Connect with us


BIG STORY

Alleged N304Million Fraud: EFCC Presents More Evidence Against Former NIMASA Director-General, Haruna Baba Jauro, Two Others

Published

on

Justice Tijani Ringim of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos State has admitted in evidence more documents tendered by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against the former Acting Director-General of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), Haruna Baba Jauro, and two others.

Jauro alongside one Dr. Dauda Bitrus Bawa and a company, Thlumbau Enterprises Limited, are being prosecuted on 19 counts bordering on stealing and money laundering to the tune of N304,118,500.

The Lagos Zonal Office of the EFCC first arraigned Jauro and the two others on April 12, 2016, before retired Justice Mojisola Olatoregun of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos.

The anti-graft commission in a statement said at the resumed sitting, the prosecution presented its third prosecution witness (PW3), Orji Chukwuma, an investigator with the Commission.

Led in evidence by the prosecution counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), Chukwuma of the Chairman Monitoring Unit, EFCC, Abuja, told the court that he was the Head of Special Task Force Unit 3, Lagos Zonal Command, at the time of the investigation of the alleged fraud.

When asked if he knew the defendants and the company, Thlumbau Enterprises Limited, the witness whom the Commission said his team was tasked with investigating money laundering and other financial crimes, told the court that he came across all the defendants in the course of his investigation, upon receipt of intelligence reports against the management of NIMASA.

He explained that in the course of investigations, various enquiries were made to banks and staff members of NIMASA and that interviews were also conducted on staff, banks’ employees, contractors to NIMASA, corporate organizations, individuals who made payments into the 3rd and 1st defendants’ accounts as well as some beneficiaries of the proceeds made by them.

According to him, investigations revealed that the 3rd defendant was incorporated by the 1st defendant, using his children, while the 2nd defendant operated the account of the 3rd defendant.

Chukwuma also told the court: “Further investigation revealed that proceeds of unlawful activities of the 1st defendant, while he was the Executive Director of Finance and Administration in NIMASA, was concealed and laundered for his benefit through the 3rd defendant. The proceeds were used to acquire a property in Abuja.”

He further informed the court that funds co-mingled with loans taken from Aso Savings Limited to also acquire two other houses in Lagos.

When he was asked if he could identify both Exhibits A1 and A2 which are the 3rd defendant’s statement of account containing the proceeds of the enquiries and investigations he carried out, Chukwuma identified Exhibit A series as the 3rd defendant’s mandate and statement of accounts, responses to the EFCC’s enquiries as well as the instruments used to move money out of the 3rd defendant’s account.

Giving evidence about Exhibit A1 and the share structures of the 3rd defendant, the witness told the court that one Samuel Haruna Baba had 500,000 ordinary units; one Salome Haruna Baba owned 250,000 ordinary shares and one Ila Haruna owned 200,000 ordinary shares.

According to him, the names mentioned are children and relations of the 1st defendant. He added that their addresses are the same as his.

Asked if he could identify the enquiries he recovered while conducting investigations in NIMASA, Chukwuma did, adding that they were documents from NIMASA to banks to effect payments.

The prosecution sought to tender a copy of the internal memo of NIMASA dated July 8, 2014, and two letters of instructions to Access Bank from NIMASA dated January 3, 2014; to which the court admitted all the evidence and marked as exhibits B, B1 and B2.

The prosecution counsel also asked the witness if there was an exchange of correspondence regarding the Aso Savings loans he earlier talked about, to which he answered in the affirmative, adding that it contained the mandate, statement of account, certificate of identification and mortgage correspondence of the first defendant.

The prosecution counsel further sought to tender the letter dated February 10, 2016, from Aso Savings and Loans Plc to the EFCC with its attachments, and the court also admitted all of them in evidence and marked them as Exhibit C.

Testifying more about Exhibit A and some entries made on January 6, 2014, Chukwuma explained that there was an inflow of N15 million ( Fifteen Million Naira) that came from the Committee of Intelligence belonging to NIMASA.

“The Committee is set up and funded by NIMASA for specific purposes related to security.

“Investigations showed from the account statement of January 23, 2014, that the sum of N12m (Twelve Million Naira) out of the N15m (Fifteen Million) was transferred to the account of the first defendant in Aso Savings to manage the loans he took to buy property.

“On July 10, 2014, another sum of N20m (Twenty Million Naira) was also paid into the account of the third defendant.

“Subsequently, the 2nd defendant also benefited the sum of N1,470,000 (One Million, Four Hundred and Seventy Thousand Naira), which was later returned to the Commission in a draft,” he said.

When he was shown copies of the draft by the prosecution counsel, he identified them as the statement of one Ishaq Banabas, who returned the total sum of N35m (Thirty-five Million Naira) through five different bank drafts to the EFCC Draft Registration Form Receipt.

Draft Registration Form receipts were admitted in evidence and marked as exhibits D and D1 respectively. The PW3, in his further testimony, told the court that the sum of N20m ( Twenty Million Naira) was transferred by Kishini Nigeria Limited and another N5m( Five Million Naira) was paid to the third defendant by Eminent Consult.

The 3rd defendant’s account, according to him, was co-mingled and aggregated to the sum of N52m (Fifty-two Million Naira) paid to one Helen Mbonu, who used it to purchase a house for the first defendant. When asked about the various entries in the exhibit A series, the PW3 told the Court that there were several inflows from various individuals and companies into the 3rd defendant’s accounts, including Sulaiman Mohammed, Komas Mega BDC, Dan Asabe, Mustapha Buka, Dulbangon Enterprise, Kostam Mega Concept, Kolomi Mohammed, Abubakar Mansur, Mukaila Jubrila, Alkawali Nigerian Enterprise and Hassan.

Asked if the third defendant rendered any services that led to the various cash payments totalling N120m, the witness told the court that the 3rd defendant never rendered any services, adding that “the payments are proceeds of unlawful activities.”

BIG STORY

BREAKING : DSS Files Charge Against Sowore, Facebook, X Over False Claim Against Tinubu

Published

on

The Department of State Services (DSS) has filed a five-count charge against Omoyele Sowore, politician and activist, at the Federal High Court in Abuja over his online remarks directed at President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

Sowore, who disclosed the development on Tuesday through his social media handles, said the charges arose from posts where he described the President as a “criminal.” The DSS reportedly cited this label, alongside other content shared on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter), as evidence for what the activist described as “novel” and politically driven offences.

“I have somehow committed a set of ‘novel’ offences they invented and spread across five counts,” Sowore wrote, adding that the charges also implicated the platforms X and Facebook. The activist noted, however, that the legal consequences for the companies remain uncertain.

Observers and critics have condemned the move, describing it as a further clampdown on free expression and political opposition in Nigeria. Sowore, who was the presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC) in the 2015 general election and convener of the #RevolutionNow movement, insisted that he would appear in court whenever the case is assigned for hearing.

“It’s hard to believe there’s anyone sensible left in these offices that should be making Nigeria work,” he added.

As of the time of filing this report, the DSS has not issued any official statement on the matter. Legal experts and civil society organisations are expected to follow the proceedings closely, given the potential implications of the case for political speech and digital rights in Nigeria.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

Dangote Replies NUPENG: Our CNG Trucks Will Create 24,000 Jobs, Drivers Earn Triple Of Minimum Wage

Published

on

Aliko Dangote, president of Dangote Group, has dismissed claims that the Dangote Petroleum Refinery is displacing workers, insisting instead that the company is creating thousands of new jobs.

Speaking at a press briefing on Monday, the billionaire said the deployment of 4,000 compressed natural gas (CNG) trucks would generate at least 24,000 direct and indirect jobs nationwide.

“We are not taking jobs away; we are creating more opportunities. The CNG trucks will not be operated by robots,” Dangote said.

He explained that the refinery’s drivers are paid salaries three times higher than the national minimum wage. In addition, employees receive life insurance, health insurance that covers their spouses and up to four children, and a guaranteed lifelong pension.

According to him, the recruitment drive extends beyond drivers to include mechanics, fleet managers, and other technical professionals who will support the new fleet.

The refinery had announced the acquisition of the 4,000 CNG trucks on June 15, saying the move would strengthen its nationwide fuel distribution. By June 29, the company projected that the distribution scheme could save Nigeria over ₦1.7 trillion annually.

However, three months later, the Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG) threatened a nationwide strike, accusing Dangote Refinery of anti-union practices. Though the union suspended a two-day strike on September 9, it warned of possible further action.

‘Refinery not opposed to unions’

Sayyu Dantata, founder of MRS Oil Nigeria Plc, stressed that Dangote Refinery was open to working with NUPENG and other labour organisations.

“We are not against unions. We want to live and work alongside them. There’s no problem with that,” he said.

He noted that the refinery only became aware of the union’s grievances through media reports, despite his longstanding ties with industry unions.

“By law, unions are expected to give notice and a grace period before action. Even so, we went into dialogue. Unionism is not by force. People have the right to decide whether or not to belong,” Dantata said.

He added that the refinery welcomes all business partners without discrimination, whether they are union members or not.

“Our focus is the common man. Most of our drivers prefer independence because we ensure they earn a decent wage,” he said.

According to him, the new working conditions have elevated the social status of truck drivers in Nigeria. “For the first time, a driver can proudly tell his children that he is a truck driver and still provide them with food, shelter, and education,” Dantata said.

Continue Reading

BIG STORY

NASU, SSANU Join ASUU To Threaten Strike Over Unpaid Salaries, Allowances

Published

on

The Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities (SSANU) and the Non-Academic Staff Union of Educational and Associated Institutions (NASU) have given the Federal Government a seven-day ultimatum to address long-standing grievances affecting non-academic staff across universities.

In a joint letter dated September 12, 2025, the unions criticised what they described as the “unfair” sharing of earned allowances, the non-payment of outstanding entitlements, and delays in resolving other critical labour matters.

The document, signed by SSANU President Muhammed Ibrahim and NASU General Secretary Peters Adeyemi, reminded Education Minister Tunji Alausa of an earlier letter from their Joint Action Committee (JAC) on June 18, 2025. That letter, they said, had outlined pressing issues requiring government intervention.

Following the correspondence, the minister convened a meeting with NASU and SSANU leaders on July 4, 2025, to discuss the concerns raised.

According to the unions, the outstanding matters include: the “unjust disbursement” of ₦50 billion in earned allowances, non-payment of withheld salaries, failure to implement a 25/35 per cent salary increment, and the delayed renegotiation of the 2009 FGN–NASU/SSANU agreements.

They warned that if the government failed to act within the seven-day window starting Monday, September 15, 2025, their members would embark on a series of lawful industrial actions, including strikes.

The statement further noted that during the July 4 meeting, it was agreed that a Tripartite Committee—comprising the Federal Ministry of Education, the National Universities Commission, and representatives of the two unions—would be set up to address the imbalance in the ₦50 billion allowances. The unions argued that while university staff received a share, workers in Inter-University Centres were completely excluded.

On the matter of two months’ withheld salaries, the unions said there was no resolution at the July meeting. However, the minister reportedly pledged to fast-track the payment of arrears tied to the 25/35 per cent salary increment owed to members.

They added that a reminder letter was sent to the minister on August 18, 2025, due to what they described as his office’s silence—or deliberate refusal—to act on the issues.

The statement also faulted the government for dragging its feet on the renegotiation of the 2009 agreements. The committee chaired by Alhaji Yayale Ahmed, inaugurated on October 15, 2024, only met with the JAC once—on December 10, 2024. Since then, the unions claimed, the government team has stopped engaging them, even though it has reportedly concluded renegotiations with the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU).

The unions recalled that they raised this concern during the July 4 meeting, where the minister promised to intervene. However, no progress has been recorded since then.

“Despite our repeated attempts to draw attention to the plight of our members in universities and Inter-University Centres, the government has failed to act,” the unions said.

They stressed that, given the continued inaction, they had no choice but to issue a final seven-day notice beginning September 15, 2025. Failure to meet their demands, they warned, would result in nationwide strikes and other industrial actions.

Continue Reading


 

 


 

 

 

Join Us On Facebook

Most Popular