Connect with us


BIG STORY

Court Declines IBD Dende’s Request To Stop Fisayo Soyombo, FIJ From Publishing Reports About Him

Published

on

A federal high court in Abuja has rejected a request by businessman Ibrahim Egungbohun, also known as IBD Dende, to restrain Fisayo Soyombo, founder of the Foundation for Investigative Journalism (FIJ), from publishing additional reports about him.

Egungbohun had filed a lawsuit against Soyombo and FIJ over an undercover report published in February 2024, titled “Undercover as a smuggler.”

In the report, Soyombo exposed the ease of illegally importing goods into Nigeria by attempting to smuggle 100 bags of rice from the Republic of Benin, highlighting the country’s porous borders.

The court’s decision allows FIJ to continue publishing reports about Egungbohun.

The journalist highlighted how he transported the bags of rice without resistance from security operatives after using information provided by some officials of the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS).

In the report, Soyombo described IBD Dende as the “biggest smuggler” in Ilaro, a town in Ogun state.

He also published a video where IBD Dende was threatening to kill a customs officer during an altercation.

Angered by the investigative report, IBD Dende filed a defamation suit against Soyombo, FIJ, and Arise Group after the television station broadcast the documentary.

At the resumed hearing on July 2, Binta Mohammed, the judge of the federal capital territory (FCT) high court, listened to the application for interlocutory injunction for an order to restrain the defendants from further defamatory publications against him.

  • The Arguments

In his written argument, the counsel of IBD Dende averred that the first and second defendants consistently defamed and maligned the character of his client.

The counsel claimed that Soyombo published statements about IBD Dende as recently as June 3, while the case was before the court.

The counsel said the investigative journalist is subjecting his client to a social media trial.

He averred that it had become imperative for the court to grant an injunction to halt the “continuous and daily defamatory publications” against the person of the claimant, pending the final determination of the suit.

The counsel said the right to freedom of expression under the constitution does not permit any journalist to defame a character.

On the video published by Soyombo, the counsel argued that the video was nothing more than a “verbal altercation” with customs officers.

The counsel said it cannot be concluded from the video that the incident was about smuggled goods belonging to IBD Dende.

He added that his client is a licensed customs clearing and forwarding agent, whose job it is to provide assistance to get goods transported into and out of Nigeria.

In the written argument submitted on behalf of Soyombo and FIJ, the counsel argued that the press is duty-bound to expose wrongdoing.

The counsel said the press must not be subjected to censorship or curtailed.

The FIJ counsel argued that IBD Dende, who had admitted under oath to assaulting law enforcement agencies, did not deserve an equitable relief of injunction to restrain the press.

The counsels closed their arguments, and the court reserved the ruling on the application for interlocutory injunction for a later date to be communicated to the parties.

Soyombo and FIJ have also filed a defence to the main suit, along with a list of witnesses to be invited to testify.

The witnesses include one Rotimi Awoyemi, the customs officer who was allegedly threatened in the video published by FIJ; Bashir Adewale Adeniyi (MFR), comptroller-general of customs; and Hussein Ejigbunu, whom IBD Dende reportedly mentioned in the viral video.

IBD Dende also listed two witnesses: himself and Oba Akintunde Akinyemi, the traditional ruler of Iselu, Yewa north LGA, whose written statement on oath was filed in support of the statement of claim.

BIG STORY

JUST IN: Nigerian Lawmakers Propose Creation Of 31 Additional States [SEE FULL LIST]

Published

on

Nigeria’s House of Representatives Committee on Constitution Review on Thursday proposed the creation of 31 new states in the country.

If the proposal is approved, Nigeria will have 67 sub-national governments, as the current number of states stands at 36, including the Federal Capital Territory.

The proposal for new states was presented in a letter read during Thursday’s plenary session by the Deputy Speaker, Benjamin Kalu, who presided over the session in the absence of the Speaker, Mr. Tajudeen Abbas.

The letter read in part, “The committee proposes the creation of 31 new states. As amended, this section outlines specific requirements that must be fulfilled to initiate the process of state creation, which include the following:

“1. New state and boundaries

“An act of the National Assembly for the purpose of creating a new state shall only be passed if it requires support by at least the third majority of members.

“The House of Representatives, the House of Assembly in respect of the area, and the Local Government Council in respect of the area are received by the National Assembly.

“Local government advocates for the creation of additional local government areas are only reminded that Section 8 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended, applies to this process.

“Specifically, in accordance with Section 8 (3) of the Constitution, the outcome of the votes of the State Houses of Assembly in the referendum must be forwarded to the National Assembly for fulfillment of state,” the proposal partly reads.

According to the proposal, the new states include Okun, Okura, and Confluence States from Kogi; Benue Ala and Apa States from Benue; FCT State; Amana State from Adamawa; Katagum from Bauchi and Savannah States from Borno and Muri State from Taraba.

Others include New Kaduna and Gujarat from Kaduna State; Tiga and Ari from Kano; Kainji from Kebbi State; Etiti and Orashi as the 6th state in the South East; Adada from Enugu; and Orlu and Aba from the South East.

Also included are Ogoja from Cross River State, Warri from Delta, Ori and Obolo from Rivers, Torumbe from Ondo, Ibadan from Oyo, Lagoon from Lagos, Ogun, Ijebu from Ogun State, and Oke Ogun/Ijesha from Oyo/Ogun/Osun States.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

El-Rufai Lacks Capacity To Unsettle Tinubu, He Can’t Even Win Senatorial Seat — Daniel Bwala

Published

on

Daniel Bwala, special adviser to the president on policy communication, asserts that Nasir el-Rufai, the former governor of Kaduna, lacks the capacity to “unsettle” President Bola Tinubu.

Bwala made this statement on Thursday during an interview with TVC News. He emphasized that Tinubu is not losing sleep over el-Rufai’s continuous criticisms of his administration.

Background

El-Rufai has been targeting some members of the Tinubu administration.

The former minister of the federal capital territory (FCT) recently criticized the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) for “straying away from its core values,” mentioning that he no longer recognizes his political party.

Bwala had questioned el-Rufai if his stance on the APC would have been different had he been a member of Tinubu’s cabinet.

In response to Bwala’s comments, el-Rufai stated that he would not hesitate to criticize the party, even if he were given a position in the Tinubu administration.

‘On His Own, El-Rufai Is Unelectable’

When asked if the presidency was anxious about el-Rufai’s remarks and the regrouping of opposition politicians, the spokesperson confirmed that Tinubu is not concerned with the opposition’s movements.

Bwala emphasized that the president’s approach has always been one of reconciliation.

“Who is jittery? The political opponents have no direction. There is no organized political party in Nigeria other than APC. Almost all opposition parties are trying to find their way,” Bwala stated.

“I don’t attack because I see that the position of Mr. President is that of reconciliation. In his 18 months in office, he has never reacted to anybody. He has never been seen being combative or aggressive against anybody.”

The presidential spokesperson acknowledged el-Rufai’s dilemma, adding that the former governor cannot accomplish his goals by joining the opposition.

According to Bwala, el-Rufai only becomes a significant political figure when he aligns with a “solid revolutionary” leader.

“El-Rufai, as he said, is still in APC. You treat him like a brother. I know his grandstanding. I know he is facing challenges finding a path,” he stated.

“If you leave a governing party, which you have influence over, and think that you can undertake a mission, you need to have a working platform to do that.”

“He does not have the capacity to make the president unsettled. No opposition party, even if combined, can make the president unsettled.”

“Let me tell you something about my elder brother, el-Rufai, and whether we should be worried.”

“There is a dynamic around el-Rufai. El-Rufai needed a solid revolutionary person to thrive. On his own, el-Rufai may not win the senate.”

“He won governorship because of the Buhari factor and got re-elected because of the Buhari factor. If you leave him now to go and run for senate in Kaduna, he would not win.”

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Importers To Pay More As Customs Introduces 4% FOB Levy

Published

on

The Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) has announced that it will enforce a 4 percent charge on the “free-on-board” (FOB) value of imports.

“FOB” refers to the arrangement where the seller is responsible for delivering the goods to the port of departure, clearing them for export, and loading the goods onto the vessel. Once the goods are on the vessel, the risk transfers from the seller to the buyer, who then assumes responsibility for all subsequent costs.

In a statement released on Wednesday, Abdullahi Maiwada, NCS national public relations officer, confirmed that the directive is in line with the provisions of the “Nigeria Customs Service Act” (NCSA) 2023.

“In line with the provisions of Section 18 (1) of NCSA 2023, the NCS is implementing a 4 percent charge on the “Free On-Board” (FOB) value of imports,” Maiwada stated.

“The FOB charge, which is calculated based on the value of imported goods, including the cost of goods and transportation expenses incurred up to the port of loading, is essential for driving the effective operation of the service.”

“Furthermore, the NCS acknowledges concerns raised by stakeholders over the continued collection of the 1 percent “Comprehensive Import Supervision Scheme” (CISS) fee.”

“It is a regulatory charge imposed for funding Nigeria’s Destination Inspection Scheme alongside the 4 percent FOB charge.”

“As a responsive government agency, the service wishes to assure the general public that extensive consultation is ongoing with the federal ministry of finance to address all agitations raised by our esteemed stakeholders.”

Maiwada urged all stakeholders to comply with the directive, which was conceived after thorough consultation with relevant stakeholders and organizations.

“All stakeholders are urged to support this legally binding initiative,” he emphasized.

“As the measures introduced in alignment with the NCSA 2023 reflect a balanced approach born out of extensive consultations with industry players, importers, and regulatory bodies.”

He also acknowledged the valuable contribution of stakeholders in shaping and actualizing the NCSA 2023.

“Their insights, expertise, and unwavering commitment have been instrumental in ensuring a robust legal framework that enhances efficiency, promotes innovation, and strengthens transparency in customs operations,” he added.

The customs official reiterated that under the leadership of Adewale Adeniyi, the comptroller-general, the service remains dedicated to transparency, fair trade practices, and efficient revenue management.

Continue Reading



 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular