Connect with us


BIG STORY

Tax Review: Presidency Mounts Defence As 36 Governors Reject Proposal

Published

on

  • NEC Asks President To Withdraw Bill From NASS
  • Tinubu Panel Says Bill Not Against Governors

 

The 36 state governors of the federation have unilaterally demanded the immediate withdrawal of the National Tax Reforms Bill, delivering a significant strategic blow to the comprehensive efforts undertaken by the Taiwo Oyedele-led Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms committee.

The governors, speaking during the National Economic Council – Nigeria’s highest economic advisory body – meeting on Thursday, asked President Bola Tinubu to withdraw the Reforms Bill from the National Assembly for more comprehensive consultations.

Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, announced this as part of resolutions reached at the council’s 144th meeting chaired by Vice President Kashim Shettima at the State House, Abuja.

Makinde told journalists that council members agreed that it was necessary to allow for consensus building and understanding of the bills among Nigerians.

The meeting, which included a presentation by Oyedele, ultimately failed to persuade the governors regarding Tinubu’s plan to overhaul the taxation system aimed at achieving effective economic growth and increasing the tax-to-Gross Domestic Product ratio.

“Today (Thursday), NEC took a presentation from the Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms. The primary focus is fair taxation, responsible borrowing and sustainable spending,” Makinde stated.

“After extensive deliberation, NEC noted the need for sufficient alignment between and amongst the stakeholders for the proposed reforms.

“So, Council, therefore, recommend the need to withdraw the bill currently before the National Assembly on tax reforms so that we can have wider consultations and also build consensus around these reforms for the benefit of the entire country, and also to give people…for them to know the vision and where we are moving the country in terms of tax reforms because there is a lot of miscommunication, misinformation.

“Council advised that the bill be withdrawn from the National Assembly, and then there will be consultations afterwards.”

President Bola Tinubu and the Federal Executive Council recently sponsored a bill to restructure and streamline tax processes, establish a unified revenue service and simplify financial obligations for businesses and citizens.

The reforms stemmed from a month-long review of existing tax laws by the Oyedele-led committee inaugurated in August 2023.

The committee’s recommendations were harmonised into four executive bills. They include the Nigeria Tax Bill, which aims to eliminate unintended multiple taxation and make Nigeria’s economy more competitive by simplifying tax obligations for businesses and individuals nationwide.

Secondly, the Nigeria Tax Administration Bill proposes new rules governing the administration of all taxes in the country.

Its objective is to harmonise tax administrative processes across federal, state and local jurisdictions to ease taxpayers’ compliance in all parts of the country.

Thirdly, the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Bill seeks to rename the Federal Inland Revenue Service as the Nigeria Revenue Service to better reflect the mandate of the Service as the revenue agency for the entire federation, not just the Federal Government.

Fourthly, the Joint Revenue Board Establishment Bill proposes the creation of a Joint Revenue Board to replace the Joint Tax Board, covering federal and all states’ tax authorities.

The fourth bill also suggests establishing the Office of Tax Ombudsman under the Joint Revenue Board, serving as a complaint resolution body for taxpayers.

However, the Council called for a second look. Its decision came three days after the Northern Governors kicked against the reforms bill.

At its last meeting on October 28, the Northern Governors’ Forum, consisting of 19 governors from the region, rejected the new derivation-based model for Value-Added Tax distribution in the new tax reform bills before the National Assembly.

A communiqué read by the Chairman of the forum, Governor Muhammed Yahaya of Gombe State, said the proposition negates the interest of the North and other sub-nationals. The forum said the bill portends massive job losses and more economic turmoil for the region.

However, the Presidency said contrary to job loss fears and perceived marginalisation of the North, Tinubu’s tax reforms would benefit all states and harmonise the country’s tax laws for greater efficiency.

The Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, argued this in a statement titled, ‘Explainer: Proposed tax reform bills not against the north; they will benefit all states’ on Thursday.

Onanuga said the proposed laws would not increase the number of taxes currently in operation. Instead, they were designed to “optimise and simplify existing tax frameworks,” he said.

“It’s instructive to note that these proposed laws will not increase the number of taxes currently in operation. Instead, they are designed to optimise and simplify existing tax frameworks.

“The tax rates or percentages will remain the same under these reforms, as they focus on ensuring a more equitable distribution of tax obligations without adding to the burden on Nigerians.

“The reforms will not lead to job losses. On the contrary, they are structured to stimulate new avenues for job creation by supporting a dynamic, growth-oriented economy. Importantly, these laws will not absorb or eliminate the duties of any existing department, agency, or ministry. Instead, they aim to harmonise revenue collection and administration across the federation to ensure efficiency and cooperation.”

The Presidency reasoned that Nigeria’s current tax administration lacked coordination among federal, state, and local tax authorities, often leading to overlapping responsibilities, confusion and inefficiency.

“Without reform, this inefficiency will persist,” Onanuga said.

He argued that the proposed laws aimed to “coordinate efforts between different tiers of government, resulting in better tax resource management and greater clarity for taxpayers.”

Under existing laws, taxes like Company Income Tax, Personal Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Petroleum Profits Tax, Tertiary Education Tax, Value-Added Tax, and other taxing provisions in numerous laws are administered separately, with individual legislative frameworks.

However, “The proposed reforms seek to consolidate these multiple taxes, integrating CIT, PIT, CGT, VAT, PPT, and excise duties into a unified structure to reduce administrative fragmentation,” the statement read.

On the proposed derivation-based VAT distribution model, which the northern governors oppose, the Presidency argued that “the new proposal, as enunciated in the Bill, is designed to create a fairer system.”

It explained that the current model for distributing VAT is based on where the tax is remitted rather than where goods and services are supplied or consumed.

“The ongoing tax reform seeks to correct the inherent inequity in the current derivation model as a basis for distributing VAT revenue.

“The new proposal before the National Assembly outlines a different form of derivation which considers the place of supply or consumption for relevant goods and services.

“This means that states in the Northern region that produce the food we eat should not lose out just because their products are VAT-exempt or consumed in other states,” Onanuga wrote.

According to the Presidency, these reforms are critical to improving the lives of Nigerians and were not put forward by President Tinubu to undermine any part of the country.

“There is no better time than now for the National Assembly to give due consideration to these bills that will overhaul our tax systems and create the revenue all the tiers of government require to fund the development our country and people urgently need,” the statement concluded.

  • NASS Adjourns Plenary

Amidst the controversy trailing the tax reform bill, which was forwarded to the National Assembly by President Tinubu, both the Senate and the House of Representatives on Thursday unexpectedly adjourned plenary to November 19.

Early last month, when the Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service, Zacch Adedeji, had an interactive session with the Senate Committee on Finance on objectives of the tax reforms bill, a member of the committee, Dandutse Muntari, vowed that the proposed legislation would not see the light of the day.

The FIRS boss tried spiritedly to allay the fears of the lawmakers on possible tax increase but some of members of the committee said the time for such reform was not now.

The Senate on Wednesday listed the bill on its order paper for first reading but stood it down along with other items for screening and confirmation of appointments of the seven ministerial nominees forwarded to it by President Tinubu last week.

Alien to parliamentary practice, the bill was not listed on the order paper used by the Senate on Thursday for plenary proceedings.

Apparently disturbed by rejection of proposals contained in the bills by critical stakeholders like governors and Senators, including Ali Ndume (APC Borno South), Dandutse Muntari (APC Katsina South) and others, the Senate just about an hour into plenary, hurriedly moved into a closed door session .

Though the Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele (APC Ekiti Central), who moved motion for the hurried session, hinged it on matters relating to smooth running of the National Assembly, the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, after about two hours of the session, said members deliberated on matters of urgent national importance.

He said, “Distinguished colleagues, the Senate at the closed door session deliberated on matters of urgent national importance. Is this a true reflection of what transpired at the closed door session?”

