Connect with us


Lagos Catholic Archbishop Emeritus of Lagos Archdiocese, Anthony Cardinal Okogie has asked President Muhammadu to focus more on the security challenges facing the country than preparing for the 2019 elections.

According to him, security is more important than the election.

Okogie also charged Nigerians to demand from the current government the whereabouts of those responsible for the killing of Nigerians in different parts of the country, insisting: “what is the Federal Government and its security agencies waiting for?”

In a memo made available to Vanguard yesterday, titled “WHO AND WHERE ARE THE CRIMINALS? What a Nation!”, Okogie who has written several letters to question certain unpleasant happenings in the polity while politicians are busy scheming for re-election, said the matter of security “must be rightly addressed without sweeping any item under the carpet. It is by far more important than getting elected or re-elected in 2019.”

According to him: “Everyone is talking about crime. Tell me, who are the criminals?” So sang, more than 40 years ago, the Jamaican artiste Peter Torsh in his album “Equal rights”. Today, that question has become extraordinarily pertinent in our beloved country Nigeria.

”Here in Nigeria, we talk of armed robbery, kidnapping, and now, murder by herdsmen. But who and where are the criminals? Are we pretending not to know them? And are we pretending not to know where they are? But our God of JUSTICE looks on!
“Nigerians are familiar with the drama of parading suspects. On prime time television, the police treats us to it.

Some men and women are apprehended by the police, made to sit by dangerous weapons, and paraded as criminals. And the story ends there. We hear of no prosecution, no conviction, no sentencing.”

Apart from the fact that such drama amounts to media trial, pronouncing them guilty even before they are arraigned as prescribed by law, we never get to know if indeed they are the criminals. What has happened to the many suspects paraded in the media by the Nigeria Police? And what has happened to the dangerous weapons supposedly seized from them? Our government and its security agencies, if indeed they are responsible and accountable, owe Nigerians some credible explanations.

The recent terrorist acts of herdsmen and the way the Federal Government has reacted—its spokespersons and the security agencies—bear a disturbing resemblance to the issue of dramatized parade of suspects. The laws of this country were broken by those who butchered citizens of Nigeria the way they would butcher their cows. First, the reactions of leaders of Miyetti Allah, by way of self-implication, did little to hide the identity of the criminals.

Secondly, government officials came up with contradictory explanations. Some government officials blamed it on the fact that the herdsmen were not treated as Nigerian brothers. We were told the herdsmen acted in such unparalleled barbarism because they were not accommodated by their fellow Nigerians. We were treated to the tale that the herdsmen committed such heinous crimes because of a law made by a state government.

We were told, by the Inspector General of Police, that the killings were consequences of communal clashes. In other words, clashes among communities of Nigerians. The Minister of Defence, for his part, even went as far as painting the picture of murderous herdsmen as Nigerians denied access to grazing route by farmers.

Then, in grotesque contradiction, the Directorate of State Security, DSS, said perpetrators of this crime were not Nigerian herdsmen but members of the Islamic State in West Africa.

Officials of the federal government cannot, on the one hand, say these butchers are Nigerians in need of accommodation by fellow Nigerians, and, on the other hand, turn around and say they are foreigners. The two explanations amount to a simple fault of logic. No public office holder who offers such explanations deserves to spend one more minute in office. He should either tender his resignation or be fired. He cannot be counted upon to secure the people.

But apart from the fact that such utterances insult the intelligence of Nigerians, they beg the issue. The issue is neither the nationality nor the ethnic affiliation nor the religious identity of the herdsmen. The issue is the crime they committed. In Nigeria, the crime of murder is punishable by law. Our government cannot pretend not to know who the criminals are. The issue is: where are the criminals? Why have leaders of Miyetti Allah not been called in for interrogation?.

Since security is de facto in the hands of the Federal Government, these are questions the government has a non-negotiable moral obligation to answer. Setting up a committee to prevent a reoccurrence is a good idea. But that does not justify the fact that these murderers are still walking and talking freely.

It is cruel and cynical to subject security matters to the manipulation of our religious and ethnic differences. It is utterly unbecoming of statesmen to prioritize political calculations over the value of life and property. Every Nigerian citizen is special. The rights that belong to us by virtue of being human beings and citizens are to be protected at all times.

It is no longer news that our country has become a bye-word in the comity of nations. The international community looks with wonder at a country so tall on promise but short on delivery. The way our government mishandles matters of security gives the rest of the world the impression that we cannot govern ourselves. Little wonder derogatory words are used to describe us. But we can, and we must change the negative perception by doing things the right way. At this point in time, the matter of security must be rightly addressed without sweeping any item under the carpet. It is by far more important than getting elected or re-elected in 2019.

Since the Federal Government controls the security agencies, we Nigerians must insist that this government furnish us with credible answers to these and related questions: who and where are the criminals? Where are the people who kill Nigerians? Why have they not appeared in court? What is the Federal Government and its security agencies waiting for?

BIG STORY

Road To 2027: Tinubu Not Threatened By Obasanjo, Kwankwaso, Obi’s Talks — APC

Published

on

The ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), on Sunday, stated that it was not intimidated by the weekend visit of former presidential flag-bearer of the New Nigeria People’s Party, Senator Rabiu Kwankwaso, and former Cross River State governor, Donald Duke, to the Abeokuta, Ogun State home of ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo “to discuss the political future of Nigeria.”

In recent weeks, there have been growing debates about the 2027 general elections after the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume, advocated for the re-election of President Bola Tinubu for a second term.

According to Akume, there will be no vacancy in Aso Rock until 2031, when Tinubu would have completed a second term.

However, the opposition has rejected this notion, insisting that the ruling APC would be removed from power by 2027.

Over the weekend, Kwankwaso and Duke, a 2007 presidential aspirant, visited ex-President Obasanjo in Abeokuta and held a closed-door meeting.

Although the specifics of their discussions remain undisclosed, sources close to the leaders suggested that the meeting was part of a broader effort to strategize for Nigeria’s 2027 general elections.

Obasanjo, a key figure in Nigerian politics, has been actively engaging various stakeholders to explore alternatives to the ruling APC and the opposition Peoples Democratic Party.

The ex-President has recently been highly critical of Tinubu’s administration, condemning alleged corruption and rising debt burdens.

Kwankwaso, an influential figure in Kano State politics, brings significant clout and followership, while Duke, a former governor from the southern region, is expected to offer his unique perspective on governance and national unity.

Though the details of their conversation remain confidential, Kwankwaso’s statement after the meeting suggested a collective intention to challenge the existing political structure and pave the way for a new direction in Nigeria’s political landscape.

Confirming the meeting via his verified Facebook page, Kwankwaso stated, “I was pleased to be in the company of my friend, His Excellency Donald Duke, and other associates to pay a courtesy call on former President Olusegun Obasanjo at his residence in Abeokuta.”

He added, “Deliberations on significant national issues, including the future of politics and governance in Nigeria, defined the conversation. We are grateful to Baba for his warm reception, support, and hospitality.”

However, responding to the development in an interview (with The Punch) on Sunday, the National Publicity Director of the ruling APC, Bala Ibrahim, dismissed the meeting as a potential threat to APC continuity.

Ibrahim asserted that Tinubu’s political stature and relevance in contemporary politics had far surpassed those of the opposition figures and statesmen.

He said, “With due respect, I hold Obasanjo in high esteem. As a former President, ex-Head of State, and an elder statesman, I don’t want to take issues with him. But when it comes to the politics of Nigeria, particularly contemporary politics, Tinubu is not their mate.”

“Tinubu is head and shoulders above them in modern politics in Nigeria. So the combination of Obasanjo, Kwankwaso, Peter Obi, and Donald Duke, who was my schoolmate, does not present a threat to Tinubu. These are people who were trashed in the last election.”

“This is not the first time Obasanjo has rallied around someone, and that person was defeated. Remember, he supported (ex-President Goodluck) Jonathan, who later lost to Buhari. Obasanjo supported another candidate, Peter Obi, in the last election again and Tinubu trounced them.”

“So they can have marathon meetings and meet till the end of time, they will not present any threat to the government of APC. Who among Kwankwaso, Obasanjo, Obi, and Duke was not beaten? If they are bringing angels, it’s a different story. But if it is these same spent forces that will combine and meet, their meeting cannot bring any good outcome.”

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Rowdy Session As Another LP Reps Defects To APC, Cites Leadership Crisis

Published

on

The member representing Jos South and East Federal Constituency, “Alfred Illiya Ajang,” has defected from the Labour Party (LP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

In a letter read by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, “Tajudeen Abbas,” during plenary on Thursday, the now-defected member claimed that the crisis in the Labour Party was the reason for his defection.

The House was thrown into a rowdy session as some lawmakers raised eyebrows over the content of the letter.

Lending his voice, Minority Leader “Kingsley Chinda” says the letter is not in accordance with the constitution of the House and, as such, should be rejected.

He said that as a standing order, any member who wishes to defect must first inform his constituents and party members on the platform on which he was elected before any letter is read.

Chinda argued that since this criterion has not been met, the letter should not be admitted.

The speaker, however, overrode the observation.

Meanwhile, a former Minister of Labour and Employment and now-serving senator “Simon Lalong” was at the House of Representatives complex to witness the defection and give support to his colleague.

The House had earlier suspended its rules to admit Lalong, representing Plateau South senatorial district.

His defection from the LP to the ruling APC adds to the swelling number of federal lawmakers dumping one of Nigeria’s main opposition parties.

A few days back, another lawmaker, “Dalyop Chollom,” representing Barkin Ladi/Riyom Federal Constituency, dumped the LP for the APC. He cited the crisis in the party as his reason.

Some weeks back, four members of the House of Representatives dumped the LP for the ruling party, citing squabbles in the Labour Party.

Following their defection, the LP threatened legal action and claimed their action was unconstitutional.

The Labour Party made inroads in national politics in the 2023 general election years after its formation. It got six Senate and 34 House of Representatives seats.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

BREAKING: Atiku’s Former Aide Daniel Bwala Decamps To APC

Published

on

Daniel Bwala, Atiku Abubakar’s former aide, has decamped to the All Progressive Congress.

This comes weeks after President Tinubu appointed him as his special adviser on media and public communication then later changed his portfolio to SA on policy communication.

In a post on his X (former twitter) page, Bwala posted a picture of him at the APC media centre and captioned it ‘Sweet Home’.

This however, is a fulfillment of the prediction of many after the former PDP apologist accepted to serve the APC government.

Meanwhile, Bwala used to be with the APC before he left for the camp of Atiku’s PDP during the 2023 presidential election campaign.

Continue Reading

Most Popular