Connect with us


BIG STORY

Electoral Act: Senate Finally Bows To Buhari, Includes Consensus For Party Primaries

Published

on

The Senate added the consensus primary option in the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill on Wednesday, as requested by President Muhammadu Buhari.

Compulsory direct primaries were removed from the bill by both chambers of the National Assembly, the Senate, and the House of Representatives.

While the House allowed parties to choose between direct and indirect primaries, the Senate allowed for both, as well as a consensus approach, as indicated by President Obama in a recent interview with Channels Television.

During the interview, Buhari stated that, in addition to direct and indirect primaries, lawmakers should include consensus.

He said, “All I said (is that) there should be options,” he said. “We must not insist that it has to be direct; it should be consensus and indirect.”

Buhari had last year vetoed the electoral bill and sent it back to the National Assembly over the restriction of political parties to direct primaries.

Both the Senate and the House of Representatives had suspended action on the bill till resumption on Tuesday, after the Christmas and New Year break.

On Wednesday, the House of Representatives amended Clause Section 87 of the Electoral Act 2010 which is Clause 84 of the electoral bill, by inserting the indirect primary option.

The Senate, however, adopted Clause 84(2) as recommended by the Committee of the Whole and approved direct primary, indirect primary or consensus as the procedure for the nomination of candidates by political parties for elections.

The disagreement between both houses is expected to delay the passage of the bill.

The Senate also approved the recommended Clause 84(3) which prescribes that “A political party that adopts the direct primaries procedure shall ensure that all aspirants are given equal opportunity of being voted for by members of the party and shall adopt the procedure outlined below: (a) In the case of Presidential Primaries, all registered members of the party are to vote for aspirants of their choice at a designated centre at each ward of the federation.

It provides further that, “similar procedure as in (a) above, shall be adopted for governorship senatorial, federal and state constituencies.

The Majority Leader of the Senate, Yahaya Abdullahi (APC/Kebbi-North), had moved a motion for the recommittal of the bill to the Committee of the Whole.

Abdullahi noted that the motion was against the backdrop of the “need to address the observation by Mr President and make necessary amendment in accordance with Order 87(c) of the Senate Standing Orders, 2022 (as amended); and relying on order 1(b) and 52(6) of the Senate Standing Orders, 2022 ( as amended).”

The Senate’s move, it was learnt, was based on the request by the President

However, it was not a smooth ride for the bill at the House. There was tension in the House as members were divided on whether to amend the legislation or override the President’s vote.

At the opening of plenary on Wednesday, the Speaker, Femi Gbajabiamila, beckoned on some leaders of the House, who approached his seat.

Shortly after, other leaders and ranking members of the House joined the meeting.

Those who met with Gbajabiamila included the Deputy Speaker, Ahmed Wase; Majority Leader, Alhassan Ado-Doguwa; Minority Leader, Ndudi Elumelu; Chairman, House Committee on Finance, James Faleke; Chairman, House Committee on Defence, Babajimi Benson, among others.

Other lawmakers watched as they engaged themselves in arguments for over 15 minutes.

Our correspondent observed that Elumelu was particularly in disagreement with what was being said by others at the meeting.

Gbajabiamila consequently called for an executive (closed-door) session, which lasted about 30 minutes.

As the chamber was opened, there was noise in the chamber, which showed that there was a disagreement among the lawmakers.

Elumelu and the Deputy Minority Leader, Toby Okechukwu, led other opposition members to a corner of the chamber where they met for about five minutes, agreed on what to do and dispersed to their respective seats.

As the Speaker called the chamber to order, he asked that all items on the day’s order paper be stepped down except the recommittal of the electoral bill – Item 6, being the first motion of the day; and Item 9, being the first report for consideration.

Chairman of the House Committee on Rules and Business, Abubakar Fulata, moved the motion for the recommittal to the Committee of the Whole. Elumelu seconded the motion.

Ado-Doguwa moved the motion that the House dissolve into Committee of the Whole to consider the bill, while Leke Abejide seconded the motion.

At the Committee of the Whole, consideration of the bill did not start until 18 minutes, during which the lawmakers conferred with themselves in groups and copies of the legislation were distributed to them.

The Speaker recalled how Buhari withheld assent to the bill, read out Paragraph 5 of the President’s letter to the National Assembly. Gbajabiamila also cited Order 12 Rule 20 of the Standing Orders of the House which prescribed how the lawmakers should go about rejected bills.

Considering the report by the Committee of the Whole, Gbajabiamila put the amended Clause 84(2) to voice vote and it was unanimously adopted.

The clause now reads, ‘The procedure for nomination of candidates by political parties for various elective positions shall be by direct primaries or indirect primaries.’