The Senators responded in the affirmative.

What further made the adjournment unexpected was the fact that after the closed door session, the Senate only considered the report of its Committee on Agricultural Colleges and Institutions but stood down the three other items listed for consideration.

Like a bolt from the blues, the Senate President, after consideration of the report on the bill seeking for an Act for the establishment of University of Agriculture and Tropical Studies, Iragbiji in Osun State, announced adjournment of plenary to November 19 for oversight and committee engagements.

According to the parliamentary calendar, lawmakers usually do not go on recess at this time of the year, when the President is expected to submit the budget and other related documents.

Meanwhile, the deputy spokesman of the House of Representatives, Philip Agbese, said it was up to the Federal Government to decide what to do with the advice of the 36 states governors on the Tax Reform Bill.

Agbese stated this in an exclusive interview (with The Punch) on Thursday.

He said, “It is an executive bill. At the level of the National Economic Council, which is one of the strongest arms of the executive; it is also an advisory board.

“As a parliament, we would not like to preempt what the executive would do with the advice by the 36 state governors, that the bill should be withdrawn. It is what is before the parliament that we will consider.”

He pledged the readiness of the House to consider the bill on merit, saying, “The bill will be considered on its merit and debated squarely on the floor of the House of Reps dispassionately by members from North and South as well as people representing the eight political parties.

“We will support the bill if it will stop the hardship in the country and help to build our roads, schools and other infrastructures.”

  • Northern Governors Stand

It was gathered that the Sokoto State Governor, Ahmad Aliyu, had expressed readiness to stand by the resolution reached by the Northern Governors Forum on the bill at a meeting with the region’s top monarchs on Tuesday in Kaduna.

A top aide of the governor, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak on the matter, said the even though the governor had not made any official statement on the issue, he would stand by the resolution reached by the leaders of the region in Kaduna.

He said, “The governor will definitely work in tandem with the resolution reached with his colleagues in Kaduna. The governor is passionate about his people and what concerns them, he will work to protect their interest.

“The decision reached in Kaduna is not a personal opinion of one person but a collective one by leaders of the region, so, it is only the collective leaders that can say anything otherwise.”

On insinuations that the 19 northern governors might mobilise its National Assembly members against thwarting the bill, Special Adviser to the Plateau State Governor on Policy and Governance, Yiljap Abraham, stated, “I can’t say anything regarding that for now, but I think there is something the northern governors are doing that will go beyond what they have said .I think we just have to wait a little bit and then we hear about it “

It was learnt that the Niger State Governor Umar Bago was working in collaboration with the state’s lawmakers on the FG’s proposed tax reform bill.

The state Commissioner for Finance, Lawal Maikano, gave the hint on Thursday in a text message (to The Punch).

Maikano said, “The Governor is already on it (tax reform), and the assembly members are well aware of the position of the state.”

Following the Presidency comments on the proposed VAT Reform Bill as it is not against the interest of the North,

The Katsina State Governor’s Director-General, Media, Maiwada Danmallam, said Governor Dikko Umar Radda and the other governors in the region would reconvene to take further decisions on the issue.

He said, “It’s rather early for any state to react to this matter in isolation. The rejection of the proposed VAT reform was a collective decision by governors of the states, hence, it should be expected they have to reconvene as a body to review this development and decide their next line of action.”

 

Credit: The Punch

BIG STORY

Bulk Fuel Buyers Dump Middlemen For Direct Dangote Supply

Published

on

Bulk fuel buyers and filling station operators across the country are abandoning intermediaries in favour of direct delivery from the Dangote Refinery, following the launch of its free logistics fuel distribution initiative.

This development was disclosed by the President of the National Association of Road Transport Owners (NARTO), Yusuf Othman, during a live interview on TVC News. Othman criticised the refinery’s free delivery system, saying it is undermining existing agreements between bulk fuel users and transporters affiliated with NARTO.

Othman explained that NARTO members operate approximately 30,000 trucks and cannot afford to provide fuel transportation services at no cost. He noted that many of the agreements—both formal and informal—entered into with clients are now being jeopardised.

According to him, many companies had entered into service agreements with NARTO members, some of which were used as collateral to secure bank loans for the purchase of delivery trucks. He lamented that those deals are now under threat, as Dangote Refinery offers free direct delivery to customers.

“Although there has been no formal notification, we have received credible information that customers are being supplied directly, in violation of existing contracts. This has sparked widespread concern among our members,” Othman said.

He called on the Federal Government and the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) to intervene, citing Section 212 of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), which he claims prohibits such practices.

Othman urged the Dangote Group to consider the broader implications for other stakeholders in the industry, stating that while the refinery’s success is desirable, it should not come at the expense of other operators’ survival.

When contacted for further comments on Sunday, Othman declined to speak further, revealing that a truce was being considered to allow room for ongoing negotiations.

Prior to this development, middlemen typically procured fuel from depots or refineries and resold to bulk consumers. However, Dangote’s direct-to-customer supply strategy has shifted that model, with buyers now opting for cost-saving direct delivery.

The Dangote Refinery officially commenced its free fuel logistics programme last Monday. The initiative includes the deployment of over 1,000 compressed natural gas (CNG)-powered trucks to distribute fuel across key states.

According to the Dangote Group, the first phase of distribution will cover Lagos, Ogun, Ondo, Oyo, Osun, Ekiti, Edo, Delta, Rivers, Kwara, and Abuja. Plans are underway to expand nationwide as more trucks are added to the fleet.

The new scheme also includes a reduction in pump prices. In Lagos and other South-West states, fuel will retail at N841 per litre, while in Abuja, Rivers, Delta, Edo, and Kwara, the price will be N851 per litre.

In a statement, Dangote Group confirmed that the first deployment phase includes the Federal Capital Territory, Lagos, Kwara, Delta, Edo, Rivers, and South-West states, with nationwide coverage planned as truck availability improves.

Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) President, Abubakar Shettima, confirmed on Friday that deliveries had already commenced. He said Dangote’s trucks were discharging fuel at no cost in several Western states.

Shettima stated that the scheme is operational in Lagos, Ogun, Ondo, and Oyo, adding that the proximity of these areas to the refinery has facilitated early rollout.

He added that marketers under IPMAN were pleased with the arrangement, and confirmed that his members have started receiving products under the free delivery initiative.

Speaking on the pricing, Shettima explained that fuel prices would drop from N865 to N841 per litre at the pump once the Dangote-supplied fuel reaches more stations.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Benjamin Kalu: Fear Of Hijack Won’t Stop Creation Of State Police

Published

on

Benjamin Kalu, deputy speaker of the House of Representatives, says concerns about hijack should not prevent the creation of state police.

The national assembly is currently amending the 1999 constitution with the state police bill among the key proposals under consideration.

President Bola Tinubu and several governors have backed the move, saying it would tackle the nation’s prolonged security issues like banditry, kidnappings, and other violent crimes.

“I am reviewing all the aspects of security; I have to create state police. We are looking at that holistically,” Tinubu said early this month.

However, analysts have raised concerns that governors could abuse state police by weaponizing them against the opposition.

‘IT’S FOR GREATER GOOD’

Speaking with journalists on Saturday in Abuja, Kalu, who chairs the House Committee on Constitutional Review, said the unbundling of the current police structure would improve the nation’s security.

“On the state police bill before the parliament, we are thinking about the response time of policing in Nigeria, which at the moment is below the global standard,” he said.

“The only way we can achieve this is if we unbundle it from how it is centralized, like other countries do: Municipal police, and state police.

“Just [as] the constitution is clear on what is on the concurrent and exclusive lists, certain subject matters will now be handled by the state and federal police, respectively.

“Let’s have this conversation on issues like this to know whether you want it or not, or should it be tailored in one way or another.

“There may be fears of hijacking it, but we cannot deny the majority of Nigerians the security of lives and property that we promised them as a government.

“So, we should look at the bigger picture. Everyone in Nigeria may not be a politician, but everyone needs the security of life and property.

“So, we are saying which one should we go for? The greater good or the fear of the minor threat? I think we should go for the greater good so that the good in the majority will suppress the threat in the minority.”

On demand for diaspora voting, Kalu warned that Nigeria must strengthen its local electoral system before allowing citizens to vote abroad.

“Rome was not built in a day. It will happen, but we must first put our house in order. If Nigerians say during constitutional amendment hearings that they want it, we will look at the possibility,” he said.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Over N2Trillion Siphoned In Fraudulent Fuel Subsidy Claims Under Jonathan —– Otedola

Published

on

Billionaire businessman, Mr Femi Otedola, yesterday said more than N2 trillion was siphoned in questionable fuel subsidy claims under the Goodluck Jonathan administration, narrating how he warned the ex-President about fraudulent oil marketers at the time.

In a statement on recent issues in the oil and gas sector, especially in the downstream, Otedola also congratulated Aliko Dangote, on the success achieved so far since his refinery commenced operations, describing it as a historic leap for Nigeria’s energy independence and economic future.

The philanthropist maintained that all these fraudulent subsidy claims were tied to depot licenses, noting that the policy rewarded neither transparency nor innovation, but encouraged rent-seeking and corruption.

“On subsidy, I personally warned President Goodluck Jonathan that he was being misled. The system was built to benefit depot owners, and DAPPMAN (Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association of Nigeria) members became the primary beneficiaries.

“Over N2 trillion was siphoned through questionable claims, all tied to depot licenses. The policy rewarded neither transparency nor innovation, it encouraged rent-seeking and corruption,” the business mogul stated.

But more importantly, he noted that credit must go to President Bola Tinubu for doing what no other leader before him had the political will to execute, which is the full deregulation of the downstream petroleum sector.

This singular act, he said, has broken the grip of entrenched interests and ushered in a new era of transparency, healthy competition, and customer-centric service delivery.

“In a sector long plagued by rent-seeking, subsidy fraud, product diversion, and smuggling, this reform marks a decisive break from the past and lays the foundation for a more efficient and accountable energy market. Yet despite this progress, there are still voices clinging to the old ways. Voices determined to resist change, even when it’s clear the tide has turned,” Otedola wrote.

Besides, having followed recent commentary around fuel supply issues, Otedola said that he felt compelled to provide some perspective, especially as it relates to the future of the country, pointing out that Nigeria remains threatened by entrenched cabals who still believe they can block the winds of reform.

Specifically, Otedola took on DAPPMAN, a group of oil marketers that has had a running battle with the Dangote Refinery in recent days on the ground of alleged plans by Dangote to monopolise the sector.

Otedola, going down memory lane, recalled that he founded DAPPMAN 23 years ago, specifically in 2002, with a clear mission to challenge the dominance of the major marketers and give independent depot owners a fair platform to thrive.

According to him, at the time, the association aimed to fill critical supply gaps left by an inefficient downstream system. However, he emphasised that since then, times have changed, with many of the original players having exited the scene, and those left, clinging to assets that no longer reflect today’s business realities.

“But history has shown time and again: you can delay change, frustrate it, even sabotage it but you can never stop it. I founded DAPPMAN in 2002 (23 years ago) with a clear mission, to challenge the dominance of the major marketers and give independent depot owners a fair platform to thrive.

“I personally structured the group, appointing the late George Enenmoh, then Managing Director of Ascon Oil, as Chairman, while I served as Vice Chairman and Sayyu Dantata as Secretary. At the time, depot ownership was strategic. We were filling critical supply gaps left by an inefficient system.

“But times have changed. Many of the original players have exited the scene, and those left are clinging to assets that no longer reflect today’s business realities . I advised some of them as far back as last year to sell their depots as scrap while they still had value. Nigeria now has over 4 million metric tons of storage capacity, most of it idle. With the Dangote Refinery now supplying fuel locally, the old business model is crumbling.

“Zenon Oil pioneered the modern diesel business in Nigeria and grew to become the largest supplier in the country. We built depots to store our imported diesel because the market was import-driven and riddled with inefficiencies. But with Dangote’s refinery fully operational, those gaps no longer exist.

“We now have domestic production and local supply efficient, reliable, and proudly Nigerian. Furthermore, we must not fail to recognise the attendant benefits of eliminating the grid lock around the Ibafon , Tincan and Apapa areas due to the operations of the Dangote Refinery,” Otedola argued.

Today, more than just producing fuel, Otedola noted that Aliko Dangote has elevated the entire logistics chain, purchasing 8,000 brand new CNG eco-friendly trucks that will distribute across the country with less pollution and fewer breakdowns, unlike the aging, rickety trucks still used by some operators.

He added: “I know this business intimately. I was king of it and at the peak of it in 2005 (20 years ago) , I was conferred with the life patron of the PTD (Petroleum Tanker Drivers) union by Mr Akinlaja. So, when I say the game has changed, I speak from deep experience.

“What is DAPPMAN fighting for today? To preserve a model built on fuel imports, subsidy exploitation, and outdated infrastructure? That era is fast disappearing. The setting up of depots was mainly to collect PFIs. No depots, no PFIs (Pro Forma Invoices) from NNPC who were sole suppliers of gasoline (petrol) at the time and which thus led to the breeding of complacent importers whose sole agenda was on arbitrage and subsidy margins.”

Since there are no more PFIs, the businessman argued that there is no reason why the Dangote Refinery should subsidise DAPPMAN with N1.5 trillion which they are asking Dangote Refinery to pay and subsequently pass this cost to consumers.

While saluting the courage of ‘my brother Aliko Dangote, like Amazon Incorporated’ in bringing about transformative change in the downstream sector, Otedola emphasised that the myth that depots generate massive employment was untrue.

“Depots do not drive employment as some claim. A typical depot employs perhaps five people, gatekeeper included. In contrast, a single filling station can provide jobs to dozens of Nigerians—from pump attendants to cashiers, security personnel, and cleaners.

“If anything, DAPPMAN members should be focusing on owning and scaling last-mile retail outlets, not holding on to tanks built for a fuel import economy that no longer serves us”, he stated.

Taking a cue from the global picture, the philanthropist pointed out that depots in Amsterdam or Houston were designed to serve export markets, especially Africa, but that with Nigeria now refining locally, such infrastructure is increasingly unnecessary.

“The same thing happened in the cement industry. Once Nigeria started producing cement locally, the bulk carriers that used to dock at our ports were retired, many sold as scrap. The same outcome awaits fuel depots,” he said.

If DAPPMAN members do not adapt, Otedola argued that they will not only become irrelevant, but that they may go bankrupt.

Instead of resisting progress, he urged them to consider selling, restructuring, or investing in new value chains, explaining that if they truly believe in competition, they could even come together and acquire the Port Harcourt Refinery and see if they can succeed where NNPC could not.

Even in developed markets, he stated that refinery operators are downsizing their depot footprint, with many converting them into bonded warehouses or exiting completely and mentioning the case of the Folawiyo Group, known for its foresight and integrity, which sold its depot and exited early. “That is strategic thinking,” he posited.

“DAPPMAN had its place but today, its relevance is fast fading. We must stop clinging to outdated privileges and focus on a new era built on self-sufficiency, transparency, and sustainable value creation. Aliko’s refinery is not the problem. It is the solution. Let’s move forward,” he stated.

Stressing that Africans are proud of Aliko Dangote, he said: “And yes, my dear brother Aliko, you can now go to Monaco and rest jejely like me. You’ve earned it.”

Continue Reading


 

 


 

 

 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular