sparked a lot of controversies, of how young Christians are letting pop culture slide into our religion, of how these young Christians, with their sensual dances, are desecrating God’s holy ground, of how they are painting the church in a bad light. This young man could feign ignorance and say he didn’t know the implications of his actions. And that is why it’s important we have this conversation. The question I’ll ask is this: When you move your body in a way suggestive of sexual activity, what image would you be putting in the minds of people around you? If you answered honestly, you’ll agree that you have, at that moment, planted unclean thoughts in their heads. In short, you have led them to sin. For fear of sounding judgemental, can you beat your chest, come clean and say you are not as guilty as those whom you have led astray in their innermost thoughts even if they did not physically manifest the lechery in their head?

Also, about a month before the Soapy dancer’s video, another video of a Celestial member had gone viral too. And in this one, a young woman was dancing in front of seated elders of the church. She twisted her waist and moved her backside to the rhythm of the drumbeat in the background. It’s a dance popular among ungodly women known as ‘twerking’ – a dance that has no place in the church of God. This video made outsiders say all sort of things against our church. Many who do not understand our values began to condemn us because of the act of this young lady, saying our church has become a clubhouse. Is this the image we want to project?

Anyway, these are the ones that went viral because they crept into the internet, but how about the ones that didn’t? Dancing is an activity of the body, requiring the movement of the shoulders, waists, and feet, a movement that can become sexually suggestive depending on how you move. In our churches, it’s been noticed that most of our ladies, while dancing, end up shaking their behinds in worship, even their breasts too, which can prove provocative for the men around them. Sandra Humphrey, author of What Do You Communicate, said, “No healthy man will deny that it is sexually arousing to watch a girl swing her hips and breasts suggestively to music.” It’s a biological reaction and the best way to surmount any lustful temptations is to flee. We can’t pretend the sway of hips and twist of waist women do in church is not sexually suggestive or not dropping lascivious ideas in people’s minds. For example, if you were one of those elders seated before the twerking lady, what thoughts do you think would creep into your mind? Even if by the grace of God, you avert the temptation and chose to not act on it, it doesn’t negate the fact that a lewd thought was established.

In Matthew 5:28 Jesus said, “But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” And if your sensual dancing was responsible for men lusting after you in church, won’t you be guilt-ridden at the fall of those men? Many may say they only danced to glorify God and not to tempt the opposite sex. But the question I’ll ask is when this suggestive movement of the body is corrupting the hearts of the opposite sex in church, does the dance glorify God?

In his letter to the Philippians, Paul wrote, “Finally, brethren, whatever things are true, whatever things are noble, whatever things are just, whatever things are pure, whatever things are lovely, whatever things are of good report, if there is any virtue and if there is anything praiseworthy–meditate on these things.” (Philippians 4:8)

Take note of “whatever things are pure”. Now, if your dancing was pure would it plant impure thoughts in others? Remember that anything that is of the Lord is pure. And if the endpoint of dancing leads to impurity, then it is safe to say that dancing is not of the Lord. And we should desist from it.

As committed members of the Celestial Church of Christ, we should always look back to our foundation to be sure we are not breaking away from our roots. The first primary mission set by our founder, Reverend Samuel Bilewu Joseph Oshoffa, is: “To worship God Almighty in holiness and reverence.” Dancing provocatively in the church is in opposition to this mission. It may feel innocent to indulge. And one could say they are only dancing to the glory of God, in praise and adoration, as King David in the bible danced with reckless abandon. But remember that David was a bad dancer, so his dancing was putting his image, if caught by another eye, at the risk of embarrassment. He had something to lose. And his poor dancing skill, instead of pulling or drawing the eyes seductively, instigated mockery.

Michal, daughter of Saul, even condemned David for his dancing: “But as the Ark of the Lord entered the City of David, Michal, the daughter of Saul, looked down from her window. When she saw King David leaping and dancing before the Lord, she was filled with contempt for him. … When David returned home to bless his own family, Michal, the daughter of Saul, came out to meet him. She said in disgust, ‘How distinguished the king of Israel looked today, shamelessly exposing himself to the servant girls like any vulgar person might do!’” (2 Samuel 6:16, 20)

But David retorted, saying he was willing to look more foolish than he did, even to the point of humiliation, in celebration for what God has done for him. The things to pick out of this are:

David danced out of excitement and he lost control.

David knew he was a bad dancer, so him dancing before those people was a thing of embarrassment for his image, which could make some people lose respect for him.

And we all know how important people’s respect is for a king. And David also knew but was putting his self-respect at stake. So, when you chose to reference David as an example when you’re dancing recklessly, ask yourself: What do you have to lose? What is the personal/important thing you are putting at stake?

Some of us do it because we feel it is the way of the world now, and we’re evolving alongside. But remember what John wrote, “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth forever.” (1 John 2:15-17)

The lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes: We can tell where these two forms of lust can happen at once: dancing. And as children of God, we shouldn’t corrupt our morality with the ways of the world. We shouldn’t let the want of the flesh to lead us to sin. The Bible was always particular about the dangers of sexual immorality and promiscuity. Whether we chose to admit it or not, dancing is sexual. It is an erotic stimulant. Dancing breeds lust. And with lust leading sexual advances will follow. And if the spirit is weak, church members can fall into the sin of fornication or adultery. In the book of Galatians 5:19-21, Paul wrote, “Now the deeds of the flesh are evident, which are: immorality, impurity, sensuality, … and things like these, of which I forewarn you, just as I have forewarned you, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.” The word we’ll pick out here is sensuality, also referred to as lasciviousness in other translations. Its root meaning is: moving the body in a way that arouses sexual desire. And if we should compress that definition into a modern-day word, wouldn’t that be dance? You can see that the dancing, in itself, can deprive one of inheriting God’s kingdom.

There are many ways through which we can glorify God without having to put up seductive dancing shows that make our Christian virtues questioned; many honourable ways through which we can express our joy and gratitude for Him. Yes, God has turned our mourning into dancing but the dance does not have to project those trending carnal dances. God sees our hearts. He knows if we are deeply thankful. He knows if we are truly worshipping. Shaking your body in a way that could lead others to sin is not necessary at all. Singing praises to His name is worship enough. Giving offerings and tithe is enough to show gratitude. We should abstain from this act that may lead us to eternal damnation and focus on worshipping God the right way, the way our founding father followed.

BIG STORY

JUST IN: EFCC To Arraign Former CBN Governor Emefiele On Fresh Charge, Says He Printed N684.5m Notes With N18.9bn

Published

on

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has filed a new indictment at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory against the embattled former governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Godwin Emefiele.

Emefiele was charged by the EFCC with authorising the printing of N684,590,000, or N18.96 billion.

The EFCC claimed in the charge sheets released on Tuesday that Emefiele violated the law while carrying out the former President Muhammadu Buhari’s naira swap programme with the intention of hurting the general public.

The anti-graft agency also accused Emefiele of unlawfully approving the withdrawal of N124.8 billion from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Federation.

The document dated April 2, 2024, and marked Suit No: CR/264/2024, was filed by EFCC’s top prosecutor, Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN revealed that Emefiele will be arraigned on a new four-count charge before Justice Hamza Muazu bordering on disobeying the law to punish Nigerians, iilegal printing of money, abuse of office, among others.

Counts one to four of the charge, read, “STATEMENT OF OFFENCE: Public Servant disobeying direction of law with intent to cause injury to the public contrary to and punishable under Section 123 of the Penal Code Law, Cap. 89 Laws of the Federation, 1990.

“PARTICULARS OF THE OFFENCE: That you GODWIN IFEANYI EMEFIELE between the 19th day of October 2022 and 5th March 2023 in Abuja, knowingly disobeyed the direction of Section 19 of the CBN Act, 2007, by approving the printing of N375,520,000.00 pieces of colour swapped N1, 000, at the total cost of N11,052, 068,062 without the recommendation of the Board of Central Bank and the strict approval of the President, Federal Republic of Nigeria which conduct of yours caused injury to the public and you thereby committed an offence.”

“COUNT 2: “That you, GODWIN IFEANYI EMEFIELE, between the 19th of October 2022 and 5th March 2023 in Abuja, knowingly disobeyed the direction of Section 19 of the Central Bank of Nigeria Act, 2007, by approving the printing of 172,000,000 pieces of colour swapped N500 (Five Hundred Naira) Notes, at the total cost of N4, 471,066,040 without the recommendation of the Board of Central Bank and the strict approval of the President, Federal Republic of Nigeria which conduct of yours caused injury to the public and you thereby committed an offence.

“COUNT 3: “That you GODWIN IFEANYI EMEFIELE between the 19th day of October 2022 and 5th March 2023 in Abuja, knowingly disobeyed the direction of Section 19 of the CBN Act, 2007, by approving the printing of 137,070,000 pieces of colour swapped N200 (Two Hundred Naira) Note, at the total cost of N3, 441, 005, 280 without the recommendation of the Board of Central Bank and the strict approval of the President, Federal Republic of Nigeria which conduct of yours caused injury to the public and you thereby committed an offence.”

“COUNT 4: “That you, GODWIN IFEANYI EMEFIELE, on or about the 7th day of October 2020, in Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, knowingly disobeyed the direction of Section 80 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amended), by approving the withdrawal of the total sum of N124, 860, 227, 865.16 from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Federation in a manner not prescribed by the National Assembly, which conduct of yours caused injury to the public and you thereby committed an offence.”

Recall that Emefiele was on November 18, 2023, arraigned before the court on six counts of procurement fraud, in what is the most high-profile corruption case under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

He was also accused of abusing his office by approving a contract for the acquisition of 43 vehicles totalling N1.2 billion from 2018 to 2020.

On Monday, April 8, 2024, the EFCC arraigned the former banker alongside one Henry Omoile before Justice R.A. Oshodi of the Special Offences Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos for an alleged $4.5bn and N2.8bn fraud.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

UNN Suspends, Probes Lecturer For ‘Attempting To Sexually Assault’ Student

Published

on

A lecturer known as Mfonobong Udoudom has been suspended by the University of Nigeria (UNN) for what it called an “inappropriate affair” with a student.

Viral videos surfaced on Tuesday showing the senior lecturer of general studies pacing around his office in his pants, looking visibly alarmed.

Sources at the university said that the lecturer was “caught pants down attempting to have sex with a married female student of the school.”

According to the sources, Udoudom had a long-standing custom of “passing female students only after sleeping with them.”

He was accused of forcing a female student to understand that she would fail his course unless she agreed to have sex with him.

One of the sources, under anonymity, said the female student planned with her husband to entrap the lecturer while working with UNN security and other students.

The student source further said the security agents forcefully broke into his office and caught the lecturer “in action.”.

“It was planned out with her husband and security agents at the school. The female was made to approach the lecturer to offer him money in order to scale through his course. He refused and insisted he needed to have sexual intercourse with her in his office,” the source said.

“When the lady succumbed to his demands and asked him to undress, he was caught wearing only boxers.”

In the now-viral footage, a witness is heard saying, “We have been following this case from day one. We have all the chats, voice notes, video calls, and every conversation he had with the female student.”.

When contacted, UNN management told TheCable that Udoudom has now been suspended.

Okwun Omeaku, UNN’s acting media spokesperson, said the senior lecturer will be made to face the staff disciplinary panel.

“The indefinite suspension is with immediate effect pending the outcome of a disciplinary panel constituted by the university to investigate the incident,” he said.

“UNN has a zero tolerance for sexual misconduct involving our staff and students.

“We are committed to protecting our students from any form of abuse and exploitation. The university management will not hesitate to punish Mr. Mfonobong David Udoudom according to our rules if he is found guilty.”

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Yahaya Bello Took $720k From State Treasury To Pay His Child’s School Fees — EFCC Chairman Olukoyede

Published

on

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) chairman, Ola Olukoyede, claims that Yahaya Bello, the former governor of Kogi, took out $720,000 to cover his child’s upfront school fees.

Olukoyede made this known in Abuja on Tuesday during an interactive session with media executives.

The head of EFCC claimed that the former governor of Kogi transferred funds to a bureau de change operator and utilised them to pay his child’s school fees ahead of time.

Olukoyede added that Bello made the payment in anticipation that his tenure was gradually coming to an end.

“A sitting governor, because he knew he was leaving office, moved money directly from the government to bureau de change and used it to pay his child’s school fee in advance,” the EFCC boss said.

“Over $720,000 in anticipation that he was going to leave the government house. In a poor state like Kogi, you want me to close my eyes under the guise of ‘I’m being used’. Used by who? At this stage of my life.”

Olukoyede said he inherited the case file of the former Kogi governor, noting that he did not initiate the investigation against Bello.

On April 17, EFCC operatives laid siege on Bello’s residence in Abuja to arrest him over alleged N80 billion fraud.

While the EFCC operatives were at Bello’s residence, Usman Ododo, governor of Kogi, came to visit his predecessor.

Shortly after Ododo departed from the residence, the EFCC operatives also left the house.

Bello was reportedly rescued by Ododo when he departed his residence located in the Wuse Zone 4 district of Abuja.

Subsequently, the anti-graft agency declared the former governor wanted.

The Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) has also placed Bello on a watchlist.

The anti-graft agency alleged that Bello, alongside Alli Bello, chief of staff to Ododo; and one Daudu Suleiman, diverted about N80.2 billion belonging to the Kogi government.

Continue Reading

Most Popular