Connect with us

BIG STORY

JUST IN: UK Announces Social Media Ban For Children Under 16

Published

on

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday announced a forthcoming total ban on social media for children under 16, saying that such platforms are “making children unhappy”.

Starmer said that the government “will ban access to social media for all children under the age of 16”, warning that these platforms are “exposing them to content that is dangerous” and “designed to be addictive”.

The government said the ban will “include platforms like Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and X” but not messaging services such as WhatsApp.

He added he hoped to pass the regulation by late December and for the ban to come into force in the spring next year.

The prime minister also said the government would go further and take “world-leading action on gaming services and live streaming platforms”.

The government said in a statement it would also be considering overnight curfews and breaks in infinite scrolling for under-18s, and would announce more details in July.

Starmer said the upcoming ban was influenced by the experience of Australia, which in December became the first nation to ban people under 16 from social media.

The announcement follows a government-led consultation where British teenagers trialled social media bans and time limits on apps.

A spokesperson for YouTube responded with a warning that such a blanket ban would push children towards “less safe services”.

Starmer said that the government was “taking action” on gaming services and live streaming platforms that allow strangers to contact children.

“Is there a situation in the offline world where you would just let your child pair up with a stranger? An adult that you don’t know about? No. So we’re taking action on that,” he said, without giving details.

Canada’s culture minister last week introduced legislation that would ban children under 16 from having social media accounts and require AI chatbot services to limit production of harmful content.

The proposed Digital Safety Act makes Canada the latest in a number of countries cracking down on social media platforms over concerns of harm to children.

Indonesia began enforcing its own social media ban for users under the age of 16 in March, while several European governments have announced their desire to make similar moves.

‘Moral Responsibility’

The UK government’s consultation on the issue, which closed in late May, attracted about 116,000 contributions, making it the second-largest response ever received.

Over 83 percent of parents who responded said the risks posed by social media outweighed the benefits for children, with 91 percent backing a minimum age of 16.

The UK announcement comes a week after the government said tech giants must stop children in Britain from being able to send and receive nude images on their devices.

Britain’s interior ministry said it was giving companies, including Apple and Google, three months to introduce safety features to block children from taking and accessing naked photos on phones and tablets.

If they failed to do so, the government would introduce legislation forcing them to activate the technology, it warned.

Starmer’s centre-left Labour government said technology companies had a “moral responsibility” to “protect children from coercion, abuse and sextortion”.

A law change would stop children from being able to access pornography, while also making it more difficult for child abusers to target children, it said.

According to analysis by the Internet Watch Foundation charity cited by the government, 91 percent of online child sexual abuse reports recorded in 2024 contained self-generated content from children themselves.

AFP

BIG STORY

JUST IN: Police Confirm Arrest of ‘Fake’ Agency DG Adeniyi Adeyemi in Osun

Published

on

Operatives of the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) have arrested Adeniyi Adeyemi, director-general of the “controversial” Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC).

Abiodun Ojelabi, police spokesperson in Osun, confirmed the arrest to the media, saying Adeyemi was apprehended in the state on Tuesday.

Earlier, a federal high court in Abuja ordered Adeyemi’s arrest after he failed to honour the court’s summons in the alleged forgery case.

The spokesperson of the Osun Police Command, Abiodun Ojelabi, told newsmen that Adeniyi was arrested in his hideout in Osun by the Intelligence Response Team from Abuja. He is likely to be transferred to Abuja later today.

“Yes, it is confirmed. The Intelligence Response Team from Abuja arrested him here in Osun,” Ojelabi said.

A video of the arrest showed Adeyemi dressed in a light blue traditional outfit while surrounded by security operatives.

In the footage, he appeared serious and visibly concerned as he responded to questions from officers.

When asked to identify himself, Adeyemi initially declined to give a direct response.

“I’ve mentioned it, sir,” he said.

The officers insisted that he state his name again.

“Mention it for us, please. What is your name? What is your name?” one of the officers asked.

Adeyemi replied, “I’ve said it several times.”

His arrest came hours after Justice Mohammed Umar of the Federal High Court in Abuja ordered his arrest following his failure to appear for arraignment over alleged conspiracy, forgery and impersonation.

According to the court, the defendant would be compelled to appear and face trial.

The judge subsequently adjourned the matter until September 30, 2026, for arraignment.

Adeyemi’s arrest comes barely a day after he publicly denied reports that he was evading security agencies.

Speaking during an interview on Channels Television on Monday, he had insisted he was not hiding.

“I’m ready to show my face. I’m not hiding. I’m only fearing for my life because I have it on good authority that my life is in danger.

“There have been several attempts on my life.”

He also repeated his allegation that he paid ₦400 million through an intermediary to secure his appointment as Director-General of the disputed council and called for an independent investigation into the controversy.

The police had accused Adeyemi of forging several official documents, including a purported presidential appointment letter allegedly signed by the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, as well as other government documents used to present the council as a legitimate federal agency.

Investigators also alleged that Adeyemi falsely presented himself as the Director-General of the council and operated from an office within the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja.

If convicted on the forgery-related charges, he faces up to 21 years’ imprisonment without the option of a fine, while the impersonation charge carries a maximum sentence of three years’ imprisonment or a fine.

 

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Final South Africa Repatriation Flight to Arrive Lagos Wednesday

Published

on

The federal government’s final evacuation flight from South Africa will land in Lagos on Wednesday.

In a statement on Tuesday, Kimiebi Ebienfa, spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said the flight, operated by Air Peace, is expected to depart Johannesburg with 315 returnees at 1:30 am.

Ebienfa pegged the estimated time of arrival at the Murtala Mohammed International Airport at 6.30 am.

It would be the government’s fifth evacuation flight and the seventh batch of Nigerians to be repatriated from South Africa following the xenophobic violence.

Over 1,000 Nigerians were said to have indicated interest in returning.

The fourth evacuation flight arrived on July 9 with 282 returnees, bringing the total number of Nigerians repatriated from South Africa since the evacuation flights began on June 11 to 1,141.

Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, minister of foreign affairs, asked Nigerians to take advantage of the ongoing exercise to return home.

Odumegwu-Ojukwu’s call came as two more Nigerians were reported dead in South Africa, bringing the official death toll of Nigerian citizens in the country since the latest xenophobic violence to four.

Some repatriated Nigerians have alleged that the figures are higher.

The minister assured that the federal government would ensure that no citizen who expressed interest in returning home would be left behind.

 

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

‘No Immigrant Should Stay in the UK Forever’ — Kemi Badenoch Sparks Fresh Row

Published

on

Leader of the UK Conservative Party, Kemi Badenoch, has said immigrants who arrive in Britain on temporary work visas should not automatically be allowed to remain in the country permanently, urging the Labour government to retain its proposed 10-year qualifying period for indefinite leave to remain.

Badenoch made the remarks in a post shared on her X handle on Monday while releasing a letter addressed to the UK’s Home Secretary.

In the post, she criticised calls by some Labour lawmakers for the government to soften its planned immigration reforms.

“People who come to Britain on temporary work visas should not automatically be able to stay forever.

“This Labour government was right to make that harder. Now their MPs want them to u-turn.

“Conservatives will back Labour’s original plan to help get it through Parliament,” she wrote.

The letter, jointly signed by Badenoch and the Shadow Home Secretary, Chris Philp, expressed concern over reports that the Labour government was considering exempting around two million migrants who entered the United Kingdom on work visas between 2021 and the present from the proposed extension of the qualifying period for indefinite leave to remain.

The Conservative leader described such a move as “a grave mistake,” insisting that Britain had previously experienced the consequences of allowing migrants to obtain permanent settlement too quickly.

“As Conservatives learned to our cost, five years is too short a time to obtain the indefinite right to remain in the UK,” the letter read.

She argued that many migrants currently working in low-paid and low-skilled jobs could be replaced by economically inactive British citizens if appropriate opportunities were created.

“Many of these immigrants are working in low-wage, low-skilled jobs which could be done by some of the 9 million economically inactive British citizens,” she stated.

According to Badenoch, migrants who fail to make what she described as a significant economic contribution over a decade should return to their home countries once their temporary work visas expire.

“Individuals who are not making a significant economic contribution over a ten-year period should not be allowed to stay indefinitely. Those not working, or working in low-paid jobs, should be required to go home at the end of their temporary work visa,” she added.

The Conservative leader also argued that granting indefinite leave to remain after only five years would place additional pressure on the UK’s welfare system because successful applicants become entitled to social benefits and can subsequently apply for British citizenship.

“Receiving ILR currently carries full entitlement to receive benefits. Even if this were restricted for an additional qualification period as some have called for, as things stand, the migrants concerned would become eligible for British citizenship a year after receiving ILR, and it would be very difficult to restrict benefits for citizens,” the letter said.

She further noted that there was currently no provision in the Immigration and Asylum Bill or existing legislation that would allow the government to alter welfare entitlements for people granted indefinite leave to remain.

Badenoch maintained that extending the qualifying period from five years to 10 years would not amount to a retrospective change because temporary work visas do not guarantee permanent settlement.

“The government is perfectly entitled to decide at any time the rules on indefinite rights of settlement, including in relation to those here already.

“No one who has come here on a temporary work visa should have the automatic right to stay forever, and changing the rules to extend the qualification period and add conditions for new applications does not constitute a retrospective change,” she wrote.

In the letter, Badenoch also offered the Conservative Party’s support if Labour decides to proceed with its original proposal without amendments.

“If you table the proposals set out last autumn in undiluted form, either in the Immigration Rules or as part of the Immigration and Asylum Bill, we will support them.

“In government we would of course go further, but on this time-sensitive matter we make this offer to cooperate in the national interest,” she stated.

She said the government’s decision on the matter would ultimately show whether Labour was genuinely committed to reducing immigration and strengthening border controls.

“Whether or not you stand by your own proposals is a test of whether the Labour Party is serious about controlling our borders — or not,” the letter added.

The letter was also copied to Andy Burnham, whom Badenoch referred to as the anticipated incoming Prime Minister, as political debate over the future direction of the UK’s immigration policy continues.

Continue Reading


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular


Warning: Undefined array key "slug" in /home/porsch10/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php on line 2117

Warning: Undefined array key "slug" in /home/porsch10/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php on line 2117

Warning: Undefined array key "slug" in /home/porsch10/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php on line 2117