As the House was to revert to plenary, an opposition member, Dagomie Abiante (PDP/Rivers) raised a point of order to say that “there are other errors,” which Gbajabiamila said were “being looked into.”

The Speaker, however, ruled him out of order, stating that the rules of the House, which he had read out, were specific about the process and the lawmakers were bound by the limitations. “We are confined to the observations made by Mr President. We have a near-perfect document; it may not be perfect but we have a near-perfect document,” he stated.

After Gbajabiamila overruled Abiante, several lawmakers approached the Speaker where they were seen pointing out things in the bill to him.

We amended only Clause 84(2) –  Gbajabiamila

After the meeting that lasted about 10 minutes, the House adopted the report from the Committee of the Whole.

The Speaker explained what had been done to the bill, saying, “For emphasis’ sake, I need to state categorically that what was considered and adopted by the House was only a clause and that was Clause 84(2). “

Chairman of the House Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Benjamin Kalu, who addressed journalists after the session, stated that Buhari was specific about the amendments he sought from the National Assembly, which was having direct and indirect options.

Consensus will subvert popular will, antithetical to democratic principles – CSOs

Meanwhile, a coalition of civil society organisations working towards the perfection of the electoral process in Nigeria on Wednesday rejected the introduction of consensus by the Senate as a mode of nomination of candidates in the Electoral. Act Bill 2021.

The activists, however, commended the swift action taken by the National Assembly upon resumption to review its position on direct primaries as the sole mode for the nomination of candidates in the Electoral Bill 2021.

While expressing fears that the new consensus mode “is antithetical to democratic principles and will result in the subversion of popular will”, the CSOs called for “the immediate withdrawal of this new introduction which is alien to the original Electoral Bill 2021 to speed up the work of the harmonization committee and conclusion of the amendment process on or before the 21 January 2022 deadline.”

The membership of the CSOs comprised Yiaga Africa, International Press Centre, Centre for Citizens with Disability, The Albino Foundation, CLEEN Foundation, Institute for Media and Society and Nigerian Women Trust Fund.

Others were Premium Times Centre for Investigative Journalism, Partners for Electoral Reform, Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre, Women Advocates Research and Documentation Centre, Nigeria Network of Non-Governmental Organizations and Inclusive Friends Association.

The groups in a joint statement signed on their behalf by the Executive Director of Yiaga Africa, Samson Itodo, rejected the action taken by the Senate.

The statement read in part, “We reject the decision of the Senate to introduce a completely new mode of ‘consensus’ as a procedure for candidates’ nomination. The consensus model is antithetical to democratic principles and will result in the subversion of popular will. Furthermore, it violates the rights of aspirants to equal participation in party primaries and limits the choice of voters to candidates who did not emerge from democratic primary elections.

“Judging from experience, the consensus has occasioned a litany of litigation in Nigeria’s electoral process. We call on the Senate to, in line with the popular will of Nigerians, adopt the position of the House of Representatives which now recognizes direct and indirect primaries as the procedure for nomination of candidates.”

The groups said the divergent positions of both chambers could delay the speedy conclusion of the process.

“We, therefore, call for the immediate withdrawal of this new introduction which is alien to the original Electoral Bill 2021 to speed up the work of the harmonization committee and conclusion of the amendment process on or before the 21 January 2022 deadline,” the CSOs said.

BIG STORY

Inside Delta: Police Arrest Man For Allegedly Stabbing Neighbour To Death Over Rice

Published

on

The Delta State Police Command confirmed the arrest of 30-year-old Daniel Onyejekwe for allegedly stabbing his neighbor, Christian, to death over a dispute about rice.

The incident occurred on New Year’s Day in the Ogwanja area of Sapele, Delta State.

The Police Public Relations Officer, Delta State Command, SP Bright Edafe, confirmed the development on Thursday, saying, “It is confirmed, and the suspect is in custody.

The two were fighting and injured themselves badly. Unfortunately, one, Christian, died.”

An eyewitness reported that the altercation started when rice was being shared along Boyo Road in Ogwanja.

An argument ensued between Onyejekwe and the deceased, leading to a physical fight.

The eyewitness stated, “Christian and Daniel started dragging the rice, and during the fight, Daniel picked a bottle and stabbed Christian multiple times. The vigilante rushed him to the hospital, but he was confirmed dead on arrival.”

The remains of the deceased have been deposited at a mortuary, while the police have launched an investigation. SP Edafe assured residents that the suspect would be prosecuted after the investigation was concluded.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Inside Imo: Catholic Priest Allegedly Shoots Boy Dead Over Knockouts During New Year Mass

Published

on

A Catholic Reverend Father has allegedly shot a boy dead after the latter set off knockouts within the church premises.

The incident, which happened during the New Year Mass held on January 1, 2025, in Amaimo, Ikeduru Local Government Area of Imo State, has attracted reactions from social media users.

However, the name and parish of the priest and the name of the deceased couldn’t be verified.

In a Facebook post shared via the handle, ‘For The Love Of Anambra,’ on Wednesday, it quoted eyewitness accounts, reporting that after the deceased set off the knockouts, “the priest, whose identity remains undisclosed, picked up a firearm and fatally shot him.”

“The incident has left the community in shock and mourning, with residents expressing outrage and demanding a thorough investigation to uncover the facts behind the unfortunate event.”

When contacted (by The Punch’s correspondent) on Thursday, the spokesperson for the Imo State Police Command, Henry Okoye, stated that the command is already aware of the incident.

Okoye added that an investigation has been launched into the incident.

“We have launched a detailed investigation to ascertain the remote facts surrounding the incident.

“Further development on the case will be communicated in due course, please,” the police spokesperson stated in a message.

Reacting to the incident, a Facebook user, Malachy Chukwunyereugo, wrote, “He will spend the rest of his life in prison.”

Another Facebook user, Lyn Chy, lamented, “The fact that a Reverend father owns a gun it’s somehow [sic].”

Another user, Peace Ijeoma, wrote, “It’s disheartening to see how religious bigots are defending the priest. May we try to be lovers of God and not lovers of the men of God this 2025. Rip to the boy.”

On X, a tweep identified as Bloc Chief, with the username #blochief, shared his amusement.

He tweeted, “I thought this happens in the USA? How can this happen in Imo? Mehn.”

Another tweep, identified as Rise above hat, but tweeting as #asababoi2man, wrote, “Maybe he has [been] abducted before by gunmen… so he felt the men are back.. only God knows what he was thinking.”

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

ASUU Declares 2025 “Year Of Long Battle With Federal Government”

Published

on

The Academic Staff Union of Universities has warned that “in the absence of visible and concrete efforts at addressing pending issues and meeting its expectations, 2025 will be a year of long-drawn confrontation between the union and the Federal Government.”

Describing efforts made by the Federal Government to address its issues last year as window-dressing and cosmetic, ASUU said the FG made no major difference in the university education sector, continued its neglect of the university system, and failed to satisfactorily resolve its issues in the year 2024.

According to the Chairman of ASUU, Ibadan chapter, Prof. Ayo Akinwole, in a statement on Wednesday, the uninterrupted academic calendar in 2024 was a result of the sacrifice of the union, not that the government had addressed its impending issues.

The union flayed the FG over policy summersault in the 18 years benchmark for admission into tertiary education and asked the President Bola Tinubu government to, instead of embarking on a fresh renegotiation of the agreement, set in motion a process that will lead to the review and signing of the Nimi Briggs-led renegotiated draft agreement.

The ASUU chairman said the FG continuously failed to put machinery in motion to address its long-drawn issues of “non-provision of funding for the revitalization of public universities based on the FGN-ASUU MoU of 2012, 2013, and the MoA of 2017; non-release of the three and a half months of the withheld salaries; non-release of third-party deductions like scheduled loans repayments, personal savings to retirement schemes and cooperative contributions.”

The union listed other pending issues as non-release and payment of arrears of Earned Academic Allowance (EAA); the creeping fascism in some Nigerian universities; the problem associated with the proliferation of public universities; non-implementation of the reports of the Visitation Panels; non-implementation of UTAS in place of IPPIS and non-renegotiation of 2009 FGN/ASUU Agreement.

“These pending issues were yet to be satisfactorily resolved in 2024 and will, no doubt, define the trajectories of the relationships between our Union and the Federal Government in 2025. Having reviewed the state of education in Nigeria in 2024, it is time to set an agenda for 2025.

“Fellow Nigerians, given the usual adamant posture of the Federal Government to satisfactorily address the pending issues concerning the education sector in general and the university system in particular, we expect that the year 2025 may, if care is not taken, be a year of another challenge and struggle.

“In the absence of visible and concrete efforts at addressing the pending issues and meeting our expectations, there is likely to be a long-drawn confrontation between our Union and the Federal Government, which will probably lead to another round of untold avoidable crisis in the university system in Nigeria.

“Given the important role of education in national development, it is expected that the Government should show a sincere commitment to reversing the downward trend in basic education by engaging in a total overhaul of the sector through the provision of basic facilities, such as good classrooms, desks, and chairs which will address the issues of over-crowding and dilapidation.

“The remuneration of the teachers should be reviewed to attract and recruit qualified teachers. Critical and concerted efforts should be deployed to tackle the high rate of out-of-school children in Nigeria, considering that education is the fundamental right of every Nigerian child.

“We also expect that the withheld three and a half months’ salaries and third-party deductions owed our members should be paid forthwith. We also expect that the Earned Academic Allowances (EAA) should be released, just as we expect that the funding for the revitalisation of the universities should be released by the FGN-ASUU MoU of 2012, 2013, and the MoA of 2017.

“The welfare of workers in the education sector and Nigerian workers is paramount, considering the state of the national economy and high cost of living, which has deepened the erosion of the conditions of service of our members.

“We, therefore, expect that the Nimi Briggs-led renegotiated draft agreement should be quickly reviewed in line with current economic indices and signed and that the university lecturers’ salaries should be restored to the African average which was the spirit of the 2009 Agreement, leading to the pegging of the professorial salaries at $3,000, which, in 2025, has amounted to paltry $200 due to the deterioration of the Nigerian Naira against the US dollar.

“It is also our expectation that the attack on TETFund should cease and the idea of commodifying university education in Nigeria should be dropped. Instead of borrowing bad examples from Britain and other capitalist countries, we should, as a developing country, borrow from countries like Germany, where education at all levels is free and properly funded.

“The welfare of workers in the education sector and Nigerian workers is paramount, considering the state of the national economy and high cost of living, which has deepened the erosion of the conditions of service of our members.

“We, therefore, expect that the Nimi Briggs-led renegotiated draft agreement should be quickly reviewed in line with current economic indices and signed and that the university lecturers’ salaries should be restored to the African average which was the spirit of the 2009 Agreement, leading to the pegging of the professorial salaries at $3,000, which, in 2025, has amounted to paltry $200 due to the deterioration of the Nigerian Naira against the US dollar.

“It is also our expectation that the attack on TETFund should cease and the idea of commodifying university education in Nigeria should be dropped. Instead of borrowing bad examples from Britain and other capitalist countries, we should, as a developing country, borrow from countries like Germany, where education at all levels is free and properly funded.

“Part of our expectations is that the long-standing challenges associated with the payment mode should be laid to rest in 2025 by the implementation of UTAS.

“Government as a matter of urgency should reverse the downward trend of public universities by deliberately restoring true hope for the children of the people who do not have any option of private university or overseas studies.

“Comrades, in this new year, let us summon more courage to act against the threat to knowledge and human dignity. Consequently, we advise our members to continue to remain vigilant and continue their support to the leadership of the Union at all levels. Let’s brace up for the crisis that may arise should our expectations not be satisfactorily met in 2025. For a people United Can Never Be Defeated,” the statement read.

The ASUU also rejected the tax reform bills as an attempt to an attempt to destroy the major source of infrastructural funding for already struggling public tertiary institutions, and “commodify university education in Nigeria.”

Akinwole held that the education tax to be replaced by a “development levy,” would disrupt the revenue stream of the Tertiary Education Trust Fund, which has been a major source of funding for infrastructure development in many public tertiary institutions.

The ASUU chairman also described the 2025 budgetary allocation to education as inadequate and below the expected 15 per cent to 20 percent internationally-advised benchmark.

Similarly, in October 2024, President Bola Tinubu asked the National Assembly to consider and pass four tax reform bills. The bills include the Nigeria Tax Bill, the Nigeria Tax Administration Bill, the Nigeria Revenue Service Establishment Bill, and the Joint Revenue Board Establishment Bill. A part of the tax administration bill proposes eliminating the education tax, to be replaced by a “development levy.”

“This would effectively disrupt the revenue stream of the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund), an agency set up as a product of the ingenuity and struggles of ASUU, that has been the major source of funding for infrastructure development in many public tertiary institutions over the last decade. Since its establishment in 2011, TETFund has monitored the disbursement of education tax to public tertiary institutions in Nigeria.

“However, with this new bill, only 50 per cent of the monies accruing to the levy would go to TETFund in 2025 and 2026. TETFund’s share will be upped to 66 per cent in 2027, 2028, and 2029. Then, the agency would cease to get any revenue from 2030. From 2030, the development levy will be solely meant to fund the federal government’s student loan scheme. What this means is that the agency that funds infrastructural development in Nigerian tertiary institutions is under the threat of extinction by 2030. This misbegotten policy will have huge and adverse implications for the university system in Nigeria.

“This is, no doubt, an attempt to destroy the major source of infrastructural funding for already struggling public tertiary institutions. It is also an attempt to commodify university education in Nigeria.

“Recently, the president presented the 2025 proposed budget of N47.90 trillion before the 10th National Assembly, out of which N3.52 trillion was earmarked for the education sector. This is roughly 7% of the total budget, which falls far below the benchmark of 15%-20% educational budget for underdeveloped countries like Nigeria, specified by both UNESCO and the United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), which has been advocated by our Union,” Akinwole said.

Continue Reading



 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